My Casino back-rooming.

[accountinquestion]

MrV: is there a way for me to contact you again privately. I have a question for you that I would rather not post publicly. Not so much a legal question as a "is this appropriate" type question.

AinQ: Is the above question directed at me? If so, I don't play that game. The answer is not on this site. My good AP friend here in Vegas has mentioned meeting me on a blackjack site, but has asked me not to mention his name on this forum. A member at WoV posted that he met me. Another posted that he found me watched me play, as he was considering me for his team, but never introduced himself. I found that a little creepy. My attorney has asked me not to mention his name on this forum. There are a couple others that I just won't mention even though they have not requested it. If they want to disclose our relationship, they are welcome to, but I would not ask that of them, especially regarding this forum. A long-time AP that I have not met but have communicated with privately asked my not to mention even his handle, not real name but his handle on this forum.

THAT is what you guys have turned this forum into. Even though a handful of AP's participate here, even engage in some trolling, most AP's want nothing to do with this forum. I have heard it referred to as a garbage site and a common nickname is "the urinal". YOU people did that. I guess that is what the majority wanted. I advocated as strongly as I could for less of the garbage shit and more AP/gambling content.

Even more stunning to me is that you think the question you asked is appropriate. I am on a private AP forum, not accessible to the public, where a current member has to vouch for each new member. THAT vetting process is to insure that anything discussed is done so away from potential casino or casino related eyes and ears.

This however is a public, anonymous internet forum. That some of you people think someone on a public forum should be required to be vetted in this manner or show financial proof of something as is on trial for a crime, is quite astonishing. Maybe you have forgotten or are not aware of just what an anonymous internet forum is. Although I have challenged claims I have found completely ridiculous and math defying, I have never once asked for proof of anything. Not from Singer. Not from Mdawg. Others have. I do not think that is appropriate, as no one is on trial. Nor do I think that is even necessary. I can determine who is legit and knows what they are talking about as opposed to just talking and usually pretty quickly. I think most others can as well, even if they have a different standard that I.

Final point: Rob singer has been vetted and spoken for: At WoV it was his sock puppet Jerry Logan (among others). Here his sock puppet, GirlsFriday, verified by Dan Druff, who spoke on his behalf. So what is the point anyway?

LMAO. Whatever dude. 10 years or whatever and you can't use someone's public handle to vouch. All bullshit whispering stuff that can't be verified. Get off the high horse and get a clue why people so doubt your story.

This isn't even a normal vouch like.. "you can trust him with money." This is simply a "I can vouch X is a real person who does what they claim". Don't get the 2 confused.

A simple vouch. Like Mr Crimm met me on a random trip of his. He can say "yes I met AIQ and he knows a good amount about machines. He even showed me a play.". That doesn't say I am a real AP by any stretch but it does demonstrate i'm not just making up stuff.

Trolling whine whine.. put it off on others. That bullshit won't fly. If you wanted less trolling then the most simple of vouches would go a long ways to slowing down the trolling.

Not only is your story exceptional but the fact you can't find another person to vouch for you BY THEIR HANDLE is also exceptional all things considered.

Furthermore I am in no way asking anyone to reveal anything personal or that could lead to a DOXing. Your indignation is my indigestion. Give us a break.