Wearing my "investigative reporter hat" for a moment:Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Dan haven't you figured it out yet? Rob conveniently avoids playing with a "card" so that there is no win/loss statement. Despite his recent claims that he has made 7Stars we don't know if that is true or even if a card was used all or part of the time.
Rob, by telling us, that he has offset his taxable wins with "business expenses" also eliminates the chance that any tax records would verify his claims.
Now, in all fairness to Rob, I am sure he has had his share of big winners. The reality is that all video poker players have some big winners including royals and quads with kickers. My son hit five (5) royals in 24 hours one weekend. I saw my offers from Pechanga collapse when I hit two $20K royals one month apart plus a multitude of quad Aces with kickers during the same time frame. The point is people do win.
The only question here is actually the frequency of Rob's wins. I am sure his photos in Gaming Today were valid. I am sure he recently had a "rush" of quads with kickers. But Rob probably will never be able to prove to any reasonable person's satisfaction that these big winners came with the limited amount of play that Rob has claimed. I am sure that he has his "true believers" who will believe anything he says -- but I am not one of them.
Spock has done an excellent job of pinpointing some of the claims that Rob made and while I would like to see Rob verify his claims, it would be impossible because we know Rob can't produce tax records or even win/loss statements. And because he can't produce any reasonable proof he will continue his belligerent attacks and insults and probably will also make crazy demands for his challengers to put up "cash" in some sort of contest or challenge to see his proof.
I wish I had the money for such a challenge -- because I really doubt Rob has any proof outside of photos or W2Gs of particular wins which by themselves do not constitute any proof at all of his performance level.
To be blunt, we are arguing with a ghost and with a fairy tale.
If Rob really were the "big winner" he would have had the proof to show it. But alas, he avoided any attempt at maintaining proof.
That's how I see it.
Reply With Quote
