Originally Posted by
DGenBen
With all the changes they made to the revenue & expenditures in the B.B. Bill they had to go through a reconciliation process & there was a requirement that certain lost revenue had to be made up somewhere.
So knocking the gambling loss write off down to 90% makes it appear as tax revenue will increase by $10 Billion over a 10 year period and they needed that for the bill to pass through the reconciliation process.
Again may have some details wrong but that was the gist of it.
Also, not mentioned in the article but obviously targeting a small generally unsympathetic group without any lobby like gamblers (casinos have strong lobbies but gamblers do not) is a savvy political move.