Big Casino Wins and Jackpots

[Alan Mendelson]

I'm not here to prove that I win what and how I say I do.

That's the funniest thing I ever read. Every time you post it's about how and why you do whether it involves your special plays, or ARTT, or discipline or whatever. Even when you comment about someone else winning it's about how the other person is doing it all wrong and is either destined to fail or is addicted because they don't do it your way.

Quite frankly, Rob, NO ONE knows what your way is, not even your most ardent supporters who continue to ask question after question.

Even I thought it was pretty clear about your "special plays" when it came to holding kickers and then we recently found out that even that simple rule was not a rule.

To be honest, if you can't come up with straight answers to legitimate questions you don't have a verifiable system and you have no right to make your claims about your system or your wins.

And a system that can't be verified is no system at all.

[a2a3dseddie]

To be honest, if you can't come up with straight answers to legitimate questions you don't have a verifiable system and you have no right to make your claims about your system or your wins.

And a system that can't be verified is no system at all.

[Rob.Singer]

That's the funniest thing I ever read. Every time you post it's about how and why you do whether it involves your special plays, or ARTT, or discipline or whatever. Even when you comment about someone else winning it's about how the other person is doing it all wrong and is either destined to fail or is addicted because they don't do it your way.

Quite frankly, Rob, NO ONE knows what your way is, not even your most ardent supporters who continue to ask question after question.

Even I thought it was pretty clear about your "special plays" when it came to holding kickers and then we recently found out that even that simple rule was not a rule.

To be honest, if you can't come up with straight answers to legitimate questions you don't have a verifiable system and you have no right to make your claims about your system or your wins.

And a system that can't be verified is no system at all.

Not a good idea Alan saying some of that. All you're doing is confirming that you do not understand something because you haven't the ability to learn it. I think I've tried to be as nice as possible in the past by loosely using the words "thick"....or "dense". In other words, you talk a big game here and you play higher limits than most, but you just don't have the aptitude to comprehend either that which is clearly explained to you, as I and Sling have detailed in ARTT, for example, multiple, multiple, multiple times, nor do you really have an interest in learning why you've lost so much, since taking time to do that would cut into your casino visits and ultimately, your need to spend hours and hours at the machines each visit because you just can't bear to leave the action behind. And here's a flash Alan--one which you've never understood, and frankly, couldn't. My strategies (aka "systems" to you) are based on mathematics, but unlike optimal strategy, they are not totally based on math. Remember? So for anyone who truly wanted to understand them would have to go into it comprehending that they are not 100% verifiable with the math, which in turn means they would need to have a bit more intelligence than the standard smart guy or math guy. And that's not you.