backoffs, baring and play restrictions

[mickeycrimm]

Tough to tell just WHAT Robert's real motivation is; why does he concoct such elaborate cons?

The man isn't stupid so he probably (hopefully?) realizes that we're on to him: so it can't be respect he's after.

He might have sought it earlier but by now the jig is up.

So that leaves trolling...and the pleasure he gets from it by fucking with people.

Probably a similar dynamic behind the dawg as well.

That is what one would think but I'm not so sure.. he has been doing this sort of shit for many years now.. he wrote a whole book trying to gain attention and credibility.. it 100% was not a troll. People have weird motivations that just aren't right.. the nasty cat guy.. Kewl .. Robert.. Mdawg at least tries to be amusing I guess. I don't read his stuff much .. Redietz seems to want cred and backers.

Singer used to be more of an enigma but it really appears to be an effort to impress... It all seems retarded though, right? So who knows.

"Redietz seems to want cred and backers." Except for the fact that in 10,000 posts on this and other sites, going back literally decades, not once has redietz ever recruited backers. Not in posts. Not in PMs. Not once.

But account decides to opine with his usual loose thinking, making shit up as he types away.

Wanting "cred?" The only people on this site who halfway know anything about what I do are Boz, regnis, and Witteles. The migration of "APs" to this site has been a study in overblown weirdness. The culture of sports betting is larger than the culture of "APing" by at least a factor of 10 and maybe more like a hundred, yet the "APs" think they have relevant answers and expertise, like freshmen taking grad courses.

Carry on.

I read your ad on your site looking for investors. You promised them what, 10% return on their investment? Why would a world class sports bettor need investors? And where did all the in investors go? Were you working with Steve Stevens?