Originally Posted by Gottlob View Post
To explain the bit above, what remains, let's take a quick look at the remaining anagrams-with-gematria, namely, to do with the textbook quote above, about the Three Graces, which is what I do when the posters here go silent. Appropriately parsed, of course, to keep the related sentences together.

Originally Posted by Gottlob View Post
The Three 6r4ces, in 6reek mythology, 4re 4 trio of goddesses represent1ng 6e4uty, gr4ce 4nd ch4rm, often dep1cted 4s s1ster f1gures.
--->

The Correct Sounds for the Instruction of the People. [In first spot.]

Thue-Siegel-Schneider-Roth Theorem. [In spot 560.]

https://anagram-solver.net/The%20Thr....?partial=true


Originally Posted by Gottlob View Post
Th3y are known 6y th3 names A6laia (B3auty), 3uphrosyne (J0y), and Thalia (Abundanc3). In R0man mythol0gy, th3y are call3d the 6ratia3.
--->

Only My Undesirable Translation Talent Can Change the World. [In first spot.]

You and the Night and the Music (Mal Waldron album). [In spot 537.]

https://anagram-solver.net/Th3y%20ar...3?partial=true


Interestingly, both anagrams-with-gematria include three 6's. And, the first has eight 4's, as a's, for 8*4 = 32 = [(1 + 1) * 4^2] ---> 1/142, and, 84 = (73 + 11) ---> 1/137, with the second at eight 3's, for 8*3 = 24 = (10*√4 + 2^2) ---> 142, and, 83 = (73 + 10) ---> 137 . Along with four 1's, in the first; and, three 0's, in the second, in terms of the 4's for a's, and, 3's for e's, that were used.

And, (560 + 567) = 1097 = [1][0][3^2][7] ---> 137, but, (560 - 537) = 23 = (24 - 1) ---> 142 .

In mathematics, Roth's theorem or Thue–Siegel–Roth theorem is a fundamental result in diophantine approximation to algebraic numbers. It is of a qualitative type, stating that algebraic numbers cannot have many rational approximations that are 'very good'.
In other words, the integers, themselves, are the best connection to infinitude/finitude, and, hence, the best descriptors of the universe, in terms of the TOE.

Regarding the Three Graces individually:


Will your TOE explain whether space & time are emergent or fundamental?

Is wave function a real physical thing or just a mathematical tool?

When I tried to send a crouton through a double slit to see if it was a particle or a wave, whether observed or unobserved, it came out as crumbs.

Possibly decohered due to environmental interaction… or possibly just crunchy.