video poker in the media

[MisterV]

how is trying to be truthful "speaking ill of the dead?"

You're not being truthful, you're formulating opinions based on assumptions, then presenting your opinions as the truth, when you know the guy can't defend himself.

You're such a punk.

Of course he cannot "defend himself," moron: he's dead.

No need to "defend himself:" it is what it is, or should I say it was what it was.

I've no malice; I am however a historian.

I comment based on what I've read and believe to be true: more than mere "assumptions."

Alan commented quite a bit about his circumstances over time, or have you conveniently "forgotten?"