Lawyer allegedly embezzles and gambles millions in Vegas

[theywontpayontuesday]

"The lawsuit stated that King "spent the majority of the funds loaned by complainant to King Lending to gamble in Las Vegas fund an extravagant lifestyle, and for other personal uses by King".

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/tops...d=BingNewsSerp

[AxelWolf]

"The lawsuit stated that King "spent the majority of the funds loaned by complainant to King Lending to gamble in Las Vegas fund an extravagant lifestyle, and for other personal uses by King".

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/tops...d=BingNewsSerp

Imagine that, someone playing with money that isn't theirs, while living in casinos for months at a time and spending money that isn't theirs. They got away with it for a very long time.

[DGenBen]

What I don’t understand is how someone you’d assume has at least a small amount of intelligence as they were able to get a law degree, thinks this is a good idea or that they can get away with it.

[MisterV]

What I don’t understand is how someone you’d assume has at least a small amount of intelligence as they were able to get a law degree, thinks this is a good idea or that they can get away with it.

Narcissism + gambling problem?

LOL, the fact that someone has a law degree does not mean they automatically make the right decision all the time.

I recall one guy, he dressed like Sonny in "Miami Vice:" got disbarred for possessing less than $2K worth of blow.

Another guy got disbarred for threatening his GF with a gun.

But my favorite: a personal injury lawyer settled a big case for a teen age girl; he rented a limo and drove her around Portland to celebrate. Seems he gave her drugs in the limo and induced her to have sex with him. Later he was bragging about it to the limo driver. Oops...turns out the driver was an off-duty cop.

[jdaewoo]

Plenty of people with law degrees are retards.

[The Boz]

But my favorite: a personal injury lawyer settled a big case for a teen age girl; he rented a limo and drove her around Portland to celebrate. Seems he gave her drugs in the limo and induced her to have sex with him. Later he was bragging about it to the limo driver. Oops...turns out the driver was an off-duty cop.

Speaking of limos and lawyers, Obama got a pass for smoking crack in a limo while getting his cock sucked by the driver Larry Sinclair.

Just another failure of the media to cover a story that was negative to liberals while protecting a favorite son of theirs. It was the Hunter Biden laptop situation over a decade earlier. And we now know that was a true story.

[The Boz]

"The lawsuit stated that King "spent the majority of the funds loaned by complainant to King Lending to gamble in Las Vegas fund an extravagant lifestyle, and for other personal uses by King".

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/tops...d=BingNewsSerp

Imagine that, someone playing with money that isn't theirs, while living in casinos for months at a time and spending money that isn't theirs. They got away with it for a very long time.

But were they endorsed by your old pal the Wizard?

[AxelWolf]

"The lawsuit stated that King "spent the majority of the funds loaned by complainant to King Lending to gamble in Las Vegas fund an extravagant lifestyle, and for other personal uses by King".

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/tops...d=BingNewsSerp

Imagine that, someone playing with money that isn't theirs, while living in casinos for months at a time and spending money that isn't theirs. They got away with it for a very long time.

But were they endorsed by your old pal the Wizard?

To be fair, Mike never endorsed MDawg. He simply witnessed and reported what he saw for a fee.
From my understanding, based on one of Mike's posts that was later deleted. Mdawg didn't have any significant advantage, if at all. Damned by faint praise.

Come on, let's think about it, If the Wizard actually thought MDawg had an advantage as big as what MDawg would have us believe, there's no way that Mike wouldn't be highly interested. I've told Mike about a few plays and made a deal with him that were of much less value, ones that Mike was very interested in and actually played.

[kewlJ]

To be fair, Mike never endorsed MDawg. He simply witnessed and reported what he saw for a fee.
From my understanding, based on one of Mike's posts that was later deleted. Mdawg didn't have any significant advantage, if at all. Damned by faint praise.

Come on, let's think about it, If the Wizard actually thought MDawg had an advantage as big as what MDawg would have us believe, there's no way that Mike wouldn't be highly interested. I've told Mike about a few plays and made a deal with him that were of much less value, ones that Mike was very interested in and actually played.

Of course we can't KNOW what Mike thinks about Mdog because he apparently agreed not to say for some odd reason.

But there was a period on another forum that this Mdog was actually saying "wizard endorced", which was a lie. I made Mike aware of it and he must have said something because it stopped.

Prior to my brother and I hitting that blackjack machine play last year, I contacted Mike, looking to confirm the advantage on the play. He would only do so in exchange for the location of the machines we knew about, which I couldn't do. He wanted in on that play. So yeah, if Mdog was really doing something at an advantage there is no way Mike would have sat by and not wanted in. God, I wish the man would say what he thinks on the subject.

Anyway, my BF is home, gotta go. Have a great day and Axel, try to get a date set, by the time I return. Lets get this ball rolling!! Clear Dietz's name and get him the accolades he is entitled to.

[MDawg]

kewlJ has also been caught in a lot of lies over time, both on this forum and elsewhere. Therefore, it is unclear if he really makes much (or anything) playing blackjack these days.

kewlJ is basically the Boy Who Cried Wolf of these AP forums. He has lied so many times that it's impossible to believe any stories he tells.

[theywontpayontuesday]

MDAWG allegedly embezzles, then sends the money x2 anonymously once he pays them back.

[DGenBen]

What I don’t understand is how someone you’d assume has at least a small amount of intelligence as they were able to get a law degree, thinks this is a good idea or that they can get away with it.

Narcissism + gambling problem?

LOL, the fact that someone has a law degree does not mean they automatically make the right decision all the time.

I recall one guy, he dressed like Sonny in "Miami Vice:" got disbarred for possessing less than $2K worth of blow.

Another guy got disbarred for threatening his GF with a gun.

But my favorite: a personal injury lawyer settled a big case for a teen age girl; he rented a limo and drove her around Portland to celebrate. Seems he gave her drugs in the limo and induced her to have sex with him. Later he was bragging about it to the limo driver. Oops...turns out the driver was an off-duty cop.

Don’t lawyers have like a code of ethics they’re supposed to follow though?

(That last story is pretty funny)

[MisterV]

Yes, we take an oath to that effect.

Fortunately I've since retired, now I can let my freak flag fly

But "that other guy" (nod nod wink wink) claims to still be practicing law, so with nearly every post he he makes here he violates his solemn oath of attorney.

Hello, insight into one's character...or the lack thereof.

[theywontpayontuesday]

Yes, we take an oath to that effect.

Fortunately I've since retired, now I can let my freak flag fly

But "that other guy" (nod nod wink wink) claims to still be practicing law, so with nearly every post he he makes here he violates his solemn oath of attorney.

Hello, insight into one's character...or the lack thereof.

I'm such a blabbering mouth, would be my only flaw as a lawyer not counting a propensity to take all duels if they were still legal.

[Tasha]

What I don’t understand is how someone you’d assume has at least a small amount of intelligence as they were able to get a law degree, thinks this is a good idea or that they can get away with it.

Narcissism + gambling problem?

LOL, the fact that someone has a law degree does not mean they automatically make the right decision all the time.

I recall one guy, he dressed like Sonny in "Miami Vice:" got disbarred for possessing less than $2K worth of blow.

Another guy got disbarred for threatening his GF with a gun.

But my favorite: a personal injury lawyer settled a big case for a teen age girl; he rented a limo and drove her around Portland to celebrate. Seems he gave her drugs in the limo and induced her to have sex with him. Later he was bragging about it to the limo driver. Oops...turns out the driver was an off-duty cop.

I read about that "Limo Driver was off -duty cop!" Story too. I get that there was no way the Lawyer would have known that the Limo Driver was an off duty cop, but did he REALLY think even a normal limo Driver would be IMPRESSED that his Customer gave a MINOR drugs and basically RAPED her and not be absolutely horrified and disgusted?

[MisterV]

I read about that "Limo Driver was off -duty cop!" Story too. I get that there was no way the Lawyer would have known that the Limo Driver was an off duty cop, but did he REALLY think even a normal limo Driver would be IMPRESSED that his Customer gave a MINOR drugs and basically RAPED her and not be absolutely horrified and disgusted?

Portland was a Wide Open city toward the end of the last century, very hip, vibrant and above all a party town.

It would not be surprising for the attorney to think the driver wouldn't care, especially if as it seems the teen consented.

Odds are good that the lawyer gave the driver a rather large tip, hoping to buy his "discretion."

FWIW two of the three lawyers I mentioned later petitioned for reinstatement and were fully reinstated as attorneys after several years out in the cold.

[Rob.Singer]

Typical kew making up a story that mdawg loses big time with zero evidence, then expects everyone to run with it.

Face it people: none of you know--just as I do not know--how mdawg really fares with his casino action. Obviously, you folks don't WANT him to be winning, so some of you create reasons WHY you say he doesn't win. I also believe he's known to play at levels most or none of us can play at. This especially irks other players--especially the low rollers around here.

You attack him for being an attorney (is he really one? it doesn't matter to me). You attack him for being a recipient of an enormous amount of comps. And because kew seems to be particularly jealous of his reported gambling prowess and ESPECIALLY the fact that Wizard has "endorsed" him....just about every comment put into print by the little fairy with one dropped ball is comprised of lies (of course, kew's trademark).

Conclusion: I've seen mdawg make enuf challenges about much of what he claims and says, that are curiously ignored, dissed and/or criticized. Translation: when shit gets real, weak men make quick u-turns. Shack witnessed this guy play. No one else wants to. Why? Because they want things to go on being ambiguous so they can keep saying HE LOSES.

[AxelWolf]

Typical kew making up a story that mdawg loses big time with zero evidence, then expects everyone to run with it.

Face it people: none of you know--just as I do not know--how mdawg really fares with his casino action. Obviously, you folks don't WANT him to be winning, so some of you create reasons WHY you say he doesn't win. I also believe he's known to play at levels most or none of us can play at. This especially irks other players--especially the low rollers around here.

You attack him for being an attorney (is he really one? it doesn't matter to me). You attack him for being a recipient of an enormous amount of comps. And because kew seems to be particularly jealous of his reported gambling prowess and ESPECIALLY the fact that Wizard has "endorsed" him....just about every comment put into print by the little fairy with one dropped ball is comprised of lies (of course, kew's trademark).

Conclusion: I've seen mdawg make enuf challenges about much of what he claims and says, that are curiously ignored, dissed and/or criticized. Translation: when shit gets real, weak men make quick u-turns. Shack witnessed this guy play. No one else wants to. Why? Because they want things to go on being ambiguous so they can keep saying HE LOSES.

The challenges are ambiguous. Go read the wording and phrasing of the challenges and how it's set up. How can one challenge something where he says things are not posted in real time, and the challenge is only good for the duration of the trip? As soon as someone attempts to challenge him, he will/can just say his trip is over or some BS. They are crafted in such a way that he knows no one can really challenge him.

How can someone show proof that he has lied about a particular winning session without knowing the day and time of the session prior to making the challenge?

[Rob.Singer]

No one can go into one of these "challenges" without the parameters being pinned down while being bounded by sensibility. If someone is serious about seeing one of these challenges through, it would happen. That's how negotiations work....how deals are made.

I also know that no gambling challenge is verifiable stone-cold proof unless a witness were to walk side-by-side with mdawg 24 hours/day and for an agreed-to number of days.

None of this is easy. Yet Shack at least put in the effort (was he actually paid to do so?) to start to decipher the mystery. I'd be willing to offer MY services in whatever capacity to somehow get things started and done. Only no one need pay me because I am not in need of money like Mike was.

[mickeycrimm]

There is no way Wynn execs didnt know the woman had a major gambling problem. The real shame here is shes off to jail and they are off to the bank. They should be going to jail with her.