Originally Posted by MDawg;159703
V, can you weigh in here please? Here we have a further verifiable lie from the compulsive liar - that he found this recent case the one he claims is his with ONLY the case # listed, and no parties. ;) In fact, ask the compulsive liar to give us the court case #s of the two [B
recent[/B] civil cases he found today that have only the case # listed? Those cases have nothing to do with him, so he could provide those could he not?S
It seems that no record of his case being filed in Clark county can be found: that seems to be quite clear, at least based on what some sletuths have posted.
BUT (and it's a big but) as I speculated some time ago, what if his attorney filed in Federal, not county court?
Would the database(s) searched find such a filing?
As for the feds having subject matter jurisdiction, i.e. for them to have the ability to hear his case, there needs to be a recognized ground.
Perhaps diversity of citizenship, i.e. not all parties are deemed to be Nevada residents?
That seems unlikely, but if the casino is owned by a corporation in another state then it MIGHT apply, I'm not sure.
Or the guard could be a non-citzen, working at the casino on a green card or the equivalent, but again I am not sure.
The PI cases I filed were all in the county court system, not the federal: federal practice is a whole different thing.
I'd prefer to have the case exist than to conclude KJ lied to me; not that he owes me the truth, but I really wouldn't like it at all.