Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday View Post
"The lawsuit stated that King "spent the majority of the funds loaned by complainant to King Lending to gamble in Las Vegas fund an extravagant lifestyle, and for other personal uses by King".

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/tops...d=BingNewsSerp
Imagine that, someone playing with money that isn't theirs, while living in casinos for months at a time and spending money that isn't theirs. They got away with it for a very long time.
But were they endorsed by your old pal the Wizard?
To be fair, Mike never endorsed MDawg. He simply witnessed and reported what he saw for a fee.
From my understanding, based on one of Mike's posts that was later deleted. Mdawg didn't have any significant advantage, if at all. Damned by faint praise.

Come on, let's think about it, If the Wizard actually thought MDawg had an advantage as big as what MDawg would have us believe, there's no way that Mike wouldn't be highly interested. I've told Mike about a few plays and made a deal with him that were of much less value, ones that Mike was very interested in and actually played.