Originally Posted by redietz View Post
I have just one problem with kewlJ's stories, but that one problem pretty much means I can't trust anything he writes.

It's that jive about "misdirection." The problem is that anything presented can be assigned the label "misdirection" at a later date, making the source (in this case, kewlJ) wholly unreliable. It's a constant, often-used, get-out-of-lying card. Maybe if somebody used this "misdirection" excuse once in his life, I could forgive it, but I'm an old journalist/reporter. When kewlJ continually trots out "misdirection" as a euphemism for "I lied," I just cannot put any stock in anything he says.

I'm sure, if I wanted to construct some fanciful details about working for Billy Walters or living 100 days a year in LV for 20-some years, I could fire away and then backtrack in the unlikely event somebody discovered contradictions, by reporting that it was in my best interest to "misdirect." The whole concept of covering lying with the word "misdirection" is ridiculous. The writer loses all credibility.

I mean, the whole debate is ludicrous. MrV, go ahead and ream the Dog, but ream the dude who "misdirects," too. I think "misdirecting" in a court of law is a felony. Why should anyone bother to read posts by somebody who "misdirects" when it suits him? What is the fucking point?
Originally Posted by redietz View Post
You have fake deaths, marriages and deaths, evil doxxers, backroom arm-breakers, and after-the-fact-"misdirection" that would have been unnecessary if you simply don't make public the narrative.