Originally Posted by mcap
I have considered both these thoughts or possibilities. It may very well turn out this isn't something I will not pursue for long. That this just isn't for me. I'll let you know.Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
I don't see how this would effect my BJ play much. I don't play rated when playing blackjack unless there is some unique reason to, which rarely occurs. And I am not playing rated playing slots either.
Playing rated is one of the first things I thought about when thinking about getting into this. As I have been discussing for years involving Mdawg and more recently involving Dietz's claims, there are two components to advantage play. 1) you need something mathematical (or a glitch, which is also sort of mathematical) that provides a player an advantage. And 2) and this in my mind is even more important than #1, is you have to be able to play that game or play. The biggest advantage in the world means nothing if you can't get any money down on it for long. So THAT has always been my top priority. And I don't see anything different about this.
And this number 2, component, being able to play and keep playing is what has always been missing or wrong with Mdawgs claims. You can't play rated where there is a easy to see record of your winning and losing and expect that casinos are just going to keep allowing you to win like that. And of late Redietz seems to have bumped into this same issue with his claims. According to him he has been playing the same group of sportsbooks for decades while winning, who knows what he claims and they have taken no action against him.
THAT is just not the way it works. B&M or online....if there is a record of your play and it shows constant winning, they wont want your action. Anyone not understanding this (Dawg and Dietz)....sounds like a hot dog company.....just doesn't understand the casino industry.
Reply With Quote