Kewlj giving back $300 out of pity?

[The Boz]

I JUST started taking the Market Research job seriously two months ago after being banned for using old Bingo cards, so I made the equivalent of an extra $200 a month.

So $50 a week, again the same as working 4 hours a week at minimum wage.

You truly are as stupid as they come.

Once again I ONLY work at the Market Research job when I want to, I literally only work roughly two hours every day at the Market Research job, plus I still have my regular job at Walgreens, so I'm doing great, not stupid.

2 hours a day, 30 or 31 days a month.

Tell us how many hours a month you are putting into it and your hourly wage.

And again, define “great”.

[Tasha]

Seems like a decent gig, actually, but the amount of money earned is minimal: you might want to google other "work from home" opportunities near you.

It's kind of minimal because I didn't take the Market Research job seriously until the bingo loophole advantage thing ended and I got banned for a year from that Casino. Had I taken the Market Research job seriously for a longer time, I would have made more like $2,000 by now just by answering Market Research questions.

[The Boz]

Seems like a decent gig, actually, but the amount of money earned is minimal: you might want to google other "work from home" opportunities near you.

It's kind of minimal because I didn't take the Market Research job seriously until the bingo loophole advantage thing ended and I got banned for a year from that Casino. Had I taken the Market Research job seriously for a longer time, I would have made more like $2,000 by now just by answering Market Research questions.

No, no you wouldn’t you stupid NIGGER!

[Tasha]

Seems like a decent gig, actually, but the amount of money earned is minimal: you might want to google other "work from home" opportunities near you.

It's kind of minimal because I didn't take the Market Research job seriously until the bingo loophole advantage thing ended and I got banned for a year from that Casino. Had I taken the Market Research job seriously for a longer time, I would have made more like $2,000 by now just by answering Market Research questions.

No, no you wouldn’t you stupid !

Yes, I would have. I started doing the Market Research job last year but didn't take it seriously yet. I already made over $400 in two months after taking it seriously. If I had taken the Market Research job seriously when I started around October of last year and had made $250 a month for over (I said roughly $200 a month, but that was just between the two main Market Research jobs. The other three Market Research jobs combined made me roughly an extra $50 a month. They pay considerably less than the two main Market Research jobs. So, $250 × 8 months is $2,000.

[The Boz]

It's kind of minimal because I didn't take the Market Research job seriously until the bingo loophole advantage thing ended and I got banned for a year from that Casino. Had I taken the Market Research job seriously for a longer time, I would have made more like $2,000 by now just by answering Market Research questions.

No, no you wouldn’t you stupid !

Yes, I would have. I started doing the Market Research job last year but didn't take it seriously yet. I already made over $400 in two months after taking it seriously. If I had taken the Market Research job seriously when I started around October of last year and had made $250 a month for over (I said roughly $200 a month, but that was just between the two main Market Research jobs. The other three Market Research jobs combined made me roughly an extra $50 a month. They pay considerably less than the two main Market Research jobs. So, $250 × 8 months is $2,000.

Again, 200 hours of work at a minimum wage job over 10 months. Or 4 hours a week.

No wonder you people live in poverty forever. Poor Mammie!

[Tasha]

No, no you wouldn’t you stupid !

Yes, I would have. I started doing the Market Research job last year but didn't take it seriously yet. I already made over $400 in two months after taking it seriously. If I had taken the Market Research job seriously when I started around October of last year and had made $250 a month for over (I said roughly $200 a month, but that was just between the two main Market Research jobs. The other three Market Research jobs combined made me roughly an extra $50 a month. They pay considerably less than the two main Market Research jobs. So, $250 × 8 months is $2,000.

Again, 200 hours of work at a minimum wage job over 10 months. Or 4 hours a week.

No wonder you people live in poverty forever. Poor Mammie!

What are you talking about? October-May is 8 months, not 10 months.

[Tasha]

https://photos.app.goo.gl/ktVaDuBTXUJNWP5w5

Here is a screenshot of one of the main Market Research jobs. I already cashed out the balance which is why my balance is basically nothing right now.

[Tasha]

I mentioned this situation on WOV without mentioning Kewlj and one of the Posters replied that an annoying Poster playing next to him kept trying to engage with him and the Poster tried to ignore him. The annoying Poster ended up getting big wins and giving him money out of his big wins.

The annoying player had stiffed a Bartender out of tips yet was giving money to some random gambling stranger playing next to him who was trying to ignore him.

The Poster said he didn't want the annoying Player's money, so he used that money to buy his Friends drinks and tipped the Bartender really well to make up for the annoying player stiffing him on his tips.

I, Tasha assumed this was going to be something like,"I felt bad for being annoyed and trying to ignore someone who ended up giving me a lot of money," but even I admitted I most likely would have been annoyed too and tried to ignore the annoying player too and it was good that the Poster decided to use the money he didn't want and use it to buy his Friends drinks and tip the Bartender really well.

[DGenBen]

The problem with taking free money from strangers is they may feel it obligates you to provide them with sexual favors later.

[Tasha]

The problem with taking free money from strangers is they may feel it obligates you to provide them with sexual favors later.

I'd agree with your statement but in the WOV case, these were two males, not a male and a female. Most men wouldn't be thinking of getting sexual favors from other men. There could be the thought of the person who gave the money expecting monetary favors later on like assuming that just because they gave someone money after winning big money that the other person owes them money when they hit big.

A Woman told me that she gave her Casino Friend $50 after she won a high paying spin at a slot machine and about a month later, she asked the Woman for $1 because she was short a dollar to buy a meal.

The second Woman was GAMBLING and told her rudely,"I ain't got none!" She could have easily cashed out and given her a dollar) The second Woman realized in horror that she said that to someone who had given her $50 just a month prior . The first Woman was shocked that someone she gave $50 to wouldn't even give her a dollar! The second woman started sucking up to the first Woman but the first Woman was like,"She showed me her true ugly colors and I am now just civil to her, no longer consider her a Friend."

[MisterV]

Most men wouldn't be thinking of getting sexual favors from other men.

You're asexual: how would you know such a thing?

It's WOV: ever hear the expression "Know your audience?"

[DGenBen]

Tasha, did you see the who’s gay & who’s not gay thread?

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...-who-isn-t-gay

Research has shown that 37% of men have at least one sexual experience to orgasim with another man sometime in their lives.

For priests it’s much higher.

[Tasha]

I should have said,"Many," men and not "Most men,". I personally think the guy who was annoying the other guy who was trying to ignore him and ending up giving him big money out of his winnings was trying to set him up into being asked for money later on. Like,"I gave you $500 last month, you OWE me a cut of YOUR big winnings now!"

[DGenBen]

I should have said,"Many," men and not "Most men,". I personally think the guy who was annoying the other guy who was trying to ignore him and ending up giving him big money out of his winnings was trying to set him up into being asked for money later on. Like,"I gave you $500 last month, you OWE me a cut of YOUR big winnings now!"

That is an interesting way to set someone up.

I wonder if it’s an old con artist trick?

Give someone lots of money to set them up so you can ask them for money later.

Those poor people will never even know what hit them after someone gives them lots of money.

[Tasha]

I should have said,"Many," men and not "Most men,". I personally think the guy who was annoying the other guy who was trying to ignore him and ending up giving him big money out of his winnings was trying to set him up into being asked for money later on. Like,"I gave you $500 last month, you OWE me a cut of YOUR big winnings now!"

That is an interesting way to set someone up.

I wonder if it’s an old con artist trick?

Give someone lots of money to set them up so you can ask them for money later.

Those poor people will never even know what hit them after someone gives them lots of money.

Not technically a con artist trick, but a devious manipulation ploy. A con artist trick would be something like taking an item off a shelf at a store and "returning," it for a full store credit. Or giving a Cashier a $20 and claiming you paid with a $100. A devious manipulation ploy is giving someone $500 and trying to set them up into feeling obligated to give them a cut of their winnings later on.

[DGenBen]

I should have said,"Many," men and not "Most men,". I personally think the guy who was annoying the other guy who was trying to ignore him and ending up giving him big money out of his winnings was trying to set him up into being asked for money later on. Like,"I gave you $500 last month, you OWE me a cut of YOUR big winnings now!"

That is an interesting way to set someone up.

I wonder if it’s an old con artist trick?

Give someone lots of money to set them up so you can ask them for money later.

Those poor people will never even know what hit them after someone gives them lots of money.

Not technically a con artist trick, but a devious manipulation ploy. A con artist trick would be something like taking an item off a shelf at a store and "returning," it for a full store credit. Or giving a Cashier a $20 and claiming you paid with a $100. A devious manipulation ploy is giving someone $500 and trying to set them up into feeling obligated to give them a cut of their winnings later on.

Got it! I’ll try that devious manipulation ploy tonight.

I’ll take stacks of $500 & hand them out to people at the casino so they feel obligated to give me a cut of their winnings later on.

Trip report on this incoming later………..

[MisterV]

. A devious manipulation ploy is giving someone $500 and trying to set them up into feeling obligated to give them a cut of their winnings later on.

That ain't a devious manuipulation, that is complete and abject STUPIDITY!

Thanks for posting...as always your posts warm my cockles with schadenfreude.

[kewlJ]

IIRC, Kewlj said that he was gambling in a Casino one day when a guy won a sudden $20,000 Jackpot on a $5 bet and was so excited, he impulsively gave a bunch of random gambling Strangers $300 a Person. He gave Kewlj $300 too.

Kewlj thought,"This guy REALLY shouldn't be giving random gambling Strangers in a Casino $300 a person just because he won $20,000 on a $5 jackpot. He's going to end up being broke and asking those people for his money back. He should be putting that money aside for bills and other living expenses, and putting some in saving, not giving random gambling Strangers in a Casino $300 a person. "

Tasha can you link to or quote to where I ever said ANYTHING like this? because I have no recollection of anything like this.

[Tasha]

IIRC, Kewlj said that he was gambling in a Casino one day when a guy won a sudden $20,000 Jackpot on a $5 bet and was so excited, he impulsively gave a bunch of random gambling Strangers $300 a Person. He gave Kewlj $300 too.

Kewlj thought,"This guy REALLY shouldn't be giving random gambling Strangers in a Casino $300 a person just because he won $20,000 on a $5 jackpot. He's going to end up being broke and asking those people for his money back. He should be putting that money aside for bills and other living expenses, and putting some in saving, not giving random gambling Strangers in a Casino $300 a person. "

Tasha can you link to or quote to where I ever said ANYTHING like this? because I have no recollection of anything like this.

I also said,"IIRC," that you were the one who got $300 from some random gambling stranger at a Casino and gave it back to him after he begged for it back, feeling sorry for him.