Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
... he does have a reputation for big wins that were confirmed back then.
And you know this because ????? Are we back to "because Rob said so"? It's funny how frequently that seems to be the answer to the question.

I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm just saying that there doesn't appear to be any verifiable information about it at this point, and I find the fact that Rob continually pushes it to be less than comforting.

Relying on something that can't be proven to help support another contention that can't be proven doesn't seem to be very wise.