Originally Posted by Vegas_lover View Post
I don't! Results from the past are a guarantee for the future. He has delivered zero evidence to back up his claimes. Not anything useable in over 2500+ posts. Sometimes I wonder where you find the "strenght" to have any belief in the guy
He was a published columnist for GT years back, and he does have a reputation for big wins that were confirmed back then. That gives him a certain measure of credibility. However, that doesn't mean he shouldn't also back up his newest claims especially when they appear to be so extreme -- meaning so many big wins with such little play. But he might feel that he doesn't have to back up his new claims.

Personally, if I were him, I would jump at the chance to prove the big wins to let the world know he still has his magic touch. And if he is hitting those big wins with very little play (casino win/loss statements would help establish this) he could become a video poker folk hero and probably publish another book about it.