Math vs fantasy

[PositiveVariance]

One of the big problems with Spikes system is the fact that he uses past results to identify numbers with a higher probability of occuring. Yes, I realize he acknowledges that past outcomes have no affect on future results, and I am not going in that direction with this...

So ultimately, he claims he has a method that can identify numbers or pockets of numbers, that hit at a higher rate than should randomly occur. Let's put aside the lol aspect of this for just a minute...

Spike, do you know why Roulette wheel clocking isn't really a thing in 2023? Displayed are screens that display the past x number of numbers for the Ploppies to study. Do you know what this also allows the casino to do? It allows the casino to store an analyze the numbers via a simple piece of software.

I have no idea how long this software has been available, but I was first made aware of it in 2018. Technically, you don't even need a software, just a few lines of simple code that analyzes the frequency of the numbers. It's very simple, especially since the data is already being stored by the casino.

Bottom line, whatever is causing certain numbers or pockets of numbers to hit more frequently will be first identified by the casino, especially if the bias is significant. Whatever is causing the non random outcomes will be quickly identified. It could be a bias wheel, string over the pocket, Faulty RNG, ect. They are first to know. Also, you still need to overcome 5.26%, just to get to "even" - then you are in positive territory.

Does every casino have this? No. It is only a matter of time.

But let me guess... Only the Great Spike is smart enough to see this?

[Spike]

So ultimately, he claims he has a method that can identify numbers or pockets of numbers, that hit at a higher rate than should randomly occur.

Nope, that is absolutely not what I do. I look for patterns and trends and domination and base my educated guess on that. I often look for patterns within patterns, a big pattern is going on while a smaller pattern is happening inside of it. This takes a lot of observation and a lot of training and a lot of trial and error. Now people will go haha, there are no patterns in random outcomes. This is true what you think you see is not really a pattern it's just a coincidence but you can still use this to your advantage. I'm talking about events that happen in the extreme short term, they only last for a spin or two or three and then they're gone. Certain things have to be happening in conjunction with other things that are happening that triggers a bet for me. I'm sorry if this sounds confusing but that's the way it is.

[TomasHClines]

But let me guess... Only the Great Spike is smart enough to see this?

---> These are the times that try men's souls.

https://anagram-solver.net/But%20let...s?partial=true

[MaxPen]

Nope, that is absolutely not what I do. I look for patterns and trends and domination and base my educated guess on that. I often look for patterns within patterns, a big pattern is going on while a smaller pattern is happening inside of it. This takes a lot of observation and a lot of training and a lot of trial and error. Now people will go haha, there are no patterns in random outcomes. This is true what you think you see is not really a pattern it's just a coincidence but you can still use this to your advantage. I'm talking about events that happen in the extreme short term, they only last for a spin or two or three and then they're gone. Certain things have to be happening in conjunction with other things that are happening that triggers a bet for me. I'm sorry if this sounds confusing but that's the way it is.

You should hire Rob.Singer for lessons. You're not good at this...RIP

[soxfan]

So ultimately, he claims he has a method that can identify numbers or pockets of numbers, that hit at a higher rate than should randomly occur.

Nope, that is absolutely not what I do. I look for patterns and trends and domination and base my educated guess on that. I often look for patterns within patterns, a big pattern is going on while a smaller pattern is happening inside of it. This takes a lot of observation and a lot of training and a lot of trial and error. Now people will go haha, there are no patterns in random outcomes. This is true what you think you see is not really a pattern it's just a coincidence but you can still use this to your advantage. I'm talking about events that happen in the extreme short term, they only last for a spin or two or three and then they're gone. Certain things have to be happening in conjunction with other things that are happening that triggers a bet for me. I'm sorry if this sounds confusing but that's the way it is.

My challenge is till open, spikey. I'll pony up real, double zero roulettes result and you play against them and show us all yer roulettes prowess. I know you claim a 88% strikes rate but for purpose of my challenge I'll only require you capture a mere 58% strikes rate. If you can manage that then I'll declare you to be the best roulettes cat of all times and I'll put a cool risk free, taxes free 1k in yer pockets, hey hey!!!!

[Spike]

So ultimately, he claims he has a method that can identify numbers or pockets of numbers, that hit at a higher rate than should randomly occur.

Nope, that is absolutely not what I do. I look for patterns and trends and domination and base my educated guess on that. I often look for patterns within patterns, a big pattern is going on while a smaller pattern is happening inside of it. This takes a lot of observation and a lot of training and a lot of trial and error. Now people will go haha, there are no patterns in random outcomes. This is true what you think you see is not really a pattern it's just a coincidence but you can still use this to your advantage. I'm talking about events that happen in the extreme short term, they only last for a spin or two or three and then they're gone. Certain things have to be happening in conjunction with other things that are happening that triggers a bet for me. I'm sorry if this sounds confusing but that's the way it is.

My challenge is till open, spikey. I'll pony up real, double zero roulettes result and you play against them and show us all yer roulettes prowess. I know you claim a 88% strikes rate but for purpose of my challenge I'll only require you capture a mere 58% strikes rate. If you can manage that then I'll declare you to be the best roulettes cat of all times and I'll put a cool risk free, taxes free 1k in yer pockets, hey hey!!!!

Wow a thousand whole American dollars? Golly gee willikers, has anybody ever seen that much money? And I know you're always 100% on my side but even with that, I think I'll pass..

[Spike]

You should hire Rob.Singer for lessons. You're not good at this...RIP

I have no idea what Rob Singer does but I doubt he would teach me anything that I don't already know.

[PositiveVariance]

So ultimately, he claims he has a method that can identify numbers or pockets of numbers, that hit at a higher rate than should randomly occur.

I often look for patterns within patterns, a big pattern is going on while a smaller pattern is happening inside of it.

Just when I think I have heard it all...
Now we have patterns within patterns lol
Small patterns happening inside of bigger patterns (double lol)

Maybe Belly, or one of the other Trolls that has a lot of free time can go over all of Spikes post on the various forums, and make a specific list of all the elements and claims that Spike says are part of his system/method/technique/research.

I bet we will find some very contradicting stuff!

[Spike]

Big patterns inside of smaller patterns (double lol)

I bet we will find some very contradicting stuff!

It's smaller patterns inside of bigger patterns, duh. It's only contradicting if you don't understand it so of course you'll think it's all contradictory because obviously you don't understand any of it. You don't want to, all you want to do is tear it down so you'll see what you want to see. Which will get you where you are now, nowhere. But you seem to like it there, you seem to wallow in it, being nowhere.

[kewlJ]

This is nothing new. Baccarat and roulette system players always believe in these kind of "patterns". It is the basis of who they are.

[PositiveVariance]

Spike, I am sure you keep very detailed records.

What is your ACTUAL (no practice sessions) long-term hit rate when playing for REAL money?

What kind of money has this discovery provided you with each month?

[Spike]

This is nothing new. Baccarat and roulette system players always believe in these kind of "patterns". It is the basis of who they are.

Gee why do you think that is. Because it works kind of, maybe?

[MDawg]

UNKewLyingJ hand cocked onto his side, the bent elbow and the high pitched whiny voice complaining, "Now wayyyyt a minute, Misterrrrr."

[Spike]

Spike, I am sure you keep very detailed records.

What is your ACTUAL (no practice sessions) long-term hit rate when playing for REAL money?

What kind of money has this discovery provided you with each month?

I have an 80% hit rate, I usually win on the first bet. I win every session because I have an 80% hit rate and I'm only trying to make one unit per session. I make enough to pay my bills, all my bills. But I don't have a mortgage or a car payment so use your imagination. Please don't ask me why I'm not a millionaire, I make as much money as I want to make. I'm too old to work myself to death over something like money. If I was in my thirties it would be a different story but I'm in my seventies and the drive just isn't there.

[PositiveVariance]

This is nothing new. Baccarat and roulette system players always believe in these kind of "patterns". It is the basis of who they are.

Gee why do you think that is. Because it works kind of, maybe?

Spike, I guess I thought you were above the 'pattern' bullshit.

[jbjb]

This is nothing new. Baccarat and roulette system players always believe in these kind of "patterns". It is the basis of who they are.

Gee why do you think that is. Because it works kind of, maybe?

Spike, I guess I thought you were above the 'pattern' bullshit.

He's a professional pattern bullshitter. Easy to see his "pattern".

[MisterV]

I have an 80% hit rate, I usually win on the first bet. I win every session because I have an 80% hit rate and I'm only trying to make one unit per session. I make enough to pay my bills, all my bills. But I don't have a mortgage or a car payment so use your imagination. Please don't ask me why I'm not a millionaire, I make as much money as I want to make. I'm too old to work myself to death over something like money. If I was in my thirties it would be a different story but I'm in my seventies and the drive just isn't there.

I hope your long-suffering wife and her divorce attorney get wind of this brag.

You just opened the door to a substantial obligation to pay alimony when your better half finally decides to flush your dumb ass down the crapper.

I can just envision it...you are being cross-examined by her attorney about the claim, and as a defense you say "It was just more bullshit...everybody knows that."

[jbjb]

I have an 80% hit rate, I usually win on the first bet. I win every session because I have an 80% hit rate and I'm only trying to make one unit per session. I make enough to pay my bills, all my bills. But I don't have a mortgage or a car payment so use your imagination. Please don't ask me why I'm not a millionaire, I make as much money as I want to make. I'm too old to work myself to death over something like money. If I was in my thirties it would be a different story but I'm in my seventies and the drive just isn't there.

I hope your long-suffering wife and her divorce attorney get wind of this brag.

You just opened the door to a substantial obligation to pay alimony when your better half finally decides to flush your dumb ass down the crapper.

Most likely he's not even married.

[Spike]

This is nothing new. Baccarat and roulette system players always believe in these kind of "patterns". It is the basis of who they are.

Gee why do you think that is. Because it works kind of, maybe?

Spike, I guess I thought you were above the 'pattern' bullshit.

It's hardly bullshit/ if you got something better I'd like to hear it. If you got something that wins more than I do.

[MisterV]

It's hardly bullshit/ if you got something better I'd like to hear it. If you got something that wins more than I do.

Just use the good old Hasbro "Pattern Detector."

Now on sale at a store near you.