I didn't follow all of the posts, but I never thought that redietz and mdawg were the same person or were sharing posts and writing and all that. But, the more the posts get examined, well….
I find it hard to believe the lack of substance/details and reliance on statements without evidence are a simple coincidence. I guess when redietz began making statements that were dead wrong that I finally heard echoes of mdawg. Mdawg does that stuff all the time. But redietz? I just didn't see it at all until redietz started the dead wrong statements
The weird resonance between the redietz and mdawg handles is at the far end of credibility. Why would a supposed professional gambler say things he has completely wrong? I have no answer.
Now redietz does this kind of thing all the time. You debunk him six ways and he comes back with a response to your weakest of the six. He ignores the other five and hopes everyone else does. Mdawg when confronted with the fact he had completely wrong information doesn't apologize for declaring things that he got utterly wrong. They both just go on to the next thing while ignoring what they got wrong.
Reply With Quote