Call-In Report for 6/27 -- Coach Belly in the House

[redietz]

You're still avoiding a real interview on PFA Radio.

Right -- making myself available for months, and publicly stating that ad nauseum, translates, in hobo-ese, as "still avoiding a real interview."

Makes sense.

I'm looking forward mightily to you conducting a "real interview" tonight. Record it and share it with the world at large.

Red, making yourself available for an interview to people who don't do interviews isn't a good look, and you know that. Where you keep appearing to be dodging, deflecting and diverting is when it comes to "making yourself be available" to those who actually DO the interviews.

We already know you're not being truthful about the Munchkin because I recently checked after mickey said you dodged him twice. What has Dan responded with? And have you inquired with wizard? Plus, being a big shot in the picks sales business, you MUST know several public interviewers on that side of the fence.

It all comes down to what everything else in life comes down to: IF YOU CARE ABOUT WANTING TO BE INTERVIEWED, YOU WILL BE INTERVIEWED. IF YOU ARE TRYING TO DUCK BEING INTERVIEWED, FOR WHATEVER REASON, YOU WILL NEVER BE INTERVIEWED.

Are you ready and more importantly, PREPARED, to shit or....or to get off the pot?

Great. Another experienced interviewing subject is calling in tonight. I will try to limit mickey to 30 minutes so we can fit you in. I appreciate your volunteering. We may be old, but we still got it!

[MisterV]

So email Dan today and get on his show ASAP, make it happen.

"Where's the beef?"

[redietz]

So email Dan today and get on his show ASAP, make it happen.

"Where's the beef?"

Already did that months ago. What am I supposed to do, make him an offer he can't refuse?

[MisterV]

Already did that months ago. What am I supposed to do, make him an offer he can't refuse?

OK, but why not email him now and ask to be on later today?

You seem willing to participate...hard to figure out who's hiding the ball here, and why.

[redietz]

Already did that months ago. What am I supposed to do, make him an offer he can't refuse?

OK, but why not email him now and ask to be on later today?

You seem willing to participate...hard to figure out who's hiding the ball here, and why.

He's in the WSOP right now. He's a professional poker player. The WSOP was from May 27 to July 16 this year.

And the sun rises in the east.

[kewlJ]

Druff did a 3 hour show just a few days ago.

So Dietz's "Druff is too busy right now" doesn't fly anymore that his other nonsense.

[redietz]

Druff did a 3 hour show just a few days ago.

So Dietz's "Druff is too busy right now" doesn't fly anymore that his other nonsense.

And let me guess -- the show was about the NHL? Oh, it wasn't!?! How stunning!!

Note I didn't say, "Druff is too busy right now." I said, "He's a professional poker player. The WSOP runs from May 27 until July 16."

Again, you can be sued for putting quotation marks around things you wish someone had said. And, if the Trumpster has his way, very shortly you are going to be able to sue forums that libel you in this way. People are going to have to learn to actually use quotation marks as directed by style manuals.

Now, kewlJ, he of the Villanova breeding, surely knows that if he had simply left out the adjective "Dietz's," he would have been on legal ground. But assigning direct provenance falsely is not only incorrect, but potentially libelous, and if the Trumpster has his way, libelous even on forums where the owner will be forced to shoulder the legal burden for the anonymous patrons.

[kewlJ]

Dietz, in reading a Rob Singer Post above, because it was quoted, I have to say that you should listen to your TROLL buddy Singer. You aren't doing yourself any favors with this tap-dance that has now gone on months with Dan Druff, years if you include Munchkin.

There are legitimate reasons not to do such an interview. Everything from not wanting to reveal certain topics, to that you just don't feel the interviewer is the best choice for an interview on this topic. But you just doing this tap dance and pretending to drag an interview along that you KNOW is never going to happen, well anyone that had any respect for you and was trying to keep and open mind, has surely lost that respect.

Not me....I am not in the open-mind category. I don't think there is anything you could have said, that would have caused me to change my mind.

Why did you ever bring up an interview, and if it was someone else that brought it up (mickeycrimm), why didn't you just say, you had no interest in that, giving a reason or not? I could have respected THAT more than this tap dance.

[redietz]

Meanwhile, I can't believe kewlJ, he of the EV expertise, did not call in tonight and record the conversation. Surely he knows his stuff. I can understand mickey not calling in -- those machines, after all, are demanding mistresses, but no kewlJ?

Very disappointing. I did expect an Axelwolf appearance, but maybe next time. I suspect Axelwolf has consulted Mr. Shackleford regarding definitions, but I could be wrong.

[redietz]

Dietz, in reading a Rob Singer Post above, because it was quoted, I have to say that you should listen to your TROLL buddy Singer. You aren't doing yourself any favors with this tap-dance that has now gone on months with Dan Druff, years if you include Munchkin.

There are legitimate reasons not to do such an interview. Everything from not wanting to reveal certain topics, to that you just don't feel the interviewer is the best choice for an interview on this topic. But you just doing this tap dance and pretending to drag an interview along that you KNOW is never going to happen, well anyone that had any respect for you and was trying to keep and open mind, has surely lost that respect.

Not me....I am not in the open-mind category. I don't think there is anything you could have said, that would have caused me to change my mind.

Why did you ever bring up an interview, and if it was someone else that brought it up (mickeycrimm), why didn't you just say, you had no interest in that, giving a reason or not? I could have respected THAT more than this tap dance.

You didn't call in tonight, and you had two hours to do so, and you could have recorded the interview. I certainly was available every single minute. Seems to me it's YOU who doesn't want to interview ME.

You do realize how absurd it is to criticize someone for NOT wanting to be interviewed when they publicly set up interview times EVERY WEEK? And offer to engage ANYONE about ANY TOPIC?

And next week, kewlJ, you'll once again have the same opportunity. And then you'll complain that I don't want to be interviewed. You are one confused dude (and I don't mean in a George Takei sense).

[kewlJ]

Dietz, you inviting people to call you IS NOT AN INTERVIEW. It is some weird act of a lonely desperate dude.

What we have been talking about for months, years is an interview by a qualified, knowledgeable about the subject interviewer, that goes out to a wide audience. And other players/people even more qualified being able to call in and ask questions would be even better.

For whatever reason, you have drug your feet and thrown up roadblocks on that occurring every step of the way.

Todd/Druff hasn't been helpful in just disappearing on the subject matter. I don't know what that is about....maybe he has decided it no longer interests his. But if you really wanted this to have occurred, it would have occurred by now. Instead, we have gotten one LONG, creepy tap dance.

[kewlJ]

Meanwhile, I can't believe kewlJ, he of the EV expertise,

I don't really like to refer to myself as an expert on most topics, but truth be told, I am an expert on Blackjack card counting EV. It is what I do for a living for 2 decades. And EV is NOT an opinion. Nor is it whatever other weird things you said just this week, something about it being after the fact or results are known. By its very definition EV has to occur before the results are know.

I mean do you know what the letters stand for? "Expected" means it is a prediction of the value of the play. I don't like to use the term "prediction' because you will equate that with opinion, which it is not. It is a prediction based on Math (formulas) and past results.

And EV never lies. If your EV in blackjack doesn't match up with actual results after a reasonable sample size you are doing something wrong or are figuring EV incorrectly. If your EV is sports betting doesn't match your actual results after a reasonable sample size, you are doing something wrong. With sports betting it may just be that the data being used of past results is not a big enough sample size to extract good data from.

But this idea of yours that EV is guess work or opinion just doesn't fly. EV is math and data based.

EV is just one of many things you have said that are wrong and don't make sense. Kelly/Wagering was another. I try to give people some slack, because sometimes people use different terminology. BUT that isn't what you have done. You have clearly shown a lack of understanding of several major components that someone playing for a living (at almost any phase of gambling) MUST KNOW!

You were better off when you didn't say much about sports betting and when you did you were VERY vague. And there weren't many people into sports betting around to question much. BUT about the time that it was revealed that you did much more sports betting "touting" than actual sports betting, you have tried to explain things in more detail and almost each time that you do, you reveal how little you really know. Especially about things someone MUST know to be a professional sports bettor (or any kind of professional gambler).

It always comes down to KNOWS what he is talking about vs just taking. It just took a little longer with you.

If you were to do an interview and it was with someone knowledgeable about the subject OR knowledgeable people could call in, I don't think you would come off very well at all. It would be 10 times worse than you saying things that are wrong on a forum. So I almost can't blame you for not doing it.

[Jexposed]

Meanwhile, I can't believe kewlJ, he of the EV expertise,

I don't really like to refer to myself as an expert on most topics, but truth be told, I am an expert on Blackjack card counting EV. It is what I do for a living for 2 decades. And EV is NOT an opinion. Nor is it whatever other weird things you said just this week, something about it being after the fact or results are known. By its very definition EV has to occur before the results are know.

I mean do you know what the letters stand for? "Expected" means it is a prediction of the value of the play. I don't like to use the term "prediction' because you will equate that with opinion, which it is not. It is a prediction based on Math (formulas) and past results.

And EV never lies. If your EV in blackjack doesn't match up with actual results after a reasonable sample size you are doing something wrong or are figuring EV incorrectly. If your EV is sports betting doesn't match your actual results after a reasonable sample size, you are doing something wrong. With sports betting it may just be that the data being used of past results is not a big enough sample size to extract good data from.

But this idea of yours that EV is guess work or opinion just doesn't fly. EV is math and data based.

EV is just one of many things you have said that are wrong and don't make sense. Kelly/Wagering was another. I try to give people some slack, because sometimes people use different terminology. BUT that isn't what you have done. You have clearly shown a lack of understanding of several major components that someone playing for a living (at almost any phase of gambling) MUST KNOW!

You were better off when you didn't say much about sports betting and when you did you were VERY vague. And there weren't many people into sports betting around to question much. BUT about the time that it was revealed that you did much more sports betting "touting" than actual sports betting, you have tried to explain things in more detail and almost each time that you do, you reveal how little you really know. Especially about things someone MUST know to be a professional sports bettor (or any kind of professional gambler).

It always comes down to KNOWS what he is talking about vs just taking. It just took a little longer with you.

If you were to do an interview and it was with someone knowledgeable about the subject OR knowledgeable people could call in, I don't think you would come off very well at all. It would be 10 times worse than you saying things that are wrong on a forum. So I almost can't blame you for not doing it.

Wow Jayvee baby you really having it rough time. You need to.get back on track and stop it with the spiraling. Maybe if you come clean with these peoples you get back on track. What you think? This really not good for your conditions.

[kewlJ]

Jexposed is a sock puppet account of one of the troll members of this forum. I pre-emptively put him on ignore last week when he was still lurking.

So you are wasting your time Jexposed. Just like Singer and dawg, I am not seeing whatever stupid troll posts you are making.

[MDawg]

You may positively feel the nervous insecurity of someone who feels the need to repeat over and over that she’s no longer reading so and so’s posts.

Yes she's a basket case.

[Rob.Singer]

Jexposed is a sock puppet account of one of the troll members of this forum. I pre-emptively put him on ignore last week when he was still lurking.

So you are wasting your time Jexposed. Just like Singer and dawg, I am not seeing whatever stupid troll posts you are making.

What a loser. Kew doesn't realize that if someone with his extremely weak constitution, pitifil self-worth, pathetic self-control, and his overall lacking-in-self-confidence character didn't really read every post written, there'd be no need or desire to keep on bringing up that he doesn't read them. It's like he tries to force-feed his lies when everyone knows he's a proven compulsive liar about basically everything.

He quite simply cannot help himself.

Hi kew!

[redietz]

Jexposed is a sock puppet account of one of the troll members of this forum. I pre-emptively put him on ignore last week when he was still lurking.

So you are wasting your time Jexposed. Just like Singer and dawg, I am not seeing whatever stupid troll posts you are making.

What a loser. Kew doesn't realize that if someone with his extremely weak constitution, pitifil self-worth, pathetic self-control, and his overall lacking-in-self-confidence character didn't really read every post written, there'd be no need or desire to keep on bringing up that he doesn't read them. It's like he tries to force-feed his lies when everyone knows he's a proven compulsive liar about basically everything.

He quite simply cannot help himself.

Hi kew!

His entire response to "Why don't YOU do an interview with me?" LOL.

So he admits he doesn't know what he's talking about, therefore is not qualified to interview me, but he keeps writing and commenting anyway, all the time, after defining himself as unqualified to deal with the subject.

This is what happens when you allow a maroon to talk himself into a logical corner. He has no out here. Either he knows enough to conduct an interview or he does not. And if he does not, then he should shut up and stop yapping about things he himself says he's not expert enough to discuss.

What comes next from this idiot? Let me guess. The forum should be held to a lower standard of discussion than an interview, so he should be able to say whatever he wants, regardless of his knowledge or expertise? In other words, it's a retard forum, so retards should say whatever they want about anything they want.

If anyone buys this line of anti-reasoning, okay, let's think for a moment. If kewlJ believes this, then why is he hassling MDawg and Singer? Surely they should be able to say whatever they want regardless of expertise, just as kewlJ is saying whatever he wants, even though he knows he's lacking in expertise.

And this is where we are -- kewlJ having painted himself into the classic logical corner with no explanation for his refusal to conduct an interview. Either he knows enough, in which case he should, or he does NOT know enough, in which case a normal person would shut up and/or apologize for commenting while not knowing enough.

Getting this guy to logically hang himself -- pretty easy. He just is incapable of thinking things through. I don't know much about blackjack, but he'd make a lousy chess player or football coach.