Originally Posted by jdog View Post
Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
The Nobel prize for ivermectin had to do with it being an anti-parasitic. Not anti-viral.
I think that's true but obviously winning an award of that magnitude means it was a game changer. MSM talked about it like it was almost completely insignificant outside of veterinary use but these studies say otherwise.

The point I'm making is over and over you see the most prominent info always seems to benefit pharma. If you can't see that then I don't know what else to say.
Msm talked it plenty. They just never framed it as a wonder drug and were cynical. While your study is impressive I believe there are others later on that show that while it may very well do something - the effect is very minor and questionable as to whether it even exists. My opinion on it on it has very little to do with msm.