How about this? Let us say I'm willing to give Dan access to a handful of my sports/casino accounts and he can do a dive into "If I know what I'm doing". He can see how much im up, what I have invested etc etc. You can say a few lucky big bets are meaningless, and I would agree.
Dan can assess that there are a significant number of wagers(It might be a shit ton of work, there is probably a way to import it directly to a spreadsheet) and accounts that go well above the standard deviation of it being simple luck even if I were to cherry-pick as the number of wagers and places would be overwhelming enough to realize it's not just running good. Other than gracing me with your decades-old "I worked for Billy Walters" stories... what do you have to offer?
"involving not much money" I can guarantee you that I have wagered much more of my money than you have with your own money at +EV lifetime in less time than you have.
If that won't work for you, how about a contest of some sort? Just spitballing here: You must use your own money, no investor's money, no team bankroll money, and no borrowed money. We both start with the same amount of bankroll. We play at an agreed-upon offshore joint. You can't re-up/add more bankroll money, transfer money from other people or accounts, or play poker/live casino games. Our bet sizes will be limited to an agreed-on amount. You can bet as much or as little as you want(not to exceed the betting limit) on whatever you want, and you use whatever bonuses you want. The goal is to make money so whoever makes more money at the end of x number of days wins. We can agree on how much we are each willing to put up to make it worthwhile. We can set aside somthing for the verifier to check accounts and make sure no rules were broken.





Reply With Quote