For the Legal Record

[MisterV]

suggest you post pictures of these records

File a Motion to Compel for discovery.

This would assume that these birds pony up big cash to hire attorneys to litigate the matter...not bloody likely.

UNLESS...holy shit...I can just see back channel communications between redietz and the hound where redietz agrees to let the hound represent him PRO BONO in a defamation lawsuit.

The hound seems wealthy, so I assume he got at least SOME of that wealth from practicing law, so I assume he'd know how to litigate.

And boy howdy, i have to think the hound would walk a mile for a camel just for such an opportunity to unmask and "punish" his forum nemesis.

Wouldn't that just be the Perfect Storm?

[kewlJ]

No one has seen the roll over requirements you got. So some might say "that isn't how the math works.". How would you respond to them?

I have already gone over this many times. Why do we have to do it again?

I started my bonus whoring sportsbook play in sept 2023. prior to that I just bet recreationally. And mostly lost like a recreational bettor. And I used 2-3 sports books for many years as that recreational losing (mostly) player.

So start of football season when I began my bonus play, I negotiated great terms with 2 of those 3 books (many people don't even know that you can negotiate terms). In exchange for the bigger deposit I made that year to start my bonus play, they were happy to give me really fantastic terms, based on my track record. these were NOT terms on their website. I negotiated these terms with the "host" (really just a common acct rep)

Second time through term were not as good (as I expected they wouldn't be). Third time through only what was commonly advertised and the 4th time through one book stopped all bonus offers. I could deposit money and bet, but no bonus. That was the end of THAT book. the other book that was of the originals stiffed me end of last year. And that was the end of THAT books. So the 5 books I currently have are not the books I started with that I negotiated great and good terms for a cycle or two, despite the redietz keeps insisting they are. And I expect to wear these books out too at some point, in which case I move on to new books, or decide for me, the play has run it's course.

So THAT is why I was able to get terms that "no one" (meaning axelwolf) wasn't familiar with. for a couple cycles. Having a track record as a losing player actually helped me negotiate a better deal.

[coach belly]

Wouldn't that just be the Perfect Storm?

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.

tewlj's contact info needed to expeditiously file Pleadings.

[kewlJ]

suggest you post pictures of these records

File a Motion to Compel for discovery.

This would assume that these birds pony up big cash to hire attorneys to litigate the matter...not bloody likely.

UNLESS...holy shit...I can just see back channel communications between redietz and the hound where redietz agrees to let the hound represent him PRO BONO in a defamation lawsuit.

The hound seems wealthy, so I assume he got at least SOME of that wealth from practicing law, so I assume he'd know how to litigate.

And boy howdy, i have to think the hound would walk a mile for a camel just for such an opportunity to unmask and "punish" his forum nemesis.

Wouldn't that just be the Perfect Storm?

Boy, you have the BIG spoon out stirring today don't ya MrV?

This is an anonymous internet forum. I have expressed my opinion about redietz and his claims.

there is no law suit in that. But if there was, I could counter sue, because remember who started all the KJ is a prostitute shit. It was redietz. Others like seedvalue and dawg repeated it, but it was redietz that started it. he knew exactly what he was doing and that it was a lie.

[coach belly]

I could counter sue

You don't have standing to sue, you're anonymous and can't prove damages.

And that won't change just because redietz files.

[MisterV]

KJ, I'm not saying he SHOULD sue...hell, I think it would be nearly insane for him to do so...in a NORMAL situation.

But here: both of them hate your guts, so why wouldn't they join forces to try and smite / expose you?

Oh, CB is incorrect about needing your contact info to sue...they can get it via subpoena after filing suit in Clark county court.

Then again "money talks, bullshit walks..." it would take both time and money to do this, and I wonder whether redietz has the money for costs and I doubt the hound wants to spend the time: unless of course he is what he says he is and he feels toward you the way he says he does.

This could be interesting.

[coach belly]

I think it would be nearly insane for him to do so...in a NORMAL situation.

Why is that?

[kewlJ]

I could counter sue

You don't have standing to sue, you're anonymous and can't prove damages.

And that won't change just because redietz files.

Don't be so sure, belly. Just because i don't use my real name on an anonymous internet forum (<-), doesn't mean there aren't people here and on other forums reading that don't know my name and who I am. Therefore my reputation has been damaged.

now what damages do you think redietz has, not that it matters as this is all silly talk (hypathetical).

[MisterV]

I think it would be nearly insane for him to do so...in a NORMAL situation.

Why is that?

Easy.

In a normal context it wouldn't pass any rational cost/benefit analysis.

Litigation is very expensive, and I see ZERO damage award to redietz: how the hell has his reputation been damaged?

What, can he prove he lost clients / business over it?

Only a few people have read the original alleged defamatory comment.

Awww,did his little feelings get hurt?

"Grow a pair" says the jury.

No, a lawsuit would be purely for shits, giggles, and to vent sadistic tendencies: the hound says he's a lawyer, so just maybe...

[kewlJ]

KJ, I'm not saying he SHOULD sue...hell, I think it would be nearly insane for him to do so...in a NORMAL situation.

But here: both of them hate your guts, so why wouldn't they join forces to try and smite / expose you?

Oh, CB is incorrect about needing your contact info to sue...they can get it via subpoena after filing suit in Clark county court.

Then again "money talks, bullshit walks..." it would take both time and money to do this, and I wonder whether redietz has the money for costs and I doubt the hound wants to spend the time: unless of course he is what he says he is and he feels toward you the way he says he does.

This could be interesting.

I am not worried about it Mrv. Go to any internet forum, or social media outlet and read about everyone sueing one-another. How many actually happen? About the same number of hairs of dietz's head.

[MisterV]

I am not worried about it Mrv. Go to any internet forum, or social media outlet and read about everyone sueing one-another. How many actually happen? About the same number of hairs of dietz's head.

Years ago I followed a similar lawsuit filed by a NJ father and daughter against a bitter California troll who attacked them on a cruise board.

An abosolute clusterfuck: zero satisfaction...except tor the attorneys who made money hand over fist.

[coach belly]

I am not worried about it. How many actually happen?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gersh_v._Anglin

Attorney Dinielli said in a statement after the judgment, "We will go to the ends of the earth to collect the judgment on behalf of our client, whether it's cash, assets, or intellectual property".

Seems worth a shot, and perhaps a Go Fund Me page to support dietz's efforts to enlighten an arrogant sociopath.

[mickeycrimm]

I and every other member here, has a right to express our opinion

You are entitled to your own opinion, but not entitled to publicly express demonstrably incorrect assertions as fact.

Defamation is not protected speech.

I don't understand why Druff would protect you from dietz's legal recourse, considering all of your anti-semitic rhetoric and recent barrage of insults towards Druff regarding his administration of this forum.

But once CDA Section 230 is repealed next year, he won't be able to protect you.

Until then, dietz will have to rely on his family members' generosity and skill, combined with paid legal representation, to bring you to justice.

Remember, Moses found you, so you can be found...easily found using online forensics and PIs.

The tech giants will kill the 230 repeal. No chance it goes. Even if it did it can't be retroactive.

[mcap]

I am not worried about it. How many actually happen?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gersh_v._Anglin

Attorney Dinielli said in a statement after the judgment, "We will go to the ends of the earth to collect the judgment on behalf of our client, whether it's cash, assets, or intellectual property".

Seems worth a shot, and perhaps a Go Fund Me page to support dietz's efforts to enlighten an arrogant sociopath.

Maybe leave this one to the internet lawyers little fella.

[mickeycrimm]

KJ, I'm not saying he SHOULD sue...hell, I think it would be nearly insane for him to do so...in a NORMAL situation.

But here: both of them hate your guts, so why wouldn't they join forces to try and smite / expose you?

Oh, CB is incorrect about needing your contact info to sue...they can get it via subpoena after filing suit in Clark county court.

Then again "money talks, bullshit walks..." it would take both time and money to do this, and I wonder whether redietz has the money for costs and I doubt the hound wants to spend the time: unless of course he is what he says he is and he feels toward you the way he says he does.

This could be interesting.

It would be fun making redietz make several court appearances over trivial shit. LOL. Having to travel back and forth from Tenfuckey.

[kewlJ]

Maybe get Dietz under oath and we could ask him some podcast questions.

[coach belly]

Having to travel back and forth from Tenfuckey.

Couldn't he file in the state where he resides?

[coach belly]

Maybe get Dietz under oath and we could ask him some podcast questions.

The defense will have an opportunity to depose and cross-examine the plaintiff.

[coach belly]

Maybe leave this one to the internet lawyers

No I don't think I will.

I think I'll toss your suggestion onto the trash heap with your mother.

[coach belly]

The tech giants will kill the 230 repeal. No chance it goes. Even if it did it can't be retroactive.

If tewlj behaves himself moving forward, then perhaps he won't be burdened by any impending disclosure.

There are the calls to sunset Section 230 entirely. A forthcoming bipartisan bill led by Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) proposes to sunset Section 230 on January 1, 2027

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article...on-section-230