Of course I'm referring to Las Vegas and Nevada.
Policies can be lifted for whomever a casino wants.
Regulations can be avoided for whomever a casino wants, unless leaked by an employee playing hall monitor, in which case the employee had best seek employment out of state.
Laws can be local as opposed to state, in which case Las Vegas has split jurisdictions, so one jurisdiction could play/leverage the other.
Do I believe MDawg won 50 out of 52 baccarat sessions? Well, no I don't. But one reason I don't hassle MDawg about his photos of chips or tales of cashing this and that is because if MDawg plays at the reported levels, which seems pretty certain, then whatever you quote as "policies" or "regulations" can and will be circumvented. If MDawg requested someone do something that isn't SOP, I'm sure casinos would bend over backwards to, as Jean-Luc Picard says, "make it so."
I have a hard time buying that "APs" operate in Las Vegas for decades and don't absolutely know these things.
I was challenged by some VCT idiots on a "policies" issue a few years back when I reported that I was paid for a large sports book futures win in "checks." By "checks" I was referring to chips, which management refers to as "checks" on many occasions. People on this board, who should know better, claimed it wasn't "policy" or "regulation" and one maroon couldn't fathom that chips were referred to as "checks." So I emailed Jimmy Vacarro out at South Point, and he was gracious enough to explain some "policies" in an email response, which I shared here.
Some folks who declare they know what they are talking about regarding sports here -- do not have any blessed clue about much of anything.
Reply With Quote