Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Shackleford was paid for that. That hardly makes him a reliable independent witness. Additionally, he is prohibited from speaking to what he saw or thinks by a DNA imposed on him, specifically so he can't. WTF? WHY??.
The fact that he was paid by DarkOz to witness the session doesn't disqualify him as a reliable independent witness.

Expert witnesses get paid, DarkOz enlisted Shack for the MD session. DO previously paid him to testify as an expert witness on his behalf in an action brought against him by a casino.

He must have considered him to be reliable, and hasn't questioned his reliability since.

Everyone but you seems to be satisfied that all information relevant to the actual challenge has been fully reported, and confirmed as complete and truthful by the witness.

Whatever else the NDA covers is irrelevant, all parties agreed not to disclose anything other than what's been reported.