Originally Posted by
MisterV
Robert, I know that you and MDawg enjoy insultlng, defiling and inflicting pain on KJ but please ask yourself one question: "Why?"
I will often flame someone, insult them, but never to the degree and with the severity that you employ.
I'm just curious whether you can articulate a reason for your actions?
While we await Rob's answer, let me tell you what I think MrV.
Both are bullies and it is very easy now a days to be a bully on the internet.
Mdawg is very, very angry that I called out his fiction story and many of the details of his fiction story. Others did as well, but I kept at it longer than most, because he kept repeating it. So he blames me that despite his daily reports of winning on multiple forums, there just is little interest or response. If he posts a picture of a good cut of meat or a shirt he bought, or whatever nonsense he posted about charcoal toothpaste, he may generate an occasional response. But there just is very little interest on 3 forums no less in his continuing daily reports....and in his mind, that is my fault.
Singer needs an adversary. He always has. If you go back and read from a decade ago, Singer always needed an adversary and he always tried to brutally attack anyone who dared challenge his silly claims. Not just the person making the challenge, but he will attack and make up nasty lies about wives, children family members. This is actually an old mob tactic. It is suppose to serve as warning, a deterrent to others not to do the same thing or this will happen to you.
Both Singer and Mdawg have this crazy idea that if they can discredit whoever makes legitimate challenges of their claims, it somehow makes their claims more credible. Like I was caught and admitted lying about the lawsuit part of my recent incident. Does anybody think that made it more likely (or at all likely) that Rob Singer owned a Newell? Won a 1.5 million dollar Jackpot on a 10 play that the casino set up just for him and then regretted it? Played the double up bug? Are any of these more likely now?