Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
It's against the spread. Which is more important? Away dogs covering 54% thru 2000 games or a sportsbettor winning 54% thru 2000 picks.
Ditz is hung up in a word game and thinks his opinion is final. That's his flaw. All he has is an opinion. He doesn't get to dictate to everyone else.
IIRC, Axel, you've been working sports for what 20 years or so? According to Ditz you've just recently "invaded" sportsbetting.
Well, mickey, maybe you're not as bright as I thought. It's not so much that my opinion is final on this. It's that the answer is hideously obvious, and if you ask anyone with a smidgeon of intellect, you're going to get the same answers.
It's really the same kind of deal as regards Fezzik and the parlay card angles -- everybody who was anybody was doing it (even before I got there in '82, in fact). It's hideously obvious.
I'll do the video after I return from Las Vegas. I'll hire a professional. I need a good spot to shoot it. I do have an idea, but it may require guerrilla filming.