KJ, is your attorney filing a separate, i.e. wholly different law suit against the fired guard, or simply naming him as an individual / responsible party in the original suit?
It certainly seems to me that only one suit would be needed, naming both the guard and his employer as parties; SP would be liable for his actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior.


 
			
			 
			 
					
					
					
						 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
			
 
			
 I am not a big fan of that number "69".  I find it problematic (was going to say "hard" but) to concentrate on both doing a good job pleasing as well as thoroughly enjoying the pleasure being given, at the same time.  I am much more a you do me and then I will do you, kind of guy.  And sometimes even a you do me and I will roll over and go to sleep and talk to you in the morning, kind of guy.
 I am not a big fan of that number "69".  I find it problematic (was going to say "hard" but) to concentrate on both doing a good job pleasing as well as thoroughly enjoying the pleasure being given, at the same time.  I am much more a you do me and then I will do you, kind of guy.  And sometimes even a you do me and I will roll over and go to sleep and talk to you in the morning, kind of guy.  
						