The Verdict Is?

[MisterV]

V, I try to play it both ways, but, always, with the scientific foot, first.

Einstein was the last of the famous physicists to be a philosopher, too, as well as both a skilled lab technician, and theorist. As much as Hawking appreciated Einstein's mathematical interpretation of things, extended and simplified it, Hawking publicly pronounced philosophy to be dead. Hawking believed that there could be no theory of everything, hence no God, etc, - based on mathematical proof that there could be no axiomatic basis on which to base every truth, ie, there are things that may be both true, but, wholly not provable. Each was a product of their times, particularly of their limits of physical experimentation.

Einstein believed there was one unique solution to everything with Relativity Theory (opposed to Quantum Theories) at its core, but, now several believe that there are several thus solutions, and, in the form of many different notions of physics, itself, which, of course, means that we could not have any way of knowing the other types of physics.

My belief has, always, more or less, been, eg, that the overall puzzle has to be simultaneously worked from each end.

Simultaneous, say, in the abstract sense that even though matter and antimatter, supposedly, stem from nothingness, and, each is eternal, their creation/annihilation is ongoing, which, coincidentally, is a result of quantum entanglement.

Supposedly, matter is taken as the low-energies, in a field, that are perceivable as the periodic table, chemical elements. Einstein noted that matter doesn't truly exist. Contrary to popular belief, Einstein's gravitational field stuff is about energy, not, mass, which is the reason that the Higgs particle stuff, which gives rise to mass on a quantum level, has nothing to do with the big unknown, quantum gravity. (That negative energy doesn't exist, but, the energy of the gravitational curvature of space-time, in a sense, is the "anti-energy".)

Which leads to the notion that mind, itself, either, doesn't truly exist. Which leads to totally unconventional methods to solve the overall puzzle. Which, accidentally or otherwise, leads to a way that very indirectly involves some relatively very simple math attached to only one method of thus solution. You might call it the "standing on thin-ice approach". What no mathematician, or physicist, will accept without simple, self-evident proof beyond an arbitrarily small reasonable doubt. Try telling one that base ten, with numerals made of the digits from 0, to 9, (along with base fourteen), is the natural or preferred system of numerals. You would be met with howls of laughter. But, it's true.

Oh, speaking of Fibonacci (spiral), there's no reason that time has to wrap around on itself, like space, according to Hawking, or, continue without start, or end. One need only start to put things together in a simplistic sense.

Really good post there, old boy, well done.

I too struggle with cosmological questions and have concluded "There are some things I will never simply know, notwithstanding how fundamental the question is."

[accountinquestion]

Lol breaking your arm from the security guard pushing you into a chair.

Mr Brittle Bones.

Dude, you say a lot of really stupid things, both about me and unrelated to me. I don't comment on most. But this thing that you keep repeating has to be one of the stupidest.

Yea, because a middle aged dude is going to break a bone by flopping their arm against a table. lololol. You're too dumb to know how implausible that is. I've caught you lying about me NUMEROUS times. Grow up.

Of course you dislike me. I had a large part in instigating this search for truth when I asked you to simply give the case number to Druff. Then you gave a million reasons why you can't trust him. Even though you also claim you've been doxxed numerous times..

You should have just said that you settled out of court but again you're just too much of a dummy. I find it hard to believe an attorney would file a case in court when sending a demand letter would almost have guaranteed to suffice. The casino knows you have a case. You don't need to show them you're legitimate by filing the case. It is called a demand letter. It also saves the attorney a good deal of time.

Mister V - am I wrong here?

Anyway.. pathetic. Just pathetic. Absolutely no shame.

[MDawg]

I had searched federal cases (US District Court for the District of Nevada) very thoroughly using Pacer and there is no lawsuit that is remotely related to this cause of action anywhere in federal.

In any case, UNKewlJ has more than once quoted the NRS (Nevada Revised Statutes) as to why his case was sealed. The NRS do not apply to federal cases.
So he's running with the "story" that this was filed in the
Eighth Judicial District Court
Civil over >15K
https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Por...e/Dashboard/29

I canNOT talk about the case specifically, but here the general rule. Please note the part where compelling privacy or safety interests outweigh the public interest. It takes a judge to determine that.

I can NOT get into this, but you are talking about something you don't undertstand like YOU, Rob always do.

4.Grounds to seal or redact; written findings required. The court may order the court files and records, or any part thereof, in a civil action to be sealed or redacted, provided the court makes and enters written findings that the specific sealing or redaction is justified by identified compelling privacy or safety interests that outweigh the public interest in access to the court record.

Hey, he claims he found two recent civil cases just today, where only the case # was listed and nothing more. These two cases have nothing to do with him, let him provide those now. Should take him about two seconds to provide those, he just found them. But he can't, because those do not exist any more than the nonexistent case he claims is his.

You have to understand, you are dealing with a

he can't help but lie, and the lies don't necessarily make any sense.

[accountinquestion]

recent[/B] civil cases he found today that have only the case # listed? Those cases have nothing to do with him, so he could provide those could he not?S

It seems that no record of his case being filed in Clark county can be found: that seems to be quite clear, at least based on what some sletuths have posted.

BUT (and it's a big but) as I speculated some time ago, what if his attorney filed in Federal, not county court?

Would the database(s) searched find such a filing?

As for the feds having subject matter jurisdiction, i.e. for them to have the ability to hear his case, there needs to be a recognized ground.

Perhaps diversity of citizenship, i.e. not all parties are deemed to be Nevada residents?

That seems unlikely, but if the casino is owned by a corporation in another state then it MIGHT apply, I'm not sure.

Or the guard could be a non-citzen, working at the casino on a green card or the equivalent, but again I am not sure.

The PI cases I filed were all in the county court system, not the federal: federal practice is a whole different thing.

I'd prefer to have the case exist than to conclude KJ lied to me; not that he owes me the truth, but I really wouldn't like it at all.

You think an attorney is going to waste the time of a federal court with this shit (and nearly immediately withdraw the case)?!? Don't you have to be approved to file a case in federal court? (IE licensed to practice law does not auto-entitle you to be able to file in federal court)

File a case just to nearly immediately settle out of court? Tell me if I am wrong because I'm speaking out of my expertise but I've had many discussions about the basics of law over the years. It isn't going to make a federal judge very happy to be doing this.

Mdawg? Opinion on the above?

[Gottlob1]

Einstein was the last of the famous physicists to be a philosopher

Sean Carroll is an example of this - he is now at Johns Hopkins by way of Cal Tech.

Well, keep in mind that Einstein applied his philosophy to his results in physics, often with disastrous results. Besides that, I neglected to mention which of math, and, physics, I put before the other.

For decades, the physics, first, in the sense that I never tried to force the numbers onto my theory. I would "come up for air", after years on end, to try to relate my theory to the periodic table of elements, as a form of calibration. But, ultimately, what happened was that the theoretical part started to spit out particular numerals. That was around the time, a few years ago, when the Covid stuff started up, and, I got into the numerological stuff, with a bunch of people way ahead of me, in terms of the goofy ways to thus relate numerals. Probably the height of the (corrosive) "new gematria" forums. They weren't particularly clever, let alone mathematically savvy, but, by then, they had a decent database of, and fluency with, the thus numerals, to interest me, for a couple of months at a time. Sort of tied in with my brief stint at the Penalty Box forum. (If I recall - it's all a blur now - I referred Alan's site to LarryS, and, within a month or two, V, came over.) Anyway, after a fair bit of reverse engineering, since then, I managed to similarly pair off some of the corresponding numerals to the main ones to do with our universe. There is a lot of mileage in making such a far-fetched leap, in the hidden percentage of interrelating the thus pairs of numerals, more so than in trying to understand them individually.

You make a lot of notes along the way, but, certainly can't recall a lot of the details because it's not possible to know which of what is crucial before you see it. Anyway, I was working on the latest bit, a generating function for the fine structure, had made some headway, after another flurry of work in early May, and, sort of figured out how it fit in, laid out its boundaries.

Then, a few weeks ago, one night, I thought to try something a bit different with the equations at hand. Equations that I could have further researched on their own, years ago, but didn't. Something a bit different, but in no way suspect. Just one of another of tens of thousands of things you might look at out of curiosity, distraction, or whatever gets you out of bed to run them through a computer. Luckily, I caught a big enough piece of it to recognize, and, then, further pursue, it. And, as much as the numerals can take on a life of their own, flawlessly, after jiggling them into place, you still have to know what to look for, in terms of relating them to a specific physics theory.

I tried a few more of the well-known mathematical and/or physics universal constants. Pi was the first to take me two tries, because I didn't start to look for it in just the right spot. I'm finishing up now with the golden ratio, which comes in two parts, the one part fairly obvious, but, the other a bit tricky if try to thus further extend its meanings. Very, very strange numerals, down to eight decimal places, twelve decimal places in a different way, with reoccurring particular digits in particular spots. Numerals that, as far as I know, haven't even been related to the fine structure of our universe. Overall, though, a totally unmistakable pattern, which is hardly what would I would call a pattern, anymore. Something that was intentionally set up that way.

[MisterV]

Accountinquestion, you are correct that in almost all cases an attorney in a PI claim will first send a demand letter to the defemdant's insurer prior to filing suit.

Some attorneys make it a practice to file quickly and then discuss, but I reserved filing for cases that would not settle after a demand letter was sent.

A federal judge would not care if a case settled shortly after filing, but that seems moot based on MDawg's report that he checked the relevant federal court database and found nothing.

[Rob.Singer]

I'm enjoying watching kew having all his past lies about anyone and everyone, including himself, being his complete and undeniable dismantling. What's even better? He's being forced to keep making up phony facts and more lies, even to his "online AP friends" and he looks like Mr. Stupid in doing so.

It won't be long before this liar will be begging for help.

[kewlJ]

What a low-life and dishonest person you continue to prove yourself to be you fucking low-life foreigner.

For those that may not know, the above is my heading or whatever you want to call it that shows at Gambling forum, when I post...Less the doctored compulsive liar banner. That was doctored by Mdawg.

This is like posting a quote of someone and manually changing the words, which on many forums will get you banned or suspended.

Whatever your position on the matter being discussed, THIS kind of dishonest bullshit should be offensive to everyone. But I am sure it won't because it was done to me.

[kewlJ]

If a guy is willing to do what MDawg just did....doctoring photos and images, then why would anyone believe the many images he has posted of cash, chips, win loss statements are real and not doctored?

MDawg just voluntarily put himself in the same lite as Singer who has posted doctored bills of sale, pictures of fake money bought from Amazon and of course a picture in an RV at the dealership, where the nearby employee is telling him "to get his feet off the bedspread".

Like me or not, if you guys aren't willing to condemn this action, then this forum has zero credibility remaining.

[MisterV]

This thread is about YOUR actions and claims, not MDawg's or Singer's.

FWIW you know I have concerns about their claims, as I suspect do most of the others here, but quit deflecting, KJ: this is YOUR chance to shine or wither in the hot bright sunlight.

[kewlJ]

I cannot discuss what you want me to discuss MrV. That is the end of the story for me....for my participation.

But if you and others are unwilling to call out the blatant dishonesty shown by mdawg as part of this discussion, then don't anyone even suggest this is about getting to any kind if truth..

[MDawg]

He can't even post the two case numbers for the two "sealed" civil cases he claimed he found, that have nothing to do with him, where he claims that only the court case # appears, because even those do not exist - any civil case sealed after 2008 would have the full docket visible, NOT solely the case number. Just another clumsy lie he made up, that made him look even worse. An obvious lie, easily reputed.

He searched for nothing, he found nothing, because nothing is there to find. All fabrication.

spent two hours last night. Would have taken the better part of a full day to search everything. But in those two hours I found not only the case "I was interested in", but two additional cases that showed ONLY a case number. No further information.

How about giving us those two cases numbers? They have nothing to do with you, so...give 'em up to at least prove ONE THING amongst the mountain of lies you've been spreading for years now.


Another clumsy piece of turd the compulsive liar left behind is this:

I can NOT get into this, but you are talking about something you don't undertstand like YOU, Rob always do.

4.Grounds to seal or redact; written findings required. The court may order the court files and records, or any part thereof, in a civil action to be sealed or redacted, provided the court makes and enters written findings that the specific sealing or redaction is justified by identified compelling privacy or safety interests that outweigh the public interest in access to the court record.

It's a lie that he "cannot get into this," because per statute:

Rule 3
4(c) Sealing of entire court file prohibited.  Under no circumstances shall the court seal an entire court file. An order entered under these rules must, at a minimum, require that the following information is available for public viewing on court indices: (i) the case number(s) or docket code(s) or number(s); (ii) the date that the action was commenced; (iii) the names of the parties, counsel of record, and the assigned judge; (iv) the notation “case sealed”; (v) the case type and cause(s) of action, which may be obtained from the Civil Cover Sheet; (vi) the order to seal and written findings supporting the order; and (vii) the identity of the party or other person who filed the motion to seal.

Anything related to the sealing, why it was done and who sought the sealing, would be public record. And again, anything that is public record cannot be compelled to be confidential by agreement or otherwise. Just, stupid, the way the guy keeps flailing about with such obvious lies.

Compulsive liar is exactly what he is.

I don't think you'll ever give up your lying. It is too much ingrained in who you are. What I would suggest is you not do that shit around people who by and large are quite sharp.

[MaxPen]

Ok, so first, I am NOT trying to discredit Maxpen, who I have always liked. But we all know he is not impeccable as far as telling the truth. He clearly says things about mickeycrimm that aren't true. And mickey returns the favor. I take max pen at his word that he is motivated by finding the truth and not personal, although I have to say calling someone a fraud, as he did, feels very personal to me.

So I spent several hours last night trying to find exactly what MaxPen looked up. On July 3 he posted he had no idea how to look anything up, and 3 days later was the an expert. So the link that he said he used didn't work, but I was able to navigate my way. I knew were to find the case "I was interested in" because I have the case number. And I know that is all you are going to see....a case number. No plaintiff. No defendant. No attorney's involved. That is all under seal.

So again I wanted to see what that would look like for someone searching through a boatload of cases rather than going directly to that case via case #.. I spent two hours last night. Would have taken the better part of a full day to search everything. But in those two hours I found not only the case "I was interested in", but two additional cases that showed ONLY a case number. No further information. So I assume these cases were also sealed. So just extrapolating this out for all the cases that Maxpen looked at he must have come up with 10-12 cases like this? So what did you do with these cases Maxpen, just toss them aside as irrelevant?

Again, I can't and wont talk about much more. I don't think my very general comments above violates that agreement or my own principal (based on advice). Just some food for thought.

This is fake news. There was no cases that didn't have the plaintiff, defendant, and attorneys. There was a couple summaries that were not downloadable. But they involved corporate entities as the plaintiff. Anybody can go and review the entire docket for the period like I did. They will find the same thing I did.

KewlJ the great thing about this is it leaves no doubt. I'm sure if you could have found one case that failed to disclose the plaintiff and defendant you would have linked to it. I get it. Your desperate. You revealed yourself as a complete fraud. I'm sorry for you.

[Rob.Singer]

What a low-life and dishonest person you continue to prove yourself to be you fucking low-life foreigner.

For those that may not know, the above is my heading or whatever you want to call it that shows at Gambling forum, when I post...Less the doctored compulsive liar banner. That was doctored by Mdawg.

This is like posting a quote of someone and manually changing the words, which on many forums will get you banned or suspended.

Whatever your position on the matter being discussed, THIS kind of dishonest bullshit should be offensive to everyone. But I am sure it won't because it was done to me.

Waaaa....waaaa....what a wussy. Kew's being destroyed by anyone with at least half a brain, and he takes it out on somebody who simply added an undeniably truthful tag line to his GF avatar??

Follow V's advice kew--you've asked for it numerous times. Deflections about those whom you're envious of makes you look dumber than you've already proven you are.

You're the penultimate liar who's stuck in a VERY humiliating lie with no way out. No amount of whining, cry-babying, or diversions will help you out of this one. You're just a huge fool for ever starting a backrooming thread. Fess up, sad little loser.

[MaxPen]

recent[/B] civil cases he found today that have only the case # listed? Those cases have nothing to do with him, so he could provide those could he not?S

It seems that no record of his case being filed in Clark county can be found: that seems to be quite clear, at least based on what some sletuths have posted.

BUT (and it's a big but) as I speculated some time ago, what if his attorney filed in Federal, not county court?

Would the database(s) searched find such a filing?

As for the feds having subject matter jurisdiction, i.e. for them to have the ability to hear his case, there needs to be a recognized ground.

Perhaps diversity of citizenship, i.e. not all parties are deemed to be Nevada residents?

That seems unlikely, but if the casino is owned by a corporation in another state then it MIGHT apply, I'm not sure.

Or the guard could be a non-citzen, working at the casino on a green card or the equivalent, but again I am not sure.

The PI cases I filed were all in the county court system, not the federal: federal practice is a whole different thing.

I'd prefer to have the case exist than to conclude KJ lied to me; not that he owes me the truth, but I really wouldn't like it at all.

The only court it would go thru is the Eighth District. Besides KewlJ was up all night looking for a sealed case he could claim there...lol

There are zero cases that don't have a plaintiff, defendant, attorneys, and judges listed.

Also, almost every casino in the Valley had a case of some sort. Since they had elevator companies like Otis listed I'm Assuming those involved people stuck in elevators. Those mostly had multiple plaintiffs. I was surprised by the number of elevator cases. That seems to be a big problem for casinos.

[Gottlob1]

Oh, well, aside from my neighbor, Soxfan, I guess that you guys burn each other at the stake just to keep the lights on.

But, it was funny how Tasha left only days after I threw her a PM for a joke, out of the blue about V, supposedly, wanking off to her nonsense. Maybe, she believed it. Who knows.

Anyway, if people find what's left of this place, in about five hundred years, they'll be seriously wondering what the heck happened. On the other hand, if the AI-bots find it, first, as in a template for total annihilation, that will be the end of the people.

The dead reaching up from the earth to pull who ever's left back down.

[AxelWolf]

No one or thing in particular.

When dealing with type of stuff and people, I'm right 90% of the time on my first instincts. Whenever I happen to be off on my initial assessment, I get it right soon enough. Obvious people can change either way at some point.

[tableplay]

[MisterV]

But if you and others are unwilling to call out the blatant dishonesty shown by mdawg as part of this discussion, then don't anyone even suggest this is about getting to any kind if truth..

KJ, I and others have previously formed and solidified our opinions as to the veracity of MDawg and Rob Singer; the fact the the dawg is goofing with you and hanging the "compulsive liar" tag on you is nothing new from his bag of tricks and you should be able to roll with it.

The question is this: Did you invent the backroom story as a troll?

Tired of seeing MDawg and Singer trolling continuously, was it your plan to try to out-troll the trolls?

If so, you succeeded, at least to a point, as you certainly did provoke a troll-fest mega-reaction, myself included.

[Rob.Singer]

But if you and others are unwilling to call out the blatant dishonesty shown by mdawg as part of this discussion, then don't anyone even suggest this is about getting to any kind if truth..

KJ, I and others have previously formed and solidified our opinions as to the veracity of MDawg and Rob Singer; the fact the the dawg is goofing with you and hanging the "compulsive liar" tag on you is nothing new from his bag of tricks and you should be able to roll with it.

The question is this: Did you invent the backroom story as a troll?

Tired of seeing MDawg and Singer trolling continuously, was it your plan to try to out-troll the trolls?

If so, you succeeded, at least to a point, as you certainly did provoke a troll-fest mega-reaction, myself included.

V, kew in no way is in control of why he does what he does here. I said it the moment he came up with his foolish, fateful hoax. He wasn't getting nearly enuf of the attention he craves over the past several weeks. But as usual, he was ill-prepared, ill-advised, and ill-tempered, as you could easily determine by how often he had to walk-back yappy posts, how many missteps he made, and all the verifiable lies he told as he panicked his way through his fiasco.

I'd say "better luck next time" but something tells me he's staring at the deep end lately.