kewlJ

[Mission146]

Otherwise you're inferring that you can make whatever unsubstantiated claims you like, but others cannot and should be subject to admin moderation. It's not that members of this forum decided they don't like you, but more that hypocrisy tends to rub people the wrong way. You want rules enforced as long as they don't apply to you.

I have nothing against you KJ. You even come off as a good dude much of the time, but Singer is right... you're creating your own hell here.

The one that really got me is that Doxxing is totally cool as long as it is not an AP you are Doxxing. LMAO!!!

It's like, "WHAT!?" Would KewlJ create a new tax for people, but exempt only those who are his exact height?

I'm just giving you shit, KewlJ, but that was a funny one.

Mission, have you visited and read Dan Druff Poker fraud forum at all? The top thread is a thread now some 750 pages long about youtube scammer Christopher Mitchel. Dan Druff and his membership, lead by Druff himself and his investigations have revealed all kind of things about this Christopher Mitchel person, including addresses, past employment, cars he drives among other things. This is all doxing! Any personal information you reveal about a person that they did not reveal is doxing.

Druff and his co-horts seem to think this is OK because Mitchel is on youtube soliciting money as part of his scam. Well I don't distinguish the soliciting part as much as others do. Scamming and misleading people with false bullshit that will have them lose their money is scamming...period. The solicitation just takes it to a higher level.

Mdawg is scamming people with mis-information that anyone trying what he claims will be hurt financially, and backed off and barred for attempting a 1-50 spread and I could list 100 things.

So if it is OK to dox Mitchel and reveal anything you find that contradicts his bullshit claims, and I believe it is, and Druff himself justifies that, I see no difference in doing so with Mdawg. The information that comes to light will prove he is not who he claims and not winning as he claims. It will prove the Mdawg adventure, nothing more than a scam, not all that different than Christopher mitchel, except Mitchel takes it a step further with the solicitaion of money.

Again, the pertinent question is why does someone like Mdawg not use his real name if he has nothing to hide. He isn't hiding from the casinos like most APs are. He plays rated, making sure they know who he is, to get every ounce of comps due him. So the only people he is hiding from are the members of these different forums who would find out who he really is and what his story really is.

Now there are a lot of people on this forum of late that no longer believe me or anything I say or any part of my claims. Or at least that is what they say, i don't really believe that. So they essentially think I am the same kind of scammer I am accusing Mdawg of being. Ok fine, If anybody can prove that, prove that I am Tom Reilly, living in Albuquerque, working as a night watchman and not who I claim, then they are free to do that. If they can prove that I am Sally Hutton, living in Vegas, but working at the dollar store and not who/what I claim, they should and are free to do that. If they can prove any of the ridiculous claims, male prostitution, to about 100 other things, that would prove my claims false and me a scammer, they should do that. That would be doxxing, but I think that would be fair game because I would have been misleading or scamming people.

But the fact is nobody can or has proven a damn thing like that. All they do is make up silly, silly shit, with no proof, just attempting to discredit or smear me.

In short, I believe doxxing a person misleading, or scamming, myself included is justifiable if it proves they are not who they claim in misleading people. Whether that be a Christopher Mitchel who takes it to the next level with the solicitation, or an Mdawg, who is such an expert manipulator with his picture and shit, or me, if I am not who I say and claim.

As has already been pointed out, CM is a person who scams people out of money by selling supposedly winning methods and systems. If you want to define the word, 'Scam' in such a way to include things that are non-monetary, decide that all scammers should be Doxxed, determine that MDawg is a scammer pursuant to what you think a scammer is, then subsequently Doxx (or attempt to Doxx him), then that is your prerogative. As you have already figured out, almost nobody agrees with your position on one, or multiple, aspects of that one. You stand all but alone on that, though I don't suppose you mind standing all but alone.

Beyond that, that's something that occurs over on PFA. That's one of the purposes of the site. It wouldn't matter whether CM participates on that site, or not, if he is doing what he does.

In the case of MDawg, you are trying to satisfy a personal vendetta brought about by his participation on the forums. You cannot tolerate that MDawg was tolerated by, and allowed to remain at, WoV. Had MDawg been Nuked from WoV, you would not have taken the action of attempting to Doxx him. I know this because you have not attempted to figure out who that MarcusClark and Doxx him. MarcusClark was demonstrated to have been lying. Where's his info at?

If you want to dress up a personal vendetta as some more noble grander cause in your own mind, then that's fine. If you want to try to sell that narrative to others, that's none of my business; however, I will not be bullshitted on this one.

Even ignoring all of that, I do not run PFA or dictate PFA"s policy. I haven't even said that I support PFA's policy of allowing Doxxing of certain people, but that's what PFA does and I participate on PFA.

Let me put it this way: If I knew Professor Slots' address (which I don't), I wouldn't even share it privately. I have a duty to warn that Professor Slots is selling bullshit slot systems. Actually, I don't even have specific animosity to The Nutty Professor; he was just a good example to use to warn people of that sort of thing, in general.

I certainly wouldn't target Professor Slots personally; he has done nothing to me.

MDawg has already prevailed in one such attempt to do just that. I am willing to arbitrate should terms be agreed to on a second attempt. I forget who I offered it to, but I actually offered to arbitrate on the first one. I consider myself pretty good at figuring out angles, and shit like that, so I think that I would have been more aggressive than Wizard was. That's not to say that I would have found anything because Dawg might substantially be telling the truth. In theory, he could be telling the entire truth. I did have one specific angle that I know wasn't pursued as it was not mentioned. Were MDawg lying, though I'm not saying he was, he'd have never seen my angle coming. He'd not have had a chance to prepare for it.

Once again, your double standard on the need to use one's real name, essentially, if one is not an AP, is patently ridiculous. Almost nobody uses their real names on these forums, which makes sense, because some of these fucking people populating these forums are bananas. If you want to start a forum in which all who participate, except verified and vetted AP's, must use their real names, then do that. I can't imagine anyone would participate there under those rules.

So, MDawg comes around telling stories about his casino adventures and must now make his real name known? Why? Justify that position. You can't; it's ridiculous.

I can't know what to believe or not believe from you anymore, but I am neither richer nor poorer due to my inability to take anything you say at face value. I don't dispute any of your claims, but nor would I defend you and say that your claims are most likely true. I can only say now that the Blackjack play aspect of your story has been very consistent for more than a decade.

Is literally anything else except your Blackjack play true? I'd have to say probably not. I also couldn't go to bat for your Blackjack play other than to say your story vis-a-vis stakes/style/approach has always been consistent.

On the other hand, other aspects of your story were once very consistent---and you have now said those are a lie, so who the hell knows?

Even if you were a 'Scammer,' which is still not a way I would ever use that word, how would one specifically disprove your tales? Also, why should anyone care?

Let's say that everything that you have ever said is a lie, just as a hypothetical. Everything. Every single word. How does that change my life? Why would it matter to me? You don't owe me honesty. How are you indebted to me? You're not.

Believe what you will. What you believe is none of my concern, and as long as your vendetta against MDawg persists, I don't expect to compel you to believe otherwise.

The one thing that would concern me is why you would think, if an MDawg is not to be protected from Doxxing, why people who would not protect MDawg WOULD protect AP's? Why do APs deserve protection if others don't? Their fucking livelihoods? We contribute nothing to society.

No. There's only one reason APs should be protected from Doxxing; it is because everyone should be protected from Doxxing. In the case of Druff, he would say everyone except those doing scamming and causing financial injury to other gamblers.

[kewlJ]

Garnabby is correct. (OMG did I just write that?) I am not some super math math guy, like many in the AP world. That is probably why I stick to what I stick to. You don't have to be. I would say I am above average of the general population in math ability, but way, way below average of advantage players. I know my place.

BUT Gambling is about Math. Advantage play is about Math. Math is the difference between long-term winning players (AP's) and long-term losing players (ploppies or degen gamblers).

Now some players understand the math, but still choose to play -EV, enjoying that. That would be a MrV. That is fine.

BUT when someone claims to be a long-term winning player, they better have something mathematical that makes it so. Because Math is required. Saying you "play into hot streaks" or "win because you have a large bankroll" or have some kind of even less optimal (by the math) "special plays" just doesn't cut it. That is all voodoo crap, not math.

Gambling is Math. Winning at Gambling is Math. So claims that defy the math, just don't work Granabby. I really don't think that is too much to ask.

[kewlJ]

Let me put it this way: If I knew Professor Slots' address (which I don't), I wouldn't even share it privately. I have a duty to warn that Professor Slots is selling bullshit slot systems. Actually, I don't even have specific animosity to The Nutty Professor; he was just a good example to use to warn people of that sort of thing, in general.

I certainly wouldn't target Professor Slots personally; he has done nothing to me.

I don't know who Professor slots is, but I can use my imagination. So sticking with this example, if you had information about Professor slot, that directly proved his claims were BS, would that be wrong to post so those being scammed could see? I just don't think that is so terrible.

Now you mentioned posting an address. I didn't do that. I wouldn't do that. Yet Mdawg did that to/about me. All I did was post information so people would be able to look into the person if they wanted and see for themselves the claims of all that winning were, just as most suspected, a fabricated fantasy.

And again, if somebody has the kind of information on me, proving that I am an orderly in a hospital, or work at a burger joint, or any of the ridiculous claims people say, they should post it. But nobody has that information so they can't. Instead they just make up stupid shit, like Male prostitue, homeless living in the tunnels.

And what is really bizarre is that both people that have been able to find me, or information about me, The late Moses and Mdawg, actually proved my claims. they both almost immediately regretted that, so they immediately pivoted and just continued making other shit up. They actuall began posting lies and shit that contradict what they doxxed and proved. Only on the fucked up internet forums.

[coach belly]

verified and vetted APs

Is there a certifying authority and certification process for this?

How about certified source material for "the way Las Vegas works"?

[kewlJ]

Ok, I am heading out (to work actually), but while I was in the shower getting ready I thought of a simplier better way to phrase this, so I want to take one more pass at it, although I am sure it won't matter.

If someone is using the anonymity that the internet and internet forums afford them through "handles", for nefarious purposes of no good, whether it be scamming people by solicitation, down to just scamming people with mis-information that can lead to people being harmed who try to emulate, then I don't see anything wrong with providing some information, if you have it in regards to who that person really is, so the people that might be harmed can see for themselves that this person hasn't won this or that or isn't a professional slot player, blackjack player, what have you.

And that is very different that just doxing or revealing information about someone just because you don't like them.

The second I would call doxing, while the first is exposing someone with nefarious intent, for people to see who they really are.

Thank you and Good Evening.

[coach belly]

nefarious purposes of no good

Regarding this forum, you have no standing to make this determination.

You are a proven and admitted liar, you do not occupy a moral high ground.

[AxelWolf]

Well, yea.. Everything but the second sentence. I still like Mdawg

We all have some major faults. I won't hold that against you.

PloppyDawg claims he's playing with an advantage. There are multiple posts that clearly suggest the contrary. I just happened to accidentally click on this one since it's at the beginning of one of these threads.

Read this and tell me this guy knows anything about Advantage play.

No one's trying to make a living at gambling. But at the same time, if I lost money at it I wouldn't continue with it. I just somehow have managed to stay ahead, and the only dent they have made in my progress was when they banned (handicapped) my BJ play. To summarize, they got tired of my wild fluctuations between table min and table max at double deck BJ and that I was winning all of my table max bets including many double downs. Obviously the count alone could not have justified such luck, but after this went on for a number of days on yet another winning trip, the casino I was playing at, owned by Steve Wynn, stepped in and "handicapped" me - to a 3X spread.

"From now on if you bet $25. on a hand, you can't bet more than three times that, $75., on the next. No more $25. $2500. $25. $2500."

The limit at that time was $2500. This wasn't that long ago actually, about twenty or so years ago, but that was the limit at that casino at that time, $2500. This was when I was barely of legal age to gamble, but I had been playing blackjack and other card games since I was about eight years old, for fun, so I may have been relatively new to casinos but not new to playing cards.

After the BJ "ban" (handicap), I stayed away from Vegas entirely for almost two years, came back to the same casino, kept playing the same way, won for a matter of hours only, and got booted again from BJ.

Then I switched to Baccarat, and won even more at it than I had ever won at BJ. Eventually I became friends with the Director of Table Games who had set the handicap on me, who had since transferred to a different Wynn casino on the Strip, and he let me resume BJ play, and even laughed about how I liked to alternate between table min and max. But for whatever reason, I never really went back so hard to BJ, and have stuck with Baccarat. I just feel more comfortable betting big at Bacc.

I still play double deck BJ occasionally, but there is only one casino on the strip where they stand on soft 17 double deck BJ, so I pretty much play BJ at that casino only. There is one other casino, off the strip, where the double deck BJ is not only stand 17 but allows resplit aces and comes to a 0.14 house edge, but I am banned entirely from that casino - they fear me.

To clarify about Mdawg being his own #1 fan. I just have no clue. It is sorta beyond the realm of actual real gambling so I have no interest. Chip porn is kinda cool.

I really just don't read what the guy says because it doesn't interest me. I also don't read Kewl's stuff about Mdawg. I read Mdawg's anti-Kewl stuff much closer and.. well.. he's relentless. I just read it in awe.

Much like Singer I can never tell where the joke vs the serious starts and stops. Probably far more seriousness with these guys .. I just can't imagine.

Singer brought a good time to this forum with his preposterous tales complete with his weird documentation. Ducking MaxPen and whomever else. Mdawg's basic story though isn't that.

And to sum it up. You're flat out wrong about Mdawg being his #1 fan. He is #2. Kewl is #1. Same with Singer's #1 fan. ha!

I think you missed the running joke> Marcus Clark self-proclaimed(I believe they even had it in his signature) number one fan of the Mdawg fan club claimed to have learned a significant amount from MDawg who inspired him to bet big with lots of winning stories( It all stunk to hell from the very beginning).

He made up an entire story about betting big(10k?) and winning on some new table game. Little did he know someone was directly involved with, or had knowledge of that particular table game. It turns out the table limit on this game was even close to that amount. Apparently, he was permanently banned due to this situation.

Don't let your disdain for KJ Cloud your judgment about MD.

[Treeshade]

We all have some major faults. I won't hold that against you.

PloppyDawg claims he's playing with an advantage. There are multiple posts that clearly suggest the contrary. I just happened to accidentally click on this one since it's at the beginning of one of these threads.

Read this and tell me this guy knows anything about Advantage play.

No one's trying to make a living at gambling. But at the same time, if I lost money at it I wouldn't continue with it. I just somehow have managed to stay ahead, and the only dent they have made in my progress was when they banned (handicapped) my BJ play. To summarize, they got tired of my wild fluctuations between table min and table max at double deck BJ and that I was winning all of my table max bets including many double downs. Obviously the count alone could not have justified such luck, but after this went on for a number of days on yet another winning trip, the casino I was playing at, owned by Steve Wynn, stepped in and "handicapped" me - to a 3X spread.

"From now on if you bet $25. on a hand, you can't bet more than three times that, $75., on the next. No more $25. $2500. $25. $2500."

The limit at that time was $2500. This wasn't that long ago actually, about twenty or so years ago, but that was the limit at that casino at that time, $2500. This was when I was barely of legal age to gamble, but I had been playing blackjack and other card games since I was about eight years old, for fun, so I may have been relatively new to casinos but not new to playing cards.

After the BJ "ban" (handicap), I stayed away from Vegas entirely for almost two years, came back to the same casino, kept playing the same way, won for a matter of hours only, and got booted again from BJ.

Then I switched to Baccarat, and won even more at it than I had ever won at BJ. Eventually I became friends with the Director of Table Games who had set the handicap on me, who had since transferred to a different Wynn casino on the Strip, and he let me resume BJ play, and even laughed about how I liked to alternate between table min and max. But for whatever reason, I never really went back so hard to BJ, and have stuck with Baccarat. I just feel more comfortable betting big at Bacc.

I still play double deck BJ occasionally, but there is only one casino on the strip where they stand on soft 17 double deck BJ, so I pretty much play BJ at that casino only. There is one other casino, off the strip, where the double deck BJ is not only stand 17 but allows resplit aces and comes to a 0.14 house edge, but I am banned entirely from that casino - they fear me.

To clarify about Mdawg being his own #1 fan. I just have no clue. It is sorta beyond the realm of actual real gambling so I have no interest. Chip porn is kinda cool.

I really just don't read what the guy says because it doesn't interest me. I also don't read Kewl's stuff about Mdawg. I read Mdawg's anti-Kewl stuff much closer and.. well.. he's relentless. I just read it in awe.

Much like Singer I can never tell where the joke vs the serious starts and stops. Probably far more seriousness with these guys .. I just can't imagine.

Singer brought a good time to this forum with his preposterous tales complete with his weird documentation. Ducking MaxPen and whomever else. Mdawg's basic story though isn't that.

And to sum it up. You're flat out wrong about Mdawg being his #1 fan. He is #2. Kewl is #1. Same with Singer's #1 fan. ha!

I think you missed the running joke> Marcus Clark self-proclaimed(I believe they even had it in his signature) number one fan of the Mdawg fan club claimed to have learned a significant amount from MDawg who inspired him to bet big with lots of winning stories( It all stunk to hell from the very beginning).

He made up an entire story about betting big(10k?) and winning on some new table game. Little did he know someone was directly involved with, or had knowledge of that particular table game. It turns out the table limit on this game was even close to that amount. Apparently, he was permanently banned due to this situation.

Don't let your disdain for KJ Cloud your judgment about MD.

You still don’t know he’s doing?

[AxelWolf]

We all have some major faults. I won't hold that against you.

PloppyDawg claims he's playing with an advantage. There are multiple posts that clearly suggest the contrary. I just happened to accidentally click on this one since it's at the beginning of one of these threads.

Read this and tell me this guy knows anything about Advantage play.

No one's trying to make a living at gambling. But at the same time, if I lost money at it I wouldn't continue with it. I just somehow have managed to stay ahead, and the only dent they have made in my progress was when they banned (handicapped) my BJ play. To summarize, they got tired of my wild fluctuations between table min and table max at double deck BJ and that I was winning all of my table max bets including many double downs. Obviously the count alone could not have justified such luck, but after this went on for a number of days on yet another winning trip, the casino I was playing at, owned by Steve Wynn, stepped in and "handicapped" me - to a 3X spread.

"From now on if you bet $25. on a hand, you can't bet more than three times that, $75., on the next. No more $25. $2500. $25. $2500."

The limit at that time was $2500. This wasn't that long ago actually, about twenty or so years ago, but that was the limit at that casino at that time, $2500. This was when I was barely of legal age to gamble, but I had been playing blackjack and other card games since I was about eight years old, for fun, so I may have been relatively new to casinos but not new to playing cards.

After the BJ "ban" (handicap), I stayed away from Vegas entirely for almost two years, came back to the same casino, kept playing the same way, won for a matter of hours only, and got booted again from BJ.

Then I switched to Baccarat, and won even more at it than I had ever won at BJ. Eventually I became friends with the Director of Table Games who had set the handicap on me, who had since transferred to a different Wynn casino on the Strip, and he let me resume BJ play, and even laughed about how I liked to alternate between table min and max. But for whatever reason, I never really went back so hard to BJ, and have stuck with Baccarat. I just feel more comfortable betting big at Bacc.

I still play double deck BJ occasionally, but there is only one casino on the strip where they stand on soft 17 double deck BJ, so I pretty much play BJ at that casino only. There is one other casino, off the strip, where the double deck BJ is not only stand 17 but allows resplit aces and comes to a 0.14 house edge, but I am banned entirely from that casino - they fear me.

To clarify about Mdawg being his own #1 fan. I just have no clue. It is sorta beyond the realm of actual real gambling so I have no interest. Chip porn is kinda cool.

I really just don't read what the guy says because it doesn't interest me. I also don't read Kewl's stuff about Mdawg. I read Mdawg's anti-Kewl stuff much closer and.. well.. he's relentless. I just read it in awe.

Much like Singer I can never tell where the joke vs the serious starts and stops. Probably far more seriousness with these guys .. I just can't imagine.

Singer brought a good time to this forum with his preposterous tales complete with his weird documentation. Ducking MaxPen and whomever else. Mdawg's basic story though isn't that.

And to sum it up. You're flat out wrong about Mdawg being his #1 fan. He is #2. Kewl is #1. Same with Singer's #1 fan. ha!

I think you missed the running joke> Marcus Clark self-proclaimed(I believe they even had it in his signature) number one fan of the Mdawg fan club claimed to have learned a significant amount from MDawg who inspired him to bet big with lots of winning stories( It all stunk to hell from the very beginning).

He made up an entire story about betting big(10k?) and winning on some new table game. Little did he know someone was directly involved with, or had knowledge of that particular table game. It turns out the table limit on this game was even close to that amount. Apparently, he was permanently banned due to this situation.

Don't let your disdain for KJ Cloud your judgment about MD.

You still don’t know he’s doing?

Are you asking if I still don't know exactly what Mdawg is doing?

I only have my theories and those theories don't involve any significant Advantage Play and he is a -EV gambler overall and he is not winning to the tune of what and how he claims and would have us believe.

If he is an actual Advantage Player doing some of the things he claims, then he has been purposely deceiving us and has gone out of his way to talk and act like a -EV player.

Just one statement/post alone that he has made is enough for me and many others to believe he is full of s***.

There have been so many of those, but let's just take a look at this one/.... He claims to have 50 hands of black hands of blackjack in a row. Sure he was able to weasel his way out of that statement with Mike by pointing out he used the the word some after the word 50. But, we all know damn well exactly what he was saying and what he meant. How do we know 50 some didn't mean above 50. I mean was it maybe 45, 46 47 48 49 in a row?

You can go back and look at a post where he claims he can do just about every known table games AP move. Shuffle tracking, Ace sequencing, card steering, Counting, Edge sorting, or whatever the f*** he was claiming. I don't remember how many or exactly what, it's probably just the more well-known AP moves that he read or heard about and claimed it.

I do remember him telling a story about how he was invited back to a casino or some nonsense after being kicked out/backed off. He claimed he made some type of nonsense promise to the manager/host or whomever, that he would no longer engage in any type of +Ev shenanigans or whatever. I don't remember exactly what the deal was that he claimed. I just remember reading it and saying what the f*** is this nonsense b*******. And, if that's the case and he's been lying to us about not engaging in that type of stuff anymore. The dude has basically said that he doesn't need Advantage to play to win he just needs to know how to read shoes and whatnot. I'm not going to go back and search at this point, I know what he said, I know what he meant, I know what he was saying.

[MDawg]

UNKewlJ’s crazy ideas about whom it is okay to doxx and whom it is not okay to doxx, are as misguided and inconsistent as most everything he has to say. He’s weak, he’s stupid, and he’s a liar, and there isn’t much more anyone here can do to hurt him more than he hurts himself every day when he expends all his energy in continued desperate attempts to prove that his stories are anything more than lies.

Just the fact that he can’t even stay away from forums that he has declared dozens of times that he must quit, is proof of the torture that goes on inside him daily.

Junior psychologist AccountinQuestion continues with the slicing open of the UNKewl one, yes, like a fish!

I'm not sure what to think of Singer but at the end of the day he laughs most of this shit off. You can't. That's pretty much the sum of this whole situation between you 2.

[Mission146]

Let me put it this way: If I knew Professor Slots' address (which I don't), I wouldn't even share it privately. I have a duty to warn that Professor Slots is selling bullshit slot systems. Actually, I don't even have specific animosity to The Nutty Professor; he was just a good example to use to warn people of that sort of thing, in general.

I certainly wouldn't target Professor Slots personally; he has done nothing to me.

I don't know who Professor slots is, but I can use my imagination. So sticking with this example, if you had information about Professor slot, that directly proved his claims were BS, would that be wrong to post so those being scammed could see? I just don't think that is so terrible.

Now you mentioned posting an address. I didn't do that. I wouldn't do that. Yet Mdawg did that to/about me. All I did was post information so people would be able to look into the person if they wanted and see for themselves the claims of all that winning were, just as most suspected, a fabricated fantasy.

And again, if somebody has the kind of information on me, proving that I am an orderly in a hospital, or work at a burger joint, or any of the ridiculous claims people say, they should post it. But nobody has that information so they can't. Instead they just make up stupid shit, like Male prostitue, homeless living in the tunnels.

And what is really bizarre is that both people that have been able to find me, or information about me, The late Moses and Mdawg, actually proved my claims. they both almost immediately regretted that, so they immediately pivoted and just continued making other shit up. They actuall began posting lies and shit that contradict what they doxxed and proved. Only on the fucked up internet forums.

Professor Slots is less objectively evil CM; he actually seems like a fairly nice guy. I'm conflicted as to whether or not he actually takes his own snake oil. I'd probably be even more lenient in my opinion if I could be sure he actually believes what he's saying. The fact that he charges money for information obviously increases my skepticism. I've offered advice both publicly and privately, and unless it goes into an article, I make a point NOT to charge for most anything I do.

His claims are mathematically invalid on their face. There's nothing to 'prove wrong,' per se. His claims that don't strictly relate to the math of slot machines are, at best, spurious; they are also often inconsistent with themselves.

An address is just an example. I wouldn't post his real name, or share it privately, even if I knew it as that could lead to someone getting his address. In short, I would not share non-volunteered private information about him, or anyone else, either publicly or privately. He is doing what he does online, so if I am going to counter him at all, my countering will also be restricted to online.

Another key difference between he and CM is that I think Professor Slots has some amount of class. I would sit down and have a discussion with him. I actually offered that at the end of the article:

https://wizardofvegas.com/articles/the-nutty-professor/

With that, should he happen to read this and consider anything that I have said unfair, then I will accept a one hour Zoom meeting with him (I won’t even charge for my service) where he is free to offer a rebuttal to anything that I have said and we can have a debate as to the merits of his strategies.

You might concern yourself with that this gives him credibility, or a platform, but if I am going to challenge him, then I must also offer him the opportunity to defend himself against my challenges. That's especially true if I am also going to dictate the terms by which I will allow him to rebut me directly. Naturally, I received no response along these lines.

If you were homeless and living in the tunnels, hypothetically speaking, then I am not sure how someone would go about 'proving' that. One would first need a person who is meant to be KewlJ, then one would have to prove that this physical person is, in fact, KewlJ, then one would have to prove that this physical person lives in the tunnels.

Besides, your account is one of being a mid-level Blackjack card counter; I can't imagine what would ever make that worth going to the effort of disproving, but as mentioned, many of the participants here (myself included) are quite insane; I am just not insane in that way. It's actually more than a little alarming that I should be the adult in any room; I'm really not the best choice for the voice of reason, but I go where I am needed.

[Mission146]

verified and vetted APs

Is there a certifying authority and certification process for this?

How about certified source material for "the way Las Vegas works"?

Yes. In my hypothetical, the 'Certifying authority and certification process,' would be whatever KewlJ believes is satisfactory, as it would be his forum.

In light of the recent video that Crimm linked to, I would say anyone who has ever argued that there is not substantial money in multicarding would be immediately disqualified.

[Gottlob1]

Did any of that stuff come with a list of countermeasures, illegalities, common knowledge of, and, say, consequences of, as anything to detract from? The reason that the idiotic podcasts in general don't. So much baloney built up into a special sort and degree of bullshit.

[coach belly]

whatever KewlJ believes is satisfactory

That's the condition we have now, and there are participants.

So why would he need to start another forum?

But hypotheticals aside, is that what you really meant by "vetted"?

[MisterV]

UNKewlJ’s crazy ideas about whom it is okay to doxx and whom it is not okay to doxx, are as misguided and inconsistent as most everything he has to say. He’s weak, he’s stupid, and he’s a liar...

Thus Spoke Zarathustra...I mean, thus brayed the antagonistic narcissist.

[coach belly]

So much baloney built up into a special sort and degree of bullshit.

Within the first 2 minutes of the podcast, the guest asserts that coin-in creates an illusion of play.

I wonder what constitutes actual play, if coin-in is an illusion.

[Mission146]

whatever KewlJ believes is satisfactory

That's the condition we have now, and there are participants.

So why would he need to start another forum?

But hypotheticals aside, is that what you really meant by "vetted"?

How could I put the hypothetical aside when the hypothetical is literally the only context in which I was using, 'Vetted?' If I put the hypothetical aside, then I wouldn't have used the word in that sentence; therefore, I would not have meant anything by it.

For one thing, if KewlJ wishes for there to be a Forum requirement that people who are not AP's post under real name, or in the alternative, that people who he doesn't believe can be Doxxed, then he would have to start a new one. As far as I am aware, there are no gambling forums with those rules.

[Mission146]

So much baloney built up into a special sort and degree of bullshit.

Within the first 2 minutes of the podcast, the guest asserts that coin-in creates an illusion of play.

I wonder what constitutes actual play, if coin-in is an illusion.

Which one? The one that Crimm linked to? You can either learn shit or not learn shit. The choice is yours. The information contained in that podcast is both fair and substantially accurate.

[kewlJ]

For one thing, if KewlJ wishes for there to be a Forum requirement that people who are not AP's post under real name, or in the alternative, that people who he doesn't believe can be Doxxed, then he would have to start a new one. As far as I am aware, there are no gambling forums with those rules.

Come on Mission. That is NOT what I said. No 2 tiers. What I am saying is if someone is going to pull this shit where all they do is mislead members with fantasy BS claims, then it is fair game to exposed them and what they are really winning or losing as opposed to these misleading BS claims.

If you are going to use the anonymity of forums to try to hurt people, the you forfeit that anonymity.

[coach belly]

people who he doesn't believe can be Doxxed

Aren't we participating under those conditions right now?