Big Casino Wins and Jackpots

[accountinquestion]

I'll bite because I'm bored.

You ducked my questions, but that's OK because you still admitted what I tried to get you to admit.

Singer can take it from here.

Youre a master manipulator along with your sidekick Singer.

Now singer has amped up the projection calling me a liar ... about what? Expose me, Singer - or retreat back into that little rat nest office you carved out of a corner in your daughter's basement.

[MHF]

It's a good thing that a plow has two handles. Useless as shit of two different posters on both handles.

---> List of indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands.

https://anagram-solver.net/Its%20a%2....?partial=true


VCT is much worse than a snake pit. It pits one severe mental illness against another.

[DGenBen]

WTF!! I thought this was a forum of advantage players (even recreational) that understand the math.

Singer System:

1. Special plays. which by definition is LESS optimal (even more -EV) plays NEGATIVE

2. Progression wagering which can never overcome a house advantage. NEGATIVE

3. Stop limits. changes nothing. NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE + NEGATIVE + NEGATIVE Does NOT equal a positive.

And the "short term argument is an argument made by degenerate gambler type plays. Period. You know what short term wins playing negative expectation is called? It is called variance!

You might as well play your standard martingale, or pick your favorite number playing roulette. You might win short term with these just as well. But it does not make them a winning "system". And neither is Rob's nonsense.

And the argument slapinfunk makes about never seeing the long-term is the rational that losing players make. In blackjack AP's run simulations consisting of 10's even 100's of millions of rounds. But that doesn't mean you have to play 10's of millions of rounds. THAT advantage is in effect from round 1.

And it works the same way with VP. It works the same way with every game. You need something that flips that advantage to the player. And stacking negative voodoo concepts on top of one another isn't that something. This isn't opinion, this is mathematical fact.

Have we just gone total voodoo here in addition to total Troll?

Well sure, if you add two negative numbers the answer is still a negative number.

But as everyone knows when you multiply two negative numbers they become a positive.

So all you have to do is play a negative EV play a number of times that is negative EV multiply them together & Voila! - Positive Number!

You could also take a negative EV play and document every time you don’t play it. So if you don’t play a negative EV play 5 times, you have negative 5 plays.

You then multiply the negative EV number by the negative number of times you played, giving you a positive number, & then all you have to do is go ahead and collect that profit!

[Rob.Singer]

Actually Robert you know very little about him or his life.

But that won't stop you...no way,no how.

*golf clap*

And you know this how?

*hooker clap*

[Rob.Singer]

Actually Robert you know very little about him or his life.

But that won't stop you...no way,no how.

*golf clap*

And you know this how?

*hooker clap*

I thought you'd like that V. But here's the real reply:

What do I "know" about AQ? Now WHY on earth would I want to know ANYTHING about about someone who appears to be easily offended, who holds grudges, who wears his jealousy on his sleeve, and who's not very good at hurling insults....although I've heard he's just an old bum of a guy with zippo going on.

Please....hold the applause.

[accountinquestion]

With zippo going on? This a smoking reference?0

Whatever you say idiot. I'm a blunt force insulter with you and redietz because you're both cut of the same cloth. Redietz though could be cool when he's not being bitter. You're past being anything but bitter so enjoy that for the rest of your life.

The only time you haven't insulted is when you were trying to pat yourself on the back with your special plays nonsense.

It is gambling. Do whatever you wish. Just don't try and convince anyone it is sensical .

That's where kewl and I have to regulate.

Lol

[Cerveza Fria]

Actually Robert you know very little about him or his life.

But that won't stop you...no way,no how.

*golf clap*

And you know this how?

*hooker clap*

Well, I guess you know about one thing....getting the Clap from a Cheap Hooker.

[Rob.Singer]

You need to take a class Paco, because it just isn't working out.

[Tasha]

You need to take a class Paco, because it just isn't working out.

Who is Paco?

[Rob.Singer]

AQ, you're a failed forum influencer with nothing significant ever going on in your boring life. You try and try more than anyone. All you've got to show for it is arguments with kew and redietz. I attribute your misrepresentation about me to simple envy....which I REALLY like, if I haven't reiterated prior.

What's that!?---you're perplexed at the putdown?? Next time you claim to "never respond to a Singer post again" you might want to do what you say you're gonna do. I weaken you with every one of your replies. And there's no telling the amount of damage I succeeded in doing to such an old lonely useless fart with my successful manipulation skills.

Wise up....and reclaim what little dignity you had.

[jdog]

No, I don't know everything. But I know this: Short-term variance of -EV play is just that. It doesn't make for long-term winning.

Yes you're correct that you don't know everything. But seems to me you did not fully read my post or maybe just didn't understand it. That's ok try again. But you believing or understanding anything I post is fortunately not a requirement for me.

[SLaPiNFuNK]

Wow I can't believe how bent out of shape you all got from this alternate hold.

I ever tell you about the time I broke up 3 aces on DDB for 3 to the royal and actually hit the royal?

[Cerveza Fria]

Wow I can't believe how bent out of shape you all got from this alternate hold.

I ever tell you about the time I broke up 3 aces on DDB for 3 to the royal and actually hit the royal?

Ok, now you're just trolling. If you actually did that you should never play VP again.

[jdog]

I ever tell you about the time I broke up 3 aces on DDB for 3 to the royal and actually hit the royal?

There you go, now that's how stir to things up around here. You might have what it takes to be a VCT poster after all

[redietz]

Rob's nutcase level jumping, whatever its non-optimal nature and deficits, created a nutcase profile, which I'm sure has led to much better offers than somebody grinding optimally.

Are you sure that casinos base offers on their analysis of individual VP playing strategy, rather than individual coin-in and results?

I read something along those lines, but my recollection is that, while this type of analysis may be forthcoming, it is not currently utilized.

How long have they been using it?

I'm actually not referring to within-session nutcase-edness, which I assume can be X-rayed if someone really wants to, but session-to-session nutcase-edness. I don't think any slot manager thinks someone who bounces from playing 25-cents one session to $2 or $5 the next is utilizing sophisticated strateeeegerizing, as Rob alleges. Management just assumes either (A) they are chasing losses or (B) they hit something big somewhere, so they are firing away on that property in the here and now. These volatile profiles are becoming more and more common as a percent of the gambling population. Rob was just ahead of the curve by a decade or two.

[accountinquestion]

AQ, you're a failed forum influencer with nothing significant ever going on in your boring life. You try and try more than anyone. All you've got to show for it is arguments with kew and redietz. I attribute your misrepresentation about me to simple envy....which I REALLY like, if I haven't reiterated prior.

What's that!?---you're perplexed at the putdown?? Next time you claim to "never respond to a Singer post again" you might want to do what you say you're gonna do. I weaken you with every one of your replies. And there's no telling the amount of damage I succeeded in doing to such an old lonely useless fart with my successful manipulation skills.

Wise up....and reclaim what little dignity you had.

Show me where I said I'd never respond to you. Perhaps I said that but most likely a figment of your imagination.

At least your bullshit has been funny at times. Whether intentional or not is the question. We will never know but also won't ever see pictures of your made up assets. Just like kewl.

I print out my redietz and kewl arguments and they're all over my walls... but at least I have walls in which I can do this. Yanno?

Failed forum influencer is a decent one.

The most impressive thing about you is the absence of shame. Seriously

[accountinquestion]

Wow I can't believe how bent out of shape you all got from this alternate hold.

I ever tell you about the time I broke up 3 aces on DDB for 3 to the royal and actually hit the royal?

It has nothing to do with that but is about Rob flapping around talking about special plays. When the clown show turns on - it is on.

[accountinquestion]

Rob's nutcase level jumping, whatever its non-optimal nature and deficits, created a nutcase profile, which I'm sure has led to much better offers than somebody grinding optimally.

Are you sure that casinos base offers on their analysis of individual VP playing strategy, rather than individual coin-in and results?

I read something along those lines, but my recollection is that, while this type of analysis may be forthcoming, it is not currently utilized.

How long have they been using it?

I'm actually not referring to within-session nutcase-edness, which I assume can be X-rayed if someone really wants to, but session-to-session nutcase-edness. I don't think any slot manager thinks someone who bounces from playing 25-cents one session to $2 or $5 the next is utilizing sophisticated strateeeegerizing, as Rob alleges. Management just assumes either (A) they are chasing losses or (B) they hit something big somewhere, so they are firing away on that property in the here and now. These volatile profiles are becoming more and more common as a percent of the gambling population. Rob was just ahead of the curve by a decade or two.

Redietz, they use computers.

Management isn't looking through VP histories to determine comps.

[kewlJ]

We will never know but also won't ever see pictures of your made up assets. Just like kewl.

First, we HAVE seen pictures of Rob's made up assets. Are you forgetting the Newell (that didn't belong to him), the stacks of prop money cash? Somewhere on this forum there is even a video of Rob giving a tour of his daughter's house, claiming it was his, when public records prove otherwise.

You say I don't do this. Damn right I don't! For the life of me, why would any real player, real person with real assets, even modest such as myself, post pictures to prove anything to some idiots on an anonymous forum? Are people really THIS insecure?

I am immediately suspicious of anyone who posts such pictures. And that includes the person that posts as Mdawg. I know a top AP in this town, (doesn't post here much anymore) that swears Mdawg only has access to those assets that he posts pictures of. (meaning friend, family, boss). I don't know if that is true or not, but who needs to impress people on the internet to this extent? Seriously?

It has nothing to do with that but is about Rob flapping around talking about special plays. When the clown show turns on - it is on.

AccountinQ, YOU and others accuse me of this very mentality that you just expressed, frequently asking why I keep up going after someone like Singer or Mdawg long after it was necessary. And the answer, as you just figured out, is these people don't stop. This isn't my first go around with these type of people making these type of all but impossible math defying claims. They just never stop, even after being thoroughly exposed. They just keep going, oblivious to the fact that they were totally debunked, by say pictures of a Newell at the dealership for example.

And the same with this Singer system. First, he claimed he played it for a decade making millions. Then he cut it down to 4 years to make room (on the timeline) for the double up bug claim that he stole. the fact is he did not play this system and make any kind of serious money. It is NOT a winning system. But he will keep coming back with the claim, so you have to keep reminding him that it isn't real. he just never lets up. That is the way with all these guys.

Look at Dawg. 7 months he posted daily reports of almost nothing but wins. Totaling millions. Then after being caught, he made a one line statement that "he was about even". You would have thought that would have been the end. But no. 2 days later he was back starting all over with the win-every-day claims. These guys just never quit.

[accountinquestion]

We will never know but also won't ever see pictures of your made up assets. Just like kewl.

First, we HAVE seen pictures of Rob's made up assets. Are you forgetting the Newell (that didn't belong to him), the stacks of prop money cash? Somewhere on this forum there is even a video of Rob giving a tour of his daughter's house, claiming it was his, when public records prove otherwise.

You say I don't do this. Damn right I don't! For the life of me, why would any real player, real person with real assets, even modest such as myself, post pictures to prove anything to some idiots on an anonymous forum? Are people really THIS insecure?

I am immediately suspicious of anyone who posts such pictures. And that includes the person that posts as Mdawg. I know a top AP in this town, (doesn't post here much anymore) that swears Mdawg only has access to those assets that he posts pictures of. (meaning friend, family, boss). I don't know if that is true or not, but who needs to impress people on the internet to this extent? Seriously?

It has nothing to do with that but is about Rob flapping around talking about special plays. When the clown show turns on - it is on.

AccountinQ, YOU and others accuse me of this very mentality that you just expressed, frequently asking why I keep up going after someone like Singer or Mdawg long after it was necessary. And the answer, as you just figured out, is these people don't stop. This isn't my first go around with these type of people making these type of all but impossible math defying claims. They just never stop, even after being thoroughly exposed. They just keep going, oblivious to the fact that they were totally debunked, by say pictures of a Newell at the dealership for example.

And the same with this Singer system. First, he claimed he played it for a decade making millions. Then he cut it down to 4 years to make room (on the timeline) for the double up bug claim that he stole. the fact is he did not play this system and make any kind of serious money. It is NOT a winning system. But he will keep coming back with the claim, so you have to keep reminding him that it isn't real. he just never lets up. That is the way with all these guys.

Look at Dawg. 7 months he posted daily reports of almost nothing but wins. Totaling millions. Then after being caught, he made a one line statement that "he was about even". You would have thought that would have been the end. But no. 2 days later he was back starting all over with the win-every-day claims. These guys just never quit.

Bro you can't even cough up a picture of a surfboard but you can talk about why you wont for 2 hours. It is silly. Get help.