Belly is just trolling, playing games and wasting everyone's time....AGAIN. Why is no one surprised.Originally Posted by coach belly
To keep confidential all information not relevant to the challenge.Originally Posted by MisterV
What other information should be disclosed?
While the challenge was very specific, in that it was whether Dawg could have a winning session for 45 minutes or more. That served absolutely no purpose. Hell 40-45% of any gamblers playing any old stupid system will have a winning session for an hour. Proves nothing.
And while Wizard said there was no martingale played, martingale is only one form of a progression system that could have been played that would give a player better than a 50% chance to have a winning session. For example, instead of doubling up after a losing wager as true martingale goes, if that first shoe had resulted in him being down, he could have played a second shoe at higher wagers and then a third at even higher. This would be a progression system, progressing after each shoe rather than each bet, so it wouldn't be a martingale. Additionally that are negative progression systems ect that aren't martingale, but are still progression systems.
He could have even just flat bet and if behind towards the end, thrown out a very large bet to overcome all those losses if he won. AND it wasn't even a wager IIRC, it was a free roll for Dawg. He had nothing to lose, right.
BUT the bigger part of the whole thing was Dawg was claiming he was doing something that could result in long-term winning. THAT was really what this challenge or free roll was supposed to determine. AND that is where Wizard was supposed to come in. This is where his expertise was suppose to take place. And he was unable to do that when he agreed not to say what he saw. And if he had, done what he was supposed to do, we wouldn't have had to endure 5 years of dawgs goofy claims.
If Mike had said, "yeah Dawg showed a winning session, making him the winner of the challenge, but I saw nothing he was doing that would account for long-term winnings", it would have been over that day. THAT is what he was suppose to tell us. Either that or "yeah, Dawg is doing something that would account for all the long-term winning he has claimed". Wizard failed to do his job!!
Now Mike tried to make up for it what...2 years later when he did violate the agreement and basically said, Dawg was not doing something that would account for the winnings". I can't quote or link to it because Mike removed it and suspended himself for violating the agreement after Dawg threatened him.
And anyone that saw what Mike said that day, saw that he tried to say in code what he wanted to say. Paraphrasing it went something like this: "People have asked me what Mdawg does to win. let me just say again, that no betting system can overcome the house edge".
Belly can play his games but what Wizard was saying is he witnessed dawg play some sort of betting system that allowed him to win that session, and that free roll of a challenge, but in no way would account for any of the long-term winning Dawg has claimed.
If Dawg were doing something that would account for all the winning he has claimed for more than 5 years now, he would want Wizard to say that, not prohibit him from saying so. And Mike could have said that without giving away what it was. But that is not what occurred and that should tell anyone who still cares all they need to know.
But if Dawg wants to rectify the situation, he can STILL at any time allow Mike to say what he saw. NOT giving away any secret, just whether Dawg is doing something that would account for all the fantasy winning he claimed. Dawg could do that any day. But Don't hold your breath.
Reply With Quote