Originally Posted by redietz View Post

Actually, as it turns out, I have a fine grasp of Kelly Criterion. It's exactly as advertised. And that's why it's somewhat inappropriate (at best) and really, really inappropriate and stupid (at worst) to apply Kelly Criterion to sports wagering.

I mean, kewlJ, you cannot be this stupid. Just google Kelly Criterion and read the first couple of Wiki paragraphs. Did you ever take a probability course at Villanova? Sorry, that is what's called a rhetorical question.

Or -- LOL -- better yet, call into 714-244-6853 when I'm next available. If you're worried about me not taping the interview, I have a fine suggestion. You record it. Play it here. Play it on YouTube. Play it on American Bandstand.

And as soon as I get back from a few errands and dinner, I will post here about the fine conversation last night at "Dietz Call-In Time." Be here or be square.
I am showing you the courtesy of reading (and responding to) your reply, despite that you are blocked, because it is only fair to have you be able to respond. But if all you can do is the same old responses, that don't fly....don't bother.

I have no idea what all this phone number shit and trying to get people to call you privately is about?

I am thinking it is another part of you trying to accumulate all kinds of information from members here. Real names, email addressed, phone numbers. Next thing you know we will all be bombarded with text messages and emails from Dietz soliciting his "tout" business, as he apparently did with Rob Singer.

And finally....You don't learn about Kelly Criteria from fucking Wikipedia. WTF!!! Can't think of anything more disqualifying of yourself and claims that that statement.