Originally Posted by unowme View Post
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der View Post
Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
This, of course, lowers its value tremendously, due to low availability. But when you do find it under the right circumstances, it could be excellent.
Which is what I first suspect of each and every one of Crimm's plays, which amount only to some perceived edge. But, now we know for certain, that Crimm didn't include the obvious with that supposed 216% play, that such gets heavily watered down, if reasonably possible at all. Thanks for that much, Mr. UKnowMe. Specific solid evidence of a nutty, if not total fraud, Crimm. Yeah, sure, you can win by counting cards at baccarat if you wait through a 100 shoes, and, then, bet $50,000 on tie on a couple of hands at the end of the "golden shoe". To make, maybe, $10, a very tiny fraction of the commission on those winning bets.

And, in general, say, that Crimm is still spending his days, at seventy, on the road in the winter. I mean, why in the world, still only trying to make money, by then? Same as the Wizard squandering his remaining days on this Earth at that forum, for absolutely nothing but howls of laughter. And, yes, they found scribbled handwritten notes in Einstein's bed - he was still sweating it out, trying to prove that Relatively Theory was the Theory of Everything (TOE) - when he died, a form of dementia, by then, with evermore complex and complicated insoluble calculations.
What the hell is this guy's malfunction?

I asked Mickey and Dan to confirm that I had in fact found an advantaged play. They both did. Mickey's calculation about the advantage was actually identical to mine. Dan also said "It could be excellent". There are lots of advantage plays where certain conditions have to be met before it swings to positive EV. So really, dude. Why are you attacking Mickeycrimm? Is it something personal? Life's too short to hold a grudge.

My good friend who was with me when I discovered this play is a Professor of Mathematics. I own a small software company that focuses on advanced analytics and predictive modeling for business management. We are not professional gamblers, but we both know the math. That's why we were both shocked when we saw what was happening.

Instead of attacking a fellow board member who was actually very helpful, maybe you should focus your talents on coming up with a formula for pulling your head out of your ass.
Most people have learned to ignore him. I barely read his posts and usually only after someone else found it worth reading.