Darryl's Background Story! :D

[Gottlob]

I never had a problem with Monty Hall...

Yes, he liked you, and, you always knew the door that you were behind ... the one that contained the old GOAT, himself, setting the world ablaze with his brains. Ha.

I pick door number three.

[pinchingyourballs]

Props to Mister Vee
Dwells in Reaper's head rent free
Goat of Vee Cee Tee

Bill Yung, get thee to
Electroshock therapy
The doctor is in

Garnabby's brain mush
Cannot evict Mister Vee
Release the Kraken

[MisterV]

TOE, or no TOE
What was the question?
Oh yeah.
Whether to waste one's life in pursuit of outrageous notions,
or to drink Molsons til blotto
and then shitting the bed.
-----
'tis a tale told by a gambler
chewing blubber, dressed oh so furry,
accomplishing nothing.

[Gottlob]

Oh, I guess that I'll have to go with the second line, because neither of you fools is anywhere near my head.
Ha.

Bill Yung, get thee to
Electroshock therapy
The doctor is in

---> The Periodic Table (short story collection). [In spot #1.]

https://anagram-solver.net/Bill%20Yu...n?partial=true


Well, what do you know, I was, just, writing about the periodic table above ... twice, as a matter of fact.

Props to Mister Vee
Dwells in Reaper's head rent free
Goat of Vee Cee Tee

Bill Yung, get thee to
Electroshock therapy
The doctor is in

Garnabby's brain mush
Cannot evict Mister Vee
Release the Kraken

[Gottlob]

TOE, or no TOE
What was the question?
Oh yeah.
Whether to waste one's life in pursuit of outrageous notions,
or to drink Molsons til blotto
and then shitting the bed.
-----
'tis a tale told by a gambler
chewing blubber, dressed oh so furry,
accomplishing nothing.

I never had a problem with Monty Hall...

---> Developmental abnormality. [In spot #1.]

https://anagram-solver.net/I%20never....?partial=true


Sigh. I was saving this one for the eVil's next post.

P.S. Even "the outrageous notions" have to fit in somewhere. Even the eVil. Ha.


Gottlob Gottlob is online now
Silver
Gottlob's AvatarJoin Date
Jul 2023
Posts
69

[MisterV]

His time run out, garnabby faced judgment by the fiery GOAT god.

"You always fancied yourself to be like a god at math garnabby but now how you spend eternity depends on how you answer one question:..."

Garnabby was barely paying attention, focused as he still was on finalizing the unfinished minutiae of his TOE, but he nodded his understanding.

"Very good. Now look there, you'll see three ice bergs. Behind one of them is the portal to blissful eternity; alas, behind a different one is eternal damnation, a place where you will be forever forced to read the fictions penned by Karen, aka Tasha, aka She Who Shits 'De 'Flo. The third one is of no consequence. Now, tell me which ice berg you select: to make it easier I'll give you a hint: it isn't behind the middle ice berg. OK, now choose."

Garnabby smiled at the fiery spectre, secure that his brilliance, his mastery of all things mathematical, and his understanding of how life really works (thanks to his life's work, his TOE) would inevitably lead to the correct choice.

"i choose..."



---to be continued

[Gottlob]

Fig. 4. Escher's Waterfall ('Waterval'). source: Hanover College

I never had a problem with Monty Hall...

---> deVvelopmental abnorMality. [In spot #1.]

https://anagram-solver.net/I%20never....?partial=true

[Gottlob]

Now, tell me which iceberg you select: to make it easier I'll give you a hint: it isn't behind the middle iceberg. OK, now choose."

---> The Doubt Machine: Inside the Koch Brothers' War on Climate Science. [First spot.]

https://anagram-solver.net/Now,%20te....?partial=true


There's no future in icebergs. Ha.

His time run out, garnabby faced judgment by the fiery GOAT god.

"You always fancied yourself to be like a god at math garnabby but now how you spend eternity depends on how you answer one question:..."

Garnabby was barely paying attention, focused as he still was on finalizing the unfinished minutiae of his TOE, but he nodded his understanding.

"Very good. Now look there, you'll see three ice bergs. Behind one of them is the portal to blissful eternity; alas, behind a different one is eternal damnation, a place where you will be forever forced to read the fictions penned by Karen, aka Tasha, aka She Who Shits 'De 'Flo. The third one is of no consequence. Now, tell me which ice berg you select: to make it easier I'll give you a hint: it isn't behind the middle ice berg. OK, now choose."

Garnabby smiled at the fiery spectre, secure that his brilliance, his mastery of all things mathematical, and his understanding of how life really works (thanks to his life's work, his TOE) would inevitably lead to the correct choice.

"i choose..."



---to be continued

Gottlob Gottlob is online now
Silver
Gottlob's AvatarJoin Date
Jul 2023
Posts
72

[Gottlob]

A bit of confirmation, if take out the 3 i's.

There Xs no future Xn Xcebergs. Ha.

---> The Three Graces (Rubens).

https://anagram-solver.net/There%20X....?partial=true

[MisterV]

Good grief!

I have to think that the painting of the three women represents "beauty" back in the day.

Ewww...compared to some (not enough, alas) of the gals one sees today they look fat, untoned, out of shape and unattractive.

[pinchingyourballs]

Good grief!

I have to think that the painting of the three women represents "beauty" back in the day.

Ewww...compared to some (not enough, alas) of the gals one sees today they look fat, untoned, out of shape and unattractive.

I think injecting abdominal fat back into the boobs and ass was not a thing back in those days. And only rich ladies of leisure who could afford food had the time to be artists models. Poor people would have been much leaner and more toned, but also too busy for this shit. Surely none of this is news to the university educated pot head?

Also the cellulite texture is added not because the artist thinks it's hawt but because it shows off his ability to paint realistic textures and light and shadow on skin. Someone admiring this in a museum would note his technical skill in that aspect.

Rubens was a master and you just can't reduce it to "ew, fat chicks."

[MisterV]

What was the point of painting such hideous harridans?

Surely it wasn't a family portrait commissioned by some rich merchant?

Was it renaissance porn, designed to appeal to the prurient interest of gout-afflicted, wig-wearing horn-dogs?

Not all the wealthy folk back in the day were chubbies, but I take your point: same thing recently in India where fatness is a physical demonstration of wealth, i.e. "Look at me, I can afford to buy lots of food and you can't."

I'll post images of two of my favorite paintings featuring ladies that would be considered eminently fuckable by current standards, one by Vermeer (I just completed a fascinating quasi-fictional account about its creation, GIRL WITH PEARL EARRING by Tracy Chevalier), and Renoir's LUNCHEON OF THE BOATING PARTY.

To be fair, the subjects in the Renoir are people of privilege in the eighteenth century, whereas the subject in the Vermeer was claimed by Chevalier to be a maid in Vermeer's household in 17th-century Delft, Holland ...gotta think Vermeer banged her: I know I would.

[pinchingyourballs]

Renoir's impressionist style and brush technique is very different from Rubens's baroque style and technique, not to mention 300 years of distance between them. That's plenty of time for tastes to change. The point of all the cellulite and dappled buttcheeks in a Rubens painting is just to show off his technical prowess and capturing those details. It's sort of like the difference between heavy camera filters and HD TV, everyone looks good with the former, and everyone looks hideous with the latter.

But hey, not everyone has to like Rubens. I just think he deserves a little more respect.

[MisterV]

Oh, I admire his technique, no question about his mastery; but cellulite?

C'mon, man...give us something attractive to festoon on the wall of our sitting room.

While I'm not gay I think detail work showing male musculature better showcases a painter's prowess at capturing anatomical details than does an accurate depiction of flabby asses and legs.

[MisterV]

Hey Karen, maybe you should write something new and not simply dredge up shit from your ancient past.

Use GIRL WITH PEARL EARRING as your launching point; discuss how she blushes and sighs whenever the eighteen year old daughter of her master nears her, barely able to contain her pent up sexual tension.

Dig deep into the subject of the recreational substances used by the elite and the common folk; hell, make it all up, we'd never know.

And diseases, with all their pustules, buboes, abscessed teeth and gums: and who can forget bleeding and leeches?

Finally, just think of the joy you'd have discussing all the symptoms of the then prevalent venereal diseases.

The Past could be your palette.

[Gottlob]

I guess that inner beauty lasts, and, invisible beauty is forever. Ha.

As long as I got my three g's, as in the Three Graces. And, just, in time, for Pentecost.

It commemorates the descent of the Holy Spirit on the Apostles and other followers of Jesus Christ while they were in Jerusalem celebrating the Feast of Weeks. [To mark the beginning of the church.]

The Three Graces, in Greek mythology, are a trio of goddesses representing beauty, grace, and charm, often depicted as sister figures. They are known by the names Aglaia (Beauty), Euphrosyne (Joy), and Thalia (Abundance). In Roman mythology, they are called the Gratiae.

[Gottlob]

Hmmm...why is the number 37 everywhere?

At some point, the TOE has to reconcile the universe's underlying pattern, in terms of the numerals, with that of infinitude/finitude. Namely, to produce the particular numerals that I've been spouting, all along. Numerals with min/max, and saddle-point, properties.

To explain the bit above, what remains, let's take a quick look at the remaining anagrams-with-gematria, namely, to do with the textbook quote above, about the Three Graces, which is what I do when the posters here go silent. Appropriately parsed, of course, to keep the related sentences together.

The Three 6r4ces, in 6reek mythology, 4re 4 trio of goddesses represent1ng 6e4uty, gr4ce 4nd ch4rm, often dep1cted 4s s1ster f1gures.

--->

The Correct Sounds for the Instruction of the People. [In first spot.]

Thue-Siegel-Schneider-Roth Theorem. [In spot 560.]

https://anagram-solver.net/The%20Thr....?partial=true

Th3y are known 6y th3 names A6laia (B3auty), 3uphrosyne (J0y), and Thalia (Abundanc3). In R0man mythol0gy, th3y are call3d the 6ratia3.

--->

Only My Undesirable Translation Talent Can Change the World. [In first spot.]

You and the Night and the Music (Mal Waldron album). [In spot 537.]

https://anagram-solver.net/Th3y%20ar...3?partial=true


Interestingly, both anagrams-with-gematria include three 6's. And, the first has eight 4's, as a's, for 8*4 = 32 = [(1 + 1) * 4^2] ---> 1/142, and, 84 = (73 + 11) ---> 1/137, with the second at eight 3's, for 8*3 = 24 = (10*√4 + 2^2) ---> 142, and, 83 = (73 + 10) ---> 137 . Along with four 1's, in the first; and, three 0's, in the second, in terms of the 4's for a's, and, 3's for e's, that were used.

And, (560 + 567) = 1097 = [1][0][3^2][7] ---> 137, but, (560 - 537) = 23 = (24 - 1) ---> 142 .

In mathematics, Roth's theorem or Thue–Siegel–Roth theorem is a fundamental result in diophantine approximation to algebraic numbers. It is of a qualitative type, stating that algebraic numbers cannot have many rational approximations that are 'very good'.

In other words, the integers, themselves, are the best connection to infinitude/finitude, and, hence, the best descriptors of the universe, in terms of the TOE.

Regarding the Three Graces individually:

[DGenBen]

To explain the bit above, what remains, let's take a quick look at the remaining anagrams-with-gematria, namely, to do with the textbook quote above, about the Three Graces, which is what I do when the posters here go silent. Appropriately parsed, of course, to keep the related sentences together.

The Three 6r4ces, in 6reek mythology, 4re 4 trio of goddesses represent1ng 6e4uty, gr4ce 4nd ch4rm, often dep1cted 4s s1ster f1gures.

--->

The Correct Sounds for the Instruction of the People. [In first spot.]

Thue-Siegel-Schneider-Roth Theorem. [In spot 560.]

https://anagram-solver.net/The%20Thr....?partial=true

Th3y are known 6y th3 names A6laia (B3auty), 3uphrosyne (J0y), and Thalia (Abundanc3). In R0man mythol0gy, th3y are call3d the 6ratia3.

--->

Only My Undesirable Translation Talent Can Change the World. [In first spot.]

You and the Night and the Music (Mal Waldron album). [In spot 537.]

https://anagram-solver.net/Th3y%20ar...3?partial=true


Interestingly, both anagrams-with-gematria include three 6's. And, the first has eight 4's, as a's, for 8*4 = 32 = [(1 + 1) * 4^2] ---> 1/142, and, 84 = (73 + 11) ---> 1/137, with the second at eight 3's, for 8*3 = 24 = (10*√4 + 2^2) ---> 142, and, 83 = (73 + 10) ---> 137 . Along with four 1's, in the first; and, three 0's, in the second, in terms of the 4's for a's, and, 3's for e's, that were used.

And, (560 + 567) = 1097 = [1][0][3^2][7] ---> 137, but, (560 - 537) = 23 = (24 - 1) ---> 142 .

In mathematics, Roth's theorem or Thue–Siegel–Roth theorem is a fundamental result in diophantine approximation to algebraic numbers. It is of a qualitative type, stating that algebraic numbers cannot have many rational approximations that are 'very good'.

In other words, the integers, themselves, are the best connection to infinitude/finitude, and, hence, the best descriptors of the universe, in terms of the TOE.

Regarding the Three Graces individually:

Will your TOE explain whether space & time are emergent or fundamental?

Is wave function a real physical thing or just a mathematical tool?

When I tried to send a crouton through a double slit to see if it was a particle or a wave, whether observed or unobserved, it came out as crumbs.

Possibly decohered due to environmental interaction… or possibly just crunchy.

[theywontpayontuesday]

You should just read these posts to the camera and make them interesting and post your youtube video links here. You'll maybe make it if you try.

[Gottlob]

Will your TOE explain whether space & time are emergent or fundamental?

One of the first things that I realized, from the outset, about forty years ago, was that there are no truly black holes, and, similarly, say, that space, nor time, just exists in the sense that we just move through either. They're still space, and time, but, rearranged (broken up) by factoring in matter, and motion. Were space, and time, purely continuous, or solid, however, then we wouldn't be able to enter, let alone move through, either, at all. It's the thus illogically perfect versions of such that make up the mind, not, the physical stuff. The mental is based on impossibility, but, the physical is based on possibility. Perfectly dense, or solid, matter may form only a type of point - with the perfect realm beyond us, anyway. Were perfect matter extended, then it would keep going, to prevent anything passing through space; and, were space as the same type of point, then there would be no way to extend it beyond. Nothing, itself, in pure form, can't move out of, beyond nothingness, but, it may have thus impetus, or usefulness, by starting all the way out, thus defined.

Is wave function a real physical thing or just a mathematical tool?

Mix the mental with the physical to form the quantum, as mental-physical (on the mental side), versus, the relative, as physical-mental (on the physical side). Nothing is just "a real physical thing or just a mathematical tool".

And, gravity starts out as quantum-relative, by which charge is thus combined while gravity, in likewise fashion, thus comes apart. Where all of these things go together/come apart to allow for universes to form other universes.