Bob Dietz' Coming Appeararance On PokerFraudAlert Radio

[redietz]

One important thing I learned from Fletcher was the idea that there were certain anomaly games that you just had to throw out. I was a stickler, too much a stickler, for incorporating all the stats of all the games. What Fletcher more or less helped me realize was that certain games, usually one per season per team (more or less), would just be anomalies, games that you were better served ignoring for the most part.

This seems lol to me but maybe I am the one who doesn't understand the full context.

The fascinat8ng thing about redietz is he never talks specifics ever except when name dropping names that people have by and large never heard of.

Yeah, how about that? Another Mensa-level observation from account.

I thought the "AP" logic was that if someone was winning, they would keep how they were winning (for the most part) to themselves? No? My error.

I wish these "APs" would make up their minds about proper protocol. I'm easily confused.

[accountinquestion]

One important thing I learned from Fletcher was the idea that there were certain anomaly games that you just had to throw out. I was a stickler, too much a stickler, for incorporating all the stats of all the games. What Fletcher more or less helped me realize was that certain games, usually one per season per team (more or less), would just be anomalies, games that you were better served ignoring for the most part.

This seems lol to me but maybe I am the one who doesn't understand the full context.

The fascinat8ng thing about redietz is he never talks specifics ever except when name dropping names that people have by and large never heard of.

Yeah, how about that? Another Mensa-level observation from account.

I thought the "AP" logic was that if someone was winning, they would keep how they were winning (for the most part) to themselves? No? My error.

I wish these "APs" would make up their minds about proper protocol. I'm easily confused.

Most casino AP stuff is readily attacked if someone else points out the flaw and the opportunity. Especially if it is a problem at one casino or a handful.

Talking about your view on specific stats etc is not going to be that exploited and there are many interesting conversations to be had around it .

You just like to speak in these vague suggestive terms that suggests you know more than everyone else which that is so completely not the case most of the time.

You do seem to know a lot about football and have given it a lot of thought. That doesn't mean you're right about much else but you do have your areas where I believe you are an expert. I do not think you know that much about sports betting like you claim. Your ignorance on some things suggests significant holes in your understanding.

Whatever, I don't expect you to understand the differences here. It is far better to just sit back behind your smoke screen ways. Sure you're a winner, therefore you can't say anything specific outside of the bullshit name dropping.

Because thats what winners do................................................ ............. right?

[AxelWolf]

One important thing I learned from Fletcher was the idea that there were certain anomaly games that you just had to throw out. I was a stickler, too much a stickler, for incorporating all the stats of all the games. What Fletcher more or less helped me realize was that certain games, usually one per season per team (more or less), would just be anomalies, games that you were better served ignoring for the most part.

This seems lol to me but maybe I am the one who doesn't understand the full context.

The fascinat8ng thing about redietz is he never talks specifics ever except when name dropping names that people have by and large never heard of.

Yeah, how about that? Another Mensa-level observation from account.

I thought the "AP" logic was that if someone was winning, they would keep how they were winning (for the most part) to themselves? No? My error.

I wish these "APs" would make up their minds about proper protocol. I'm easily confused.

There is a huge difference between keeping a specific play worth 4 figures an hour at a specific casino to themselves, versus talking about the where, when, and how to beat something like Full Pay Deuces wild.

If you had a specific online casino that had fucked up +EV numbers then you should keep that shit to yourself.

If you find a place giving out 5k loss rebates, you should keep that to yourself.

If you want to talk about half juice Fridays or whatever, it's not a big deal.

If you're sitting at a poker table with two rich idiots straddling all in from all positions, you probably shouldn't tweet your location.

If a particular casino has good poker games on Friday nights, tweet about it all you want.

If you're using Unibated or some other service to pick up $100 a day on arbs and whatnot, it's not a big deal.

If you figured out something unknown to most other Advantage Players that creates a significant +EV opportunity, you should keep that in your circle.

If you want to teach someone all the good tricks and skills needed on how to find and mine for gold, go for it, just don't tell them where your rich lode is.

A good Advantage Player/pro sports bettor should know what he should and shouldn't divulge. I highly doubt you're doing anything related to handicapping that isn't well known.

[accountinquestion]

A good Advantage Player/pro sports bettor should know what he should and shouldn't divulge. I highly doubt you're doing anything related to handicapping that isn't well known.

I suspect if you asked Billy Waters he would have something to say about this.

[redietz]

One important thing I learned from Fletcher was the idea that there were certain anomaly games that you just had to throw out. I was a stickler, too much a stickler, for incorporating all the stats of all the games. What Fletcher more or less helped me realize was that certain games, usually one per season per team (more or less), would just be anomalies, games that you were better served ignoring for the most part.

This seems lol to me but maybe I am the one who doesn't understand the full context.

The fascinat8ng thing about redietz is he never talks specifics ever except when name dropping names that people have by and large never heard of.

Yeah, how about that? Another Mensa-level observation from account.

I thought the "AP" logic was that if someone was winning, they would keep how they were winning (for the most part) to themselves? No? My error.

I wish these "APs" would make up their minds about proper protocol. I'm easily confused.

There is a huge difference between keeping a specific play worth 4 figures an hour at a specific casino to themselves, versus talking about the where, when, and how to beat something like Full Pay Deuces wild.

If you had a specific online casino that had fucked up +EV numbers then you should keep that shit to yourself.

If you find a place giving out 5k loss rebates, you should keep that to yourself.

If you want to talk about half juice Fridays or whatever, it's not a big deal.

If you're sitting at a poker table with two rich idiots straddling all in from all positions, you probably shouldn't tweet your location.

If a particular casino has good poker games on Friday nights, tweet about it all you want.

If you're using Unibated or some other service to pick up $100 a day on arbs and whatnot, it's not a big deal.

If you figured out something unknown to most other Advantage Players that creates a significant +EV opportunity, you should keep that in your circle.

If you want to teach someone all the good tricks and skills needed on how to find and mine for gold, go for it, just don't tell them where your rich lode is.

A good Advantage Player/pro sports bettor should know what he should and shouldn't divulge. I highly doubt you're doing anything related to handicapping that isn't well known.

Well, Axelwolf, let me give an example of a quick flaw in your logic. I don't have an eidetic memory, but I used to have something close (if the strange words bother you, ask Shackleford) when it came to football. I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do. I was essentially adding hours, if not days, to applying the stats in my head as opposed to having to spend time learning them.

The bottom line -- while I wasn't doing anything different from other people in this instance, I was doing it much, much faster.

And I agree that I probably am not doing anything that's not well known -- LOL. I'm just doing more of it better.

Another example -- everything in a football season is time-related. You have hours to process info before lines come out Sunday night, then you have to act. Speed is everything because you need to get the best of numbers, especially in college football where you may have a third of the schedule moving two points or more any given week. And you have to be able to anticipate regarding where lines are likely to move, which is something I happen to be very, very good at.

Now if you hadn't considered the need for speed, then you really have no idea what you're dealing with on a weekly basis.

Again, Axelwolf with some insults. Axelwolf, which handicappers have you dialed up to discuss me? Because if you haven't done journalistic due diligence, why type an opinion with no information? I mean, it's just stupid. You think your opinion means something. It means nothing. You're an anonymous "AP" who thinks he's the master of all things. It's basically ridiculous. When it comes to sports betting, Boz probably knows ten times what you know, and has better judgement.

[AxelWolf]

Yeah, how about that? Another Mensa-level observation from account.

I thought the "AP" logic was that if someone was winning, they would keep how they were winning (for the most part) to themselves? No? My error.

I wish these "APs" would make up their minds about proper protocol. I'm easily confused.

There is a huge difference between keeping a specific play worth 4 figures an hour at a specific casino to themselves, versus talking about the where, when, and how to beat something like Full Pay Deuces wild.

If you had a specific online casino that had fucked up +EV numbers then you should keep that shit to yourself.

If you find a place giving out 5k loss rebates, you should keep that to yourself.

If you want to talk about half juice Fridays or whatever, it's not a big deal.

If you're sitting at a poker table with two rich idiots straddling all in from all positions, you probably shouldn't tweet your location.

If a particular casino has good poker games on Friday nights, tweet about it all you want.

If you're using Unibated or some other service to pick up $100 a day on arbs and whatnot, it's not a big deal.

If you figured out something unknown to most other Advantage Players that creates a significant +EV opportunity, you should keep that in your circle.

If you want to teach someone all the good tricks and skills needed on how to find and mine for gold, go for it, just don't tell them where your rich lode is.

A good Advantage Player/pro sports bettor should know what he should and shouldn't divulge. I highly doubt you're doing anything related to handicapping that isn't well known.

Well, Axelwolf, let me give an example of a quick flaw in your logic. I don't have an eidetic memory, but I used to have something close (if the strange words bother you, ask Shackleford) when it came to football. I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do. I was essentially adding hours, if not days, to applying the stats in my head as opposed to having to spend time learning them.

The bottom line -- while I wasn't doing anything different from other people in this instance, I was doing it much, much faster.

And I agree that I probably am not doing anything that's not well known -- LOL. I'm just doing more of it better.

Another example -- everything in a football season is time-related. You have hours to process info before lines come out Sunday night, then you have to act. Speed is everything because you need to get the best of numbers, especially in college football where you may have a third of the schedule moving two points or more any given week. And you have to be able to anticipate regarding where lines are likely to move, which is something I happen to be very, very good at.

Now if you hadn't considered the need for speed, then you really have no idea what you're dealing with on a weekly basis.

Again, Axelwolf with some insults. Axelwolf, which handicappers have you dialed up to discuss me? Because if you haven't done journalistic due diligence, why type an opinion with no information? I mean, it's just stupid. You think your opinion means something. It means nothing. You're an anonymous "AP" who thinks he's the master of all things. It's basically ridiculous. When it comes to sports betting, Boz probably knows ten times what you know, and has better judgement.

I've never claimed to be a master of all things; you're making shit up. Please show one post where I have indicated that? I can show posts right indicated the opposite. I would say I'm well versed in many areas of Advantage Play, and I've done many things that others haven't until after I had. I would say I'm pretty good at thinking outside the box and figuring out the best angles and angle shooting to make money from the casinos.

I'm sure many on this forum know much more about sports than I do. I'm sure there are new guys that come along that know more about sports than all of us do, including myself. I don't claim to be a Sports Guru, but I certainly know enough to spot bullshit when I see it. And I certainly know who knows what the fuck they're talking about.

Anytime I've ever mentioned your name to anyone nobody knows who the fuck you are unless they've been around on the forums. And again, I'm not a journalist, reporter, investigator or a professional fucking interviewer.

In a post, I asked you about me talking to Anthony Curtis regarding you, and you ignored it.

You can call me Anonymous all you want, but hundreds of people and the Gaming and Advantage Play Community know who I am and my real name.
And that's not just including other Unknown People. I have played with, partnered with, competed with, hung out with, been to parties with, worked with, done business with, and shared information with many well-known people in the gaming Advantage play community.

[kewlJ]

I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do.

Interesting. Red has become the second player here on our little sparsely populated forum that is claiming the same "super-power" of photographic memory to attempt to explain, what otherwise seems unexplainable.

[MDawg]

UNKewlJ's stupidity explained: mental illness.

[redietz]

There is a huge difference between keeping a specific play worth 4 figures an hour at a specific casino to themselves, versus talking about the where, when, and how to beat something like Full Pay Deuces wild.

If you had a specific online casino that had fucked up +EV numbers then you should keep that shit to yourself.

If you find a place giving out 5k loss rebates, you should keep that to yourself.

If you want to talk about half juice Fridays or whatever, it's not a big deal.

If you're sitting at a poker table with two rich idiots straddling all in from all positions, you probably shouldn't tweet your location.

If a particular casino has good poker games on Friday nights, tweet about it all you want.

If you're using Unibated or some other service to pick up $100 a day on arbs and whatnot, it's not a big deal.

If you figured out something unknown to most other Advantage Players that creates a significant +EV opportunity, you should keep that in your circle.

If you want to teach someone all the good tricks and skills needed on how to find and mine for gold, go for it, just don't tell them where your rich lode is.

A good Advantage Player/pro sports bettor should know what he should and shouldn't divulge. I highly doubt you're doing anything related to handicapping that isn't well known.

Well, Axelwolf, let me give an example of a quick flaw in your logic. I don't have an eidetic memory, but I used to have something close (if the strange words bother you, ask Shackleford) when it came to football. I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do. I was essentially adding hours, if not days, to applying the stats in my head as opposed to having to spend time learning them.

The bottom line -- while I wasn't doing anything different from other people in this instance, I was doing it much, much faster.

And I agree that I probably am not doing anything that's not well known -- LOL. I'm just doing more of it better.

Another example -- everything in a football season is time-related. You have hours to process info before lines come out Sunday night, then you have to act. Speed is everything because you need to get the best of numbers, especially in college football where you may have a third of the schedule moving two points or more any given week. And you have to be able to anticipate regarding where lines are likely to move, which is something I happen to be very, very good at.

Now if you hadn't considered the need for speed, then you really have no idea what you're dealing with on a weekly basis.

Again, Axelwolf with some insults. Axelwolf, which handicappers have you dialed up to discuss me? Because if you haven't done journalistic due diligence, why type an opinion with no information? I mean, it's just stupid. You think your opinion means something. It means nothing. You're an anonymous "AP" who thinks he's the master of all things. It's basically ridiculous. When it comes to sports betting, Boz probably knows ten times what you know, and has better judgement.

I've never claimed to be a master of all things; you're making shit up. Please show one post where I have indicated that? I can show posts right indicated the opposite. I would say I'm well versed in many areas of Advantage Play, and I've done many things that others haven't until after I had. I would say I'm pretty good at thinking outside the box and figuring out the best angles and angle shooting to make money from the casinos.

I'm sure many on this forum know much more about sports than I do. I'm sure there are new guys that come along that know more about sports than all of us do, including myself. I don't claim to be a Sports Guru, but I certainly know enough to spot bullshit when I see it. And I certainly know who knows what the fuck they're talking about.

Anytime I've ever mentioned your name to anyone nobody knows who the fuck you are unless they've been around on the forums. And again, I'm not a journalist, reporter, investigator or a professional fucking interviewer.

In a post, I asked you about me talking to Anthony Curtis regarding you, and you ignored it.

You can call me Anonymous all you want, but hundreds of people and the Gaming and Advantage Play Community know who I am and my real name.
And that's not just including other Unknown People. I have played with, partnered with, competed with, hung out with, been to parties with, worked with, done business with, and shared information with many well-known people in the gaming Advantage play community.

If you are neither a "journalist, reporter, investigator, or professional fucking interviewer," why would you want to interview me? What qualifies you? It's stupid. Step aside.

And why in God's name would I want to be interviewed by you? I mean, this is comical. Just step aside. Or don't. I'm going to call James Dennison tomorrow and see if he wants to film the interview live for entertainment value. It'll be good feedback for me and, if he can do it, I'm sure it'll be a fine test of my ability to think on my feet and be disciplined.

I have no idea about you "talking to Anthony Curtis" or Mr. Flowers or anyone. But it's not as if "Anthony Curtis" was quick to get into the whole sports betting gestalt or really had much (if any) interaction with sports bettors the first five to 10 years of the LVA. In fact, I was always surprised that the Advisor dragged its feet as long as it did, and then assembled a roster of people who were more advantage players than sports experts. I guess he assembled who he could, but I thought it was really tardy and he missed an opportunity.

Send along your email to integritysports@aol.com. Thanks.

[redietz]

I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do.

Interesting. Red has become the second player here on our little sparsely populated forum that is claiming the same "super-power" of photographic memory to attempt to explain, what otherwise seems unexplainable.

For God's sake, I went out of my way to say I DID NOT have an eidetic memory. But the kewlJ(s) bullshit as usual.

For Lent 2026, you should try telling the truth for 40 days.

[kewlJ]

I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do.

Interesting. Red has become the second player here on our little sparsely populated forum that is claiming the same "super-power" of photographic memory to attempt to explain, what otherwise seems unexplainable.

For God's sake, I went out of my way to say I DID NOT have an eidetic memory. But the kewlJ(s) bullshit as usual.

For Lent 2026, you should try telling the truth for 40 days.

What do you call it when you claim you can look at a page of stats and have total recall?

You are a fucktard Red, you really are. EVERYTHING about you is how you are better, smarter, than everyone else. You are not. You are/were a fucking sports "tout". A scam-dicapper. Not illegal, but certainly nothing to be proud of. And the only reason you survived all this time is because you had a spouse who was a professional who basically supported you.

And the telling part: In 2025, you continue to talk about and push results from some contest in 1980's, 1990's. 40 YEARS AGO! These 40 year old results, long forgotten by everyone else are your blood line, because it allowed you to scam new potentials clients.

What is wrong with this guy? It is 2025 Red!

[kewlJ]

Somebody asked me yesterday exactly when it was that Bob Deitz changed from a normal guy on these forums to a nut. I don't think it is a secret who, but since he asked in private am not going to say. He can if he wants.

My answer narrowed it down to two specific points in time. One was when APs, first Axelwolf and then myself started doing something at an advantage involving sports betting. How dare we.

The second and this one may have actually occurred first, was when mickeycrimm started collecting SS. You remember, Dietz made that comment about "mickey sucking on the teet of the government" like social security is some kind of welfare handout. I am not sure why that was a trigger, but that seems to be when Redietz really upped his anti-AP rhetoric. When he really became one of these anti-APers.

That is the two points in the timeline when Dietz went from a normal dude, to this anti-AP, no one can do what I did for 40 years, which now turns out to be a scam-dicapper tout.

[kewlJ]

Anyway, I was out late last night/this morning playing blackjack. Been betting and watching sports all day, (how dare I?) Gotta take a nap, before I possibly head out again this evening.
Happy Trolling.

[MDawg]

It’s an AP move to mess with UNKewlJ, especially if automated responses are in play. For a few seconds of time, hours of UNKewl time are burned up. Virtually endless free entertainment watching the

mental midget max. KJ

chase her own tail.

KJ keeps trying to manually rephrase the same old nervous essays over and over. Can you imagine how much time and angst that takes?

But man I hit a big multiplier.

[redietz]

KJ keeps trying to manually rephrase the same old nervous essays over and over. Can you imagine how much time and angst that takes?

But man I hit a big multiplier.

The funny thing is, kewlJ talking shit about anyone actually boosts the anyone's credibility. KewlJ's whole schtick is paraphrasing, quoting things nobody ever said, making shit up, and declaring stuff that never happened. It's a veritable cornucopia of variegated bullshit.

KewlJ, do me a favor. Post every day regarding me. Post a couple of times a day. And don't be shy. Use my full name: Robert Earl Dietz. Hell, put my address in the posts while you're at it. And don't forget, make sure to declare that I said things for which you can't find direct quotes. You might want to put that stuff in bold or caps.

I do think the Trumpster, at some point, is going to try to muscle through a revocation of forum owners not being legally responsible for posted content. That would be a hoot.

[mickeycrimm]

Has Mr. Munchkin emailed you yet, mickey?

I know you'll share it since you're a stand-up guy.

Yes. He confirmed that you declined the interview he asked for a couple of years ago. However, he said in your recent contact with him you told him you are now willing to do an interview. Problem is, its pretty much to late with him. You’re about 2 years to late.

Really sad that you are now trying to manipulate Munchkin.

I never declined any interview. If you want to put up a few bucks vis-a-vis a polygraph on that, I'm down for it. Munchkin was more interested in interviewing my superior half, so I felt it unseemly to push for moi. I understand that women make for more interesting interviews in gambling in general, so I wasn't offended. Plus she and he have some familial resonance.

But I never declined any interview. So if you want to take a stab at me on a polygraph and a reasonable wager, I am at your service. Could make for a compelling Poker Fraud Alert show.

In a DM exchange 2 days ago I reminded Richard of the DM where he said you turned him down two years ago. His response was "Yes, he did decline"

That's twice he's now told me you declined.

I really don't know what you think a lie detector test will prove but if you can talk Munchkin into taking one then go for it.

[mickeycrimm]

Redietz knows highly educated people, you know, college professors and shit. So perhaps redietz could get one of his college professor friends to deliver a white paper on how easy it is to beat lie detector tests.

[AxelWolf]

Well, Axelwolf, let me give an example of a quick flaw in your logic. I don't have an eidetic memory, but I used to have something close (if the strange words bother you, ask Shackleford) when it came to football. I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do. I was essentially adding hours, if not days, to applying the stats in my head as opposed to having to spend time learning them.

The bottom line -- while I wasn't doing anything different from other people in this instance, I was doing it much, much faster.

And I agree that I probably am not doing anything that's not well known -- LOL. I'm just doing more of it better.

Another example -- everything in a football season is time-related. You have hours to process info before lines come out Sunday night, then you have to act. Speed is everything because you need to get the best of numbers, especially in college football where you may have a third of the schedule moving two points or more any given week. And you have to be able to anticipate regarding where lines are likely to move, which is something I happen to be very, very good at.

Now if you hadn't considered the need for speed, then you really have no idea what you're dealing with on a weekly basis.

Again, Axelwolf with some insults. Axelwolf, which handicappers have you dialed up to discuss me? Because if you haven't done journalistic due diligence, why type an opinion with no information? I mean, it's just stupid. You think your opinion means something. It means nothing. You're an anonymous "AP" who thinks he's the master of all things. It's basically ridiculous. When it comes to sports betting, Boz probably knows ten times what you know, and has better judgement.

I've never claimed to be a master of all things; you're making shit up. Please show one post where I have indicated that? I can show posts right indicated the opposite. I would say I'm well versed in many areas of Advantage Play, and I've done many things that others haven't until after I had. I would say I'm pretty good at thinking outside the box and figuring out the best angles and angle shooting to make money from the casinos.

I'm sure many on this forum know much more about sports than I do. I'm sure there are new guys that come along that know more about sports than all of us do, including myself. I don't claim to be a Sports Guru, but I certainly know enough to spot bullshit when I see it. And I certainly know who knows what the fuck they're talking about.

Anytime I've ever mentioned your name to anyone nobody knows who the fuck you are unless they've been around on the forums. And again, I'm not a journalist, reporter, investigator or a professional fucking interviewer.

In a post, I asked you about me talking to Anthony Curtis regarding you, and you ignored it.

You can call me Anonymous all you want, but hundreds of people and the Gaming and Advantage Play Community know who I am and my real name.
And that's not just including other Unknown People. I have played with, partnered with, competed with, hung out with, been to parties with, worked with, done business with, and shared information with many well-known people in the gaming Advantage play community.

If you are neither a "journalist, reporter, investigator, or professional fucking interviewer," why would you want to interview me? What qualifies you? It's stupid. Step aside.

And why in God's name would I want to be interviewed by you? I mean, this is comical. Just step aside. Or don't. I'm going to call James Dennison tomorrow and see if he wants to film the interview live for entertainment value. It'll be good feedback for me and, if he can do it, I'm sure it'll be a fine test of my ability to think on my feet and be disciplined.

I have no idea about you "talking to Anthony Curtis" or Mr. Flowers or anyone. But it's not as if "Anthony Curtis" was quick to get into the whole sports betting gestalt or really had much (if any) interaction with sports bettors the first five to 10 years of the LVA. In fact, I was always surprised that the Advisor dragged its feet as long as it did, and then assembled a roster of people who were more advantage players than sports experts. I guess he assembled who he could, but I thought it was really tardy and he missed an opportunity.

Send along your email to integritysports@aol.com. Thanks.

This has already been discussed

" I'm NOT an interviewer, I'm not a reporter or investigative journalist. I don't claim to be a sports guru or know more about sports than you do. I do know some of the stuff you say is wrong. I would simply be a guest on the show, making some statements and asking some questions.

Im not Mission, Im not Dan, and Im not the Wizard, Dancer, or Munchkin. As I said before, all those guys are softballers when it comes to interviewing guests. Yes, as you put it, I would probably be more adversarial and call you out on some of the things you have said.

You have much experience with this sort of stuff, no? This should be an easy slam dunk no no-brainer for you. Or perhaps you only have experience with softball puff-pice hugs and kisses stuff.

So, yes, SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT. You already knew my "qualifications" long ago, when you gleefully welcomed my appearance on the show with you.


FYI, you're not special or talented enough to need anyone qualified to interview you. I worked for Billy Walteres, for a short time long ago, and needed to tout my supposed records to recruit investors for sports betting doesn't cut it.

I think you're actually worried now that I might be a tough and thorough adversarial guest, but of course, you can admit that.

[mickeycrimm]

Well, Axelwolf, let me give an example of a quick flaw in your logic. I don't have an eidetic memory, but I used to have something close (if the strange words bother you, ask Shackleford) when it came to football. I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do. I was essentially adding hours, if not days, to applying the stats in my head as opposed to having to spend time learning them.

The bottom line -- while I wasn't doing anything different from other people in this instance, I was doing it much, much faster.

And I agree that I probably am not doing anything that's not well known -- LOL. I'm just doing more of it better.

Another example -- everything in a football season is time-related. You have hours to process info before lines come out Sunday night, then you have to act. Speed is everything because you need to get the best of numbers, especially in college football where you may have a third of the schedule moving two points or more any given week. And you have to be able to anticipate regarding where lines are likely to move, which is something I happen to be very, very good at.

Now if you hadn't considered the need for speed, then you really have no idea what you're dealing with on a weekly basis.

Again, Axelwolf with some insults. Axelwolf, which handicappers have you dialed up to discuss me? Because if you haven't done journalistic due diligence, why type an opinion with no information? I mean, it's just stupid. You think your opinion means something. It means nothing. You're an anonymous "AP" who thinks he's the master of all things. It's basically ridiculous. When it comes to sports betting, Boz probably knows ten times what you know, and has better judgement.

I've never claimed to be a master of all things; you're making shit up. Please show one post where I have indicated that? I can show posts right indicated the opposite. I would say I'm well versed in many areas of Advantage Play, and I've done many things that others haven't until after I had. I would say I'm pretty good at thinking outside the box and figuring out the best angles and angle shooting to make money from the casinos.

I'm sure many on this forum know much more about sports than I do. I'm sure there are new guys that come along that know more about sports than all of us do, including myself. I don't claim to be a Sports Guru, but I certainly know enough to spot bullshit when I see it. And I certainly know who knows what the fuck they're talking about.

Anytime I've ever mentioned your name to anyone nobody knows who the fuck you are unless they've been around on the forums. And again, I'm not a journalist, reporter, investigator or a professional fucking interviewer.

In a post, I asked you about me talking to Anthony Curtis regarding you, and you ignored it.

You can call me Anonymous all you want, but hundreds of people and the Gaming and Advantage Play Community know who I am and my real name.
And that's not just including other Unknown People. I have played with, partnered with, competed with, hung out with, been to parties with, worked with, done business with, and shared information with many well-known people in the gaming Advantage play community.

If you are neither a "journalist, reporter, investigator, or professional fucking interviewer," why would you want to interview me? What qualifies you? It's stupid. Step aside.

And why in God's name would I want to be interviewed by you? I mean, this is comical. Just step aside. Or don't. I'm going to call James Dennison tomorrow and see if he wants to film the interview live for entertainment value. It'll be good feedback for me and, if he can do it, I'm sure it'll be a fine test of my ability to think on my feet and be disciplined.

I have no idea about you "talking to Anthony Curtis" or Mr. Flowers or anyone. But it's not as if "Anthony Curtis" was quick to get into the whole sports betting gestalt or really had much (if any) interaction with sports bettors the first five to 10 years of the LVA. In fact, I was always surprised that the Advisor dragged its feet as long as it did, and then assembled a roster of people who were more advantage players than sports experts. I guess he assembled who he could, but I thought it was really tardy and he missed an opportunity.

Send along your email to integritysports@aol.com. Thanks.

It's pretty clear ditz is going to turn this pokerfraudalert appearance into a farce. Count me out. There's better shit on Netflix.

[AxelWolf]

Well, Axelwolf, let me give an example of a quick flaw in your logic. I don't have an eidetic memory, but I used to have something close (if the strange words bother you, ask Shackleford) when it came to football. I could take the Sunday LA Times page of college stats, study it for half an hour, then spit back not precise but very close numbers for every game, covering almost all of the major statistical categories. Now it's true I wasn't doing anything other people couldn't do, if they had a couple of days instead of a few minutes to study the stats. But regardless, the fact remained that I could do in a few minutes what it would take most other people hours, or days, to do. I was essentially adding hours, if not days, to applying the stats in my head as opposed to having to spend time learning them.

The bottom line -- while I wasn't doing anything different from other people in this instance, I was doing it much, much faster.

And I agree that I probably am not doing anything that's not well known -- LOL. I'm just doing more of it better.

Another example -- everything in a football season is time-related. You have hours to process info before lines come out Sunday night, then you have to act. Speed is everything because you need to get the best of numbers, especially in college football where you may have a third of the schedule moving two points or more any given week. And you have to be able to anticipate regarding where lines are likely to move, which is something I happen to be very, very good at.

Now if you hadn't considered the need for speed, then you really have no idea what you're dealing with on a weekly basis.

Again, Axelwolf with some insults. Axelwolf, which handicappers have you dialed up to discuss me? Because if you haven't done journalistic due diligence, why type an opinion with no information? I mean, it's just stupid. You think your opinion means something. It means nothing. You're an anonymous "AP" who thinks he's the master of all things. It's basically ridiculous. When it comes to sports betting, Boz probably knows ten times what you know, and has better judgement.

I've never claimed to be a master of all things; you're making shit up. Please show one post where I have indicated that? I can show posts right indicated the opposite. I would say I'm well versed in many areas of Advantage Play, and I've done many things that others haven't until after I had. I would say I'm pretty good at thinking outside the box and figuring out the best angles and angle shooting to make money from the casinos.

I'm sure many on this forum know much more about sports than I do. I'm sure there are new guys that come along that know more about sports than all of us do, including myself. I don't claim to be a Sports Guru, but I certainly know enough to spot bullshit when I see it. And I certainly know who knows what the fuck they're talking about.

Anytime I've ever mentioned your name to anyone nobody knows who the fuck you are unless they've been around on the forums. And again, I'm not a journalist, reporter, investigator or a professional fucking interviewer.

In a post, I asked you about me talking to Anthony Curtis regarding you, and you ignored it.

You can call me Anonymous all you want, but hundreds of people and the Gaming and Advantage Play Community know who I am and my real name.
And that's not just including other Unknown People. I have played with, partnered with, competed with, hung out with, been to parties with, worked with, done business with, and shared information with many well-known people in the gaming Advantage play community.

If you are neither a "journalist, reporter, investigator, or professional fucking interviewer," why would you want to interview me? What qualifies you? It's stupid. Step aside.

And why in God's name would I want to be interviewed by you? I mean, this is comical. Just step aside. Or don't. I'm going to call James Dennison tomorrow and see if he wants to film the interview live for entertainment value. It'll be good feedback for me and, if he can do it, I'm sure it'll be a fine test of my ability to think on my feet and be disciplined.

I have no idea about you "talking to Anthony Curtis" or Mr. Flowers or anyone. But it's not as if "Anthony Curtis" was quick to get into the whole sports betting gestalt or really had much (if any) interaction with sports bettors the first five to 10 years of the LVA. In fact, I was always surprised that the Advisor dragged its feet as long as it did, and then assembled a roster of people who were more advantage players than sports experts. I guess he assembled who he could, but I thought it was really tardy and he missed an opportunity.

Send along your email to integritysports@aol.com. Thanks.

I brought up the Anthony Curtis thing more than once, I'm too lazy go go back and look.
The gist of it was, you were throwing around his name, and I said I had his personal number and I could call him, but I wanted to get your permission and see what was okay to ask and not.

FYI I already sent you my email via private message, use it, there's no need for me to email you my email; try using copy and paste. Also, I can't be certain but there's a good chance I emailed you in the past.