kewlJ

[MDawg]

What's incredible to me is how indecisive MisterV is about all of this. Where did you practice? Have you forgotten everything you learned? Or are you just committed to bending over backwards to allow UNKewlJ a sort of half ally as he flounders with all sorts of contradictory nonsense that any attorney worth his salt would realize is fabricated.

Okay maybe you don't know much about ACH and inter bank transfers because you practiced in the old days of paper checks only, but still, you know damn well that no attorney would link an account containing settlement funds with a client's account, if only for the reason that that would allow transfers back and forth between the two. There is no special kind of linkage that banks offer with only one way transfers permitted - either the external account is linked, or it is not.

Or, we return to the original version of the story, that this was just an ACH transfer sent by a third party processor, but then, oh well, UNKewlJ already retracted that version of the story and withdrew all his arguments about how "this is the way it is done" and "social security payments arrive after midnight so so did mine" after he realized that those arguments weren't passing muster.

Compulsive liar is a fair assessment of what he is. If people go back and look at your last few stories they will see a trend in you always changing the story after you get caught lying.

Now we're stuck with this farcical complicated version of the story where the attorney sets up a new account for every settlement at different banks and then links his "temporary" account with that of his client to allow the client full access "transparency."

I think kewlJ doesn't understand why so many people here dislike him.

It's not just that he lies. We've had lots of liars on this forum.

It's the seriousness with which kewlJ tells these lies, and then lashes out at those who doubt them. There's a certain arrogance to those posts, in the tone, "Of course this is fucking true, and you're a complete idiot for even doubting this."

[kewlJ]

Did you look this shit up Mdawg? This is very typical Mdawg changing fact (moving goalposts). Nothing was "linked" to an attorney's or law firm's actual account. At the end when it was time for the transfer, my account was linked to this temporary or escrow account, which I provided information to allow. And after this transfer, the temporary or escrow account was closed so there could be no further shenanigans. I suppose if I objected to this, it would have been handled differently. But if you have such an opinion of your attorney, the person you picked to represent you, that you think his firm would steal money from your personal account (obviously a felony), why would you have ever picked that person to represent you? My God.

MrV mentioned back in the day something about settlement money being placed in a lawfirms trust account. If there were other settlements at the same time would they also be co-mingled (mdawgs word) in this trust account? I think be setting up seperate escrow type accounts, money is never co-mingled with any other funds. The settlement money is transparent and accounted for every step of the way. Just my thoughts.

Now I see Mdawg has gone back in time 3 months harping on the fact that I mixed up legal terms like "defendent", when I posted about the experience.

Just like I said back then, I am not an attorney, same as I am not a banker, or real estate broker, or maybe even high end watch salesman who deals in such high end transactions on a regular basis. I am a mid level AP, who happens to share some experiences of things I have gone through, some that I go through for the first time. Get the fuck over it!

[MDawg]

No you are not an attorney, or a real estate broker, or any kind of blackjack player, you are a

[accountinquestion]

Just like I said back then, I am an attorney, same as I am a banker, and a real estate broker, and maybe even high end watch salesman who deals in such high end transactions on a regular basis. Get the fuck over it!

Waaait.. what ??

damn Mdawg got it while I was replying.

[kewlJ]

you know damn well that no attorney would link an account containing settlement funds with a client's account, if only for the reason that that would allow transfers back and forth between the two. There is no special kind of linkage that banks offer with only one way transfers permitted - either the external account is linked, or it is not.

At the time the accounts were linked, at the end of the process, the only remaining money in the escrow account was the money that was being transfer to me anyway. That is what this was all about. There was no possibility of anything nefarious. ZERO. I guess I could have gone in a day early and stolen my own money. There was no other money availabvle except what was being transferred to me.

Just because the great Mdawhg isn't familiar with how another law firm may do things, or doesn't know about this or that, only means he hasn't found it to read about when he googles things.

[kewlJ]

As MrV pointed out, this is a very provable lie. I am sure it isn't lost on everything that this is just doctored, which is the quintessential internet lie or dis-truth. I guess he gets a pass because people have decided they don't like me, so it is ok to lie.

But the hypocracy of someone photo-shopping and doctoring an image to assert that person a liar. Although people don't want to call him on it because they don't like the person he is lying about, he is proving just who he is with this kind of shit.

[MDawg]

At the time the accounts were linked, at the end of the process, the only remaining money in the escrow account was the money that was being transfer to me anyway.

When was this done? The same day of the transfer?

Think hard UNKewlJ, as you continue to fabricate this nonsense be careful lest you continue to say nonsense that further makes it clear the extent to which you are both stupid, and a liar.

And the very definition of an escrow account is one controlled by a third party. So whatever you are describing was not an escrow account. Obviously, from your first mention of this when you used the word "escrow" three months ago you were (supposedly) repeating what the attorney said to you. And then now you describe a process which is anything but an escrow account.

Why don't you just throw your hands up in the air, as you do typically when caught in multiple conflicting lies, and claim that you were "confused" or didn't know or understand what was going on - even though you just described a preposterous process that would never have happened, in (conflicting) detail.

[kewlJ]

At the time the accounts were linked, at the end of the process, the only remaining money in the escrow account was the money that was being transfer to me anyway.

When was this done? The same day of the transfer?

Think hard UNKewlJ, as you continue to fabricate this nonsense be careful lest you continue to say nonsense that further makes it clear the extent to which you are both stupid, and a liar.

Boy you are working hard at this just trying everything in your power to come up with something, regardless who you have to lie and change goalposts to do so.

I am done playing your witch hunt games. But good luck to you mansion boy. hey what happened to the mansion Mdawg? If you are an attorney which I am now doubting, you would know the guys that scrub the blood away, thinking they will get away with something, NEVER do.

[MDawg]

Of course you can't answer that question, without further research to make sure that you're not saying something obviously disprovable.

At the end when it was time for the transfer, my account was linked to this temporary or escrow account, which I provided information to allow.

So, what kind of information did you provide?

[kewlJ]

What happened to the mansion?

[MDawg]

Again, didn't think so. You never linked any account, the process you describe, the very timeline and the lack of credible details as to how you even allowed the linkage, proves it.

Just, so many conflicting details, even more in the past few days than ever.

You gotta understand, that anything UNKewlJ posts is based on theory - he doesn't actually play much if at all.

He spends all his days and nights thinking up lies to back up his nonsense. We just saw a few weeks of this with the backrooming fable. He doesn't have time for much else other than concocting nonsense and crying in rage over anything that doesn't gibe with his stay at home theory.

MaxPen on the UNKewl one: Compulsive liar is a fair assessment of what he is. If people go back and look at your last few stories they will see a trend in you always changing the story after you get caught lying.

[MDawg]

He'll stew for a while, and then...will come the 10x multiplier responses. All contradictory and desperate as he tries to clean up the contradictory lies he's been spouting for three days straight now.

[kewlJ]

And....what happened to the mansion?

[Rob.Singer]

And....what happened to the mansion?

The definition of true weakness.

[kewlJ]

The definition of true weakness.

...is driving to the RV dealership, climbing into an RV that isn't yours and taking and posting pictures online, pretending that it is.

At least MDawg didn't sink so low as to post pictures if someone else's mansion claiming that it was his.

Or claiming he has one just like it but it is across town and he didn't want to drive to his own.

You still take the cake Ron.

[Gottlob1]

You still take the cake Ron.

Living proof that there's no rock bottom on the internet, and, that such fools will never stop it. All of us should take such heed, before making the post that brings one over the edge. Know the meaning of enough.

[MDawg]

And now, as predicted, we have UNKewlJ's fourth version of the story.

1) UNKewlJ states that the “temporary” account his attorney set up was set up weeks earlier.

So there was an ACH transfer when the settlement money was transferred from the other party to the account that my attorney had set up at my financial institution, but that was weeks earlier.

2) But he also claims that this was done so that he could have “transparency” and view the money coming in and out of the account,

I think one of the reasons for this was for transparency. That I would be able to look at this account, view transactions and see where all moneys were going.

which implies that he would have had access to the account during all that time. Anyone with access to the account during that time could have linked an account to it, Zelle’d out funds, initiated a wire transfer, whatever. No way an attorney would allow anyone that kind of access.

He is forgetting that what he’s describing is just a standard bank account, there is no magical special access limitation available for such a thing. Anyone able to access the account would be able to transfer funds out at any time.

3) Trying hard to counter the notion that the attorney would not allow access to the account while all that money was in there (although he has already stated that the attorney DID allow him access to the account, for "transparency's" sake), now he is claiming that the account was “linked” only after all the funds except those belonging to him were withdrawn.

a. Withdrawn how, where? The attorney linked his own account to the account from day one, and then withdrew off his portion? And you had full access to the account all during those weeks, for “transparency”?

b. How did UNKewlJ even allow the linkage of his account? What information did he provide to the attorney, and when?

4) And of course now the latest version of this story is that the “linking” to his own account happened only at the very end of the process, after the account was drained of all the other money. lol

At the end when it was time for the transfer, my account was linked to this temporary or escrow account, which I provided information to allow.

Of course he has no explanation for when this was done, or how, because he made it all up, and is afraid to provide details on something that never happened, for fear of putting his little foot in his big mouth even more than he already has.

Again, you can’t access a bank account to see all this “transparency” that UNKewlJ claims is the reason the account was set up the account for in the first place, without having access to transfer funds out. Would be no way to stop that.

And the process that UNKewlJ describes, the timeline, is also implausible, because to link the accounts would require either giving the attorney full access to UNKewlJ’s own account, or a process that could not happen as quickly as just in a day or two. (Of course UNKewlJ doesn't know all this...because he never actually received any settlement, never actually linked with any account, never actually received a nickel...just continues desperately to make up some sort of story that might fit in with what he's read or heard about these things.)

Try again UNKewlJ!

[accountinquestion]

The whole thing seems idiotic at the core. "Transparency". How is having a 2nd account going to matter? Just so much wrong with this idea.



BTW I am curious about Mr V's mentioning that the interest rate in a trust account went to the state bar?? THat is a thing??

Dan Druff, please look into post limiting Kewl.

[MDawg]

You have to understand, I don't deal with this sort of thing, meaning...

money and checks and electronic transfers

every now and then. I deal with it every day. (Every banking day that is. Not non-banking days the way UNKewlLyingJ does in his imaginary little world.)

I receive ______ of dollars each year, from all sorts of business and sources, and I have bank accounts all over the country and world. I'm not guessing at how any of this works the way UNKewlJ is. I know.

I live it, I don't lie it.


Probably most everyone here knows more about how this sort of thing works, than UNKewlJ does, and is able to see through his nonsensical ever changing story.

Then, when the forum userbase turns out to be smarter than he expected and disproves some of them, we get the mea culpa that he wasn't telling the truth all along.

Just give it up UNKewlJ, admit you lied about all fourteen lies we've mentioned.

[Keystone]

The whole thing seems idiotic at the core. "Transparency". How is having a 2nd account going to matter? Just so much wrong with this idea.



BTW I am curious about Mr V's mentioning that the interest rate in a trust account went to the state bar?? THat is a thing??

Dan Druff, please look into post limiting Kewl.

Ive never seen so many fucks worry about some guy(?) they never have even met

Bunch of fucking weirdos