Flames in a must win situation.
Flames Puck Line
Devils Puck Line
Penguins Puck Line
MLB
Tigers Money Line or Run Line
Giants Money Line
Angels Money Line
Rays Money Line or Run Line
Mets Run Line
Reds Run Line
White Sox Money Line because over 2 to 1 on your money.
Have you ever thought about what a "must win situations" really is? (not just in this instance but all "must win situations")Originally Posted by monet
A team hasn't played well to find themselves in this must win, desperate type situation, and now all of the sudden they are going to turn it up 3 notches and play great? Well they might do so, but will do so without my money on them.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
100%, this is Day 1 ploppy type stuff. Right up there with the parlays.Originally Posted by kewlJHave you ever thought about what a "must win situations" really is? (not just in this instance but all "must win situations")Originally Posted by monet
A team hasn't played well to find themselves in this must win, desperate type situation, and now all of the sudden they are going to turn it up 3 notches and play great? Well they might do so, but will do so without my money on them.
And should tell you any “success” he has had is pure Luck. I’m actually surprised you thought following him was any better than flipping a coin on the games straight themselves, taking away his Puck Line and Run Line nonsense. Which I will admit at times can be a better “value” compared to the money line, but you are paying for that value with expectancy. And you are certainly going to lose on games you should have won, especially with OT in hockey where 20-25% of games go a season.
But fat boy counts on empty net goals that occurred last season less than 14 times per team. Degenerate, desperate nonsense right there.
Look I don’t like the guy for multiple reasons and still feel he is a true piece of shit for talking about being able to rob Axel years ago. But he comes off as an idiot here with his sports betting nonsense. And you know books love people like him which makes me question anything he claims.
Flames WINOriginally Posted by monet
Devils LOSS
Pens LOSS
Tigers LOSS
Giants WIN
Angels LOSS
Rays WIN
Mets WIN
Reds WIN
White Sox LOSS against one of the best pitchers in baseball, but hey, he got 2 to 1
Overall 5-5 and another LOSING day for the fat fuck, even before the parlays we know he bets trying like Tasha to change his life. We are truly fortunate to have 2 of the biggest losers in life here for our enjoyment.
Other than the obvious that he’s a degenerate betting 10 games, it’s a case study in why books are making record profits.
Better luck Monday fat fuck!
Appears fat boy took his bag of hamburgers and went home.
Note last night all 4 NHL home teams (favorites) won by exactly 1 goal. So those betting the odds WON while the losers buying lottery tickets on the Fuck Line LOST again.
I don’t advocate betting all the favorites, but if you do, you lay the odds with the proper bankroll, and not count on nonsense like Empty Net goals or fear OT. And of course you don’t parlay them.
Day 1 shit, day 1 stuff.
NHL last night
Favorites 2-2 including Vegas losing at -221 and Tampa at -117
Fuck line 1-3 with only Carolina winning by 2 with an empty net late.
As always, all parlays LOST
Oh where oh where is our favorite high cholesterol, Asian massage paying, home favorite NHL tout?
Originally Posted by The Boz
LOL. I blame it on people pushing parlay calc-oooo-laters.
On a serious note, yeah, it's Day One stuff, but Day One stuff circa 1975. I'm not sure if it's the fluoride, the addiction to the internet, too much alcohol, not enough alcohol, too much video porn, too little Penthouse magazine or what, but the average gambling IQ of the civilian gambler has dropped about a point a year in my lifetime. And their evaluation of their own gambling IQ has risen a point a year at the same time.
Bad combination.
I'm not the only one that understands how to beat parlays.Originally Posted by redietzOriginally Posted by The Boz
LOL. I blame it on people pushing parlay calc-oooo-laters.
On a serious note, yeah, it's Day One stuff, but Day One stuff circa 1975. I'm not sure if it's the fluoride, the addiction to the internet, too much alcohol, not enough alcohol, too much video porn, too little Penthouse magazine or what, but the average gambling IQ of the civilian gambler has dropped about a point a year in my lifetime. And their evaluation of their own gambling IQ has risen a point a year at the same time.
Bad combination.
The only problem is this guy did it wrong.
But it does show that Kiosk Betting could be a problem in the wrong shop.
I recently cashed over 40 tickets when betting the first 5 games of the NHL Playoffs.
3 teamers and 2 teamers all under 2k in payouts.
No problems.
I think Vegas is easier to do this.
But it is clear that they know about circumventing the window.
Not that I didn't realize this.
Where did you go?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote