Originally Posted by DGenBen View Post
Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
When I inquired thru DM as to why you hadn't appeared on GWAE or Life's a Gamble, Mr. Munchkin's reply was...
Your quote is hearsay...you are quoting Munchkin, who is quoting Redietz.

Munchkin is not available to this forum for examination... Redietz is available and provides direct testimony.

This dynamic could change, Munchkin could visit this forum and allow his recollection to be challenged and respond accordingly, or Red could stipulate that the quote conveys something that is essentially accurate.

But he didn't, he disputed it.
Is this an anonymous online gambling forum or a court of law?
THANK YOU!!!

This is an anonymous gambling forum, where most people are anonymous. That is why we use handles instead of real names.

People share gambling experiences, including some players that play for a living. Anyone can choose to believe them or not. No one is required to prove anything. AND you shouldn't need proof, to figure out who knows what they are talking about and who is just taking and making up and/or exaggerating claims. MATH is a big part of that "figuring out". The math HAS to work.

But these things always evolve into complete bullshit, demanding proof of this or that and what would stand up in a court of law. Again, this is an anonymous gambling forum, not a court of law.

And if members are required to prove everything they say, then you will have no AP and people that play for a living posting here. It will be a forum of nothing but Rob Singers, coach bellys, Mdawgs and the likes, with their strange claims that defy math and reality.