tax transcripts have arrived

[Rob.Singer]

Arci, instead of showing us all how very lonely and hurtful the holiday season can be for those who've buried a spouse , how about answering how it's possible to get transcripts for any of the years I filed as a professional gambler. C'Mon, I'm trying to get 2008 + 2009 ordered for Alan.

So stop all the pre-shock posturing, accept my simple bet, and give me some help here. Or, you can get some credibility back and send Alan your filled in 4506 form to order 2005 thru 2009 (which he will mail in) tax returns like you originally proposed (remember that?) And when he receives them I'll do the same. Just as it was from the start, and all your lying & running around trying to disrupt your original challenge will be labeled "expected, but no harm/no foul".

Hahaha! Dollars to donuts arci's finding himself backtracking over his comments that he can get 10 years of transcripts. The scrambling around his little duplex must be hilarious right now!....although not having that sickly zombie around has GOT to be helpful and inspiring.

[Rob.Singer]

I'm not hiding.

I did my part, and await Alan's examination of whatever forms he received.

I like this. Every time arci thinks he's being clever, he gets slapped down again. And that's what I like about know-it-all nerds: they keep coming back for more.

Has ANYTHING going right for you over the past 5 years?

[redietz]

I think I just realized something. The years Rob won, he was "a professional." The years he lost, he was "an AP" or "retired."

I have some friends like that. The nights they pick up women, they are single. The nights they go home to their wives, they are not. Makes sense.

[slobdinger]

What a great New Year's present. I'm having so much fun watching Rob squirm.

[slobdinger]

I like this. Every time arci thinks he's being clever, he gets slapped down again. And that's what I like about know-it-all nerds: they keep coming back for more.

Has ANYTHING going right for you over the past 5 years?

Rob, you've been telling your followers for ten years that there is no way arci ever had even one winning year. That goes along with your schtick of "AP's can't win" by using scientific methods. Of course, you really had no way of knowing whether arci won or not. You just invented the whole thing up in your convoluted mind to further your own agenda.

What lies to your followers will you come up with next after its proven that arci is a winner?

[slobdinger]

So maybe all those envelopes Alan received are year-by-year rejection letters for the older years? Sounds like what a Gov't. agency would do.

Hope springs eternal doesn't it, Rob. That's about all you can hope for now, isn't it.

[jbjb]

What lies to your followers will you come up with next after its proven that arci is a winner?

The only followers he has are the alter egos he creates like Jerry Logan.

[Rob.Singer]

Jerry Logan is a friend and he sent me a text on Christmas. He's also someone I've trained and from what I hear he is still having success. That has to be why you think he's me or something. Arci does that all the time on various forums (see his coach belly misrepresentations for proof right here) and looks foolish every time he does it. No wonder you wish to stay anonymous.

[Rob.Singer]

Hope springs eternal doesn't it, Rob. That's about all you can hope for now, isn't it.

No mickey, wrong again. If you noticed, arci cherry-picked a few years then said he asked for 10. That means he knew he could submit one or two years where he stated he had won, then tried to pull the wool over everybody's eyes by pretending to know all the other losing years would arrive when in reality he could read the form and knew they wouldn't. Safe again...or so he thought. But even a monkey can win 2 out of 10. Ask yourself something real: Why do you think he changed from tax returns to transcripts? Bingo! Because he knew he'd have to show mostly losing years with returns, thereby perpetuating all of his AP lies with that transcript deception. He in fact bailed himself out, but only uneducated drifters like you wouldn't see that.

I'm actually hoping there's 10 years of transcripts in there. Then we'll know he duped Alan with his own made-up transcripts mailed in phony IRS envelopes from a city that doesn't mail them out.

Besides, if he shows even 1 year where he claimed a win and happily paid taxes on it, what kind of fool would that be? What Schedule A filer who wins doesn't mitigate all claimed wins with claimed losses on Schedule A? I don't believe you know any of this though because you never file. At least yet.

[Rob.Singer]

I think I just realized something. The years Rob won, he was "a professional." The years he lost, he was "an AP" or "retired."

I have some friends like that. The nights they pick up women, they are single. The nights they go home to their wives, they are not. Makes sense.

You know the facts better than that. I've won as a professional and now as retired. If I were a loser since retiring from pro play I wouldn't bother with vp any longer.

Methinks you struggle with effective verbage at times.

[redietz]

That would be "verbiage," Rob.

So what is the gist of all this? I've followed this forum forever, and arci never claimed to have won every year. So what exactly is the point of his giving Alan his transcripts? To demonstrate that he's had winning years?

And Rob won't give Alan his transcripts or returns why exactly? So that -- help me out here -- he won't demonstrate what? I'm confused.

If arci has won and his taxes show that, does that mean Rob's "AP's cannot win" rant has been debunked? Hell, nobody believes that, anyway.

[redietz]

If there are 10 years of transcripts from arci, then Rob says arci is duping Alan with made-up transcripts in fake IRS envelopes from phony cities? Rob, what the hell are you smoking? Do you hear yourself, man? Come on, get a grip here.

Rob's been nipping eggnog today.

[arcimede$]

Arci, instead of showing us all how very lonely and hurtful the holiday season can be for those who've buried a spouse ,

More projection. LOL.

how about answering how it's possible to get transcripts for any of the years I filed as a professional gambler. C'Mon, I'm trying to get 2008 + 2009 ordered for Alan.

Gee Rob, you told us you already ordered tax forms for those years and then cancelled it. Why would you need help?

So stop all the pre-shock posturing, accept my simple bet, and give me some help here. Or, you can get some credibility back and send Alan your filled in 4506 form to order 2005 thru 2009 (which he will mail in) tax returns like you originally proposed (remember that?) And when he receives them I'll do the same. Just as it was from the start, and all your lying & running around trying to disrupt your original challenge will be labeled "expected, but no harm/no foul".

I only proposed we get our tax information to Alan. I've never cared how we did it. Everyone already knows you are simply deflecting to avoid facing reality. You will never send Alan your forms. Your tax forms demonstrate you lied. By not sending in for the forms you also demonstrate you lied. End of story.

Hahaha! Dollars to donuts arci's finding himself backtracking over his comments that he can get 10 years of transcripts. The scrambling around his little duplex must be hilarious right now!....although not having that sickly zombie around has GOT to be helpful and inspiring.

I never said I could get 10 years of transcripts. I stated I sent in for the 2004-2014 years and we would see what would happen. If Alan really got 10 years (actually 11 years), I will be completely surprised. The IRS will have exceeded my expectations.

[arcimede$]

If there are 10 years of transcripts from arci, then Rob says arci is duping Alan with made-up transcripts in fake IRS envelopes from phony cities? Rob, what the hell are you smoking? Do you hear yourself, man? Come on, get a grip here.

Rob's projection already told us .... he is "scrambling". He is hoping he can come with something, anything ... to escape the hole he has dug for himself. I think he realizes the whole transcript vs. photocopy argument is a loser. He has nothing else. It's your basic catch 22. This is the end.

[Rob.Singer]

If there are 10 years of transcripts from arci, then Rob says arci is duping Alan with made-up transcripts in fake IRS envelopes from phony cities? Rob, what the hell are you smoking? Do you hear yourself, man? Come on, get a grip here.

Rob's been nipping eggnog today.

Instead of sympathizing with arci, you might like to use the facts to form a reply. So please explain, if the forms say only 3 + the current year's transcripts are available--and if somehow 10 show up in the mail--what would be your conclusion? Got anything? Or do you feel "safer" ignoring it again?

[Rob.Singer]

Now for the good part. In the "Final Opportunity" thread, our friend arci said this:

Good news folks. I found another IRS form, 4506T-EZ, which assumes the requested form is the 1040 and does not appear to have any date restrictions. While you can fill out the form online, you cannot submit it directly. So, I will print off one for the dates 2011-2014. I will then send in another form for 2007-2010 and yet another for 2004-2006. That should be sufficient. Those are all the years I have claimed to have won (except for 2014).

Hmmm....this looks like not 10, but ELEVEN YEARS that the liar asked for (which he obviously already knew only 4 would be available). Even more obvious is how he tried in vain to make everybody believe he was "doing his darndest" to retrieve more than the 4 allowable years, just to keep that needed perception "alive & well". And, at the start he was only interested in Alan reviewing my professional filing status years, known to all as 2000-2009. So why did he suddenly change his own conditions from tax returns to transcripts? My side is already splitting--It's just too laughable to say again.

Yet TODAY in this thread, he says this:

I never said I could get 10 years of transcripts. I stated I sent in for the 2004-2014 years and we would see what would happen. If Alan really got 10 years (actually 11 years), I will be completely surprised. The IRS will have exceeded my expectations.

Really? Exactly where did you say "we'll see what happens"? Now, with the heat turned up to HIGH, it's suddenly "I will be completely surprised--the IRS will have exceeded my expectations"!!

Oops!....I'm sorry arci. Every one of those forms he said he sent in clearly states that transcripts can be sent out, for free, for the current year and the past 3 years only. Further, on the IRS website which any "mensa" would take the time to read before making any kind of claim on something so important to him, it also very clearly states that if the taxpayer wants earlier copies of transcripts they would need to fill out form 4506 and get TAX RETURNS at 50 bucks a copy.

Like I've said multiple times: Arci changed the conditions as soon as I accepted to fetch tax returns. He's caught in his own trap again, and I've proven him a proven liar once more. Just toooo funny!

Now please my good pal, go back to crying over the wife you put into her grave years earlier than she should have. You keep getting caught lying on here and you'll even embarrass that hick mickey. And how ya gonna spin these facts arci? Let's see some more of that "Robbie" & "projection" stuff you repeat every time I seriously get on your nerves....

[redietz]

Rob, I'm still confused, man. Are you saying Alan has fake forms in his office mailbox or not? If the transcripts are valid, what is your beef? You are bothered by the IRS doing more than is stated on their site? What's so wild about that?

[slobdinger]

squirm, robbie, squirm. It's hilarious watching you squirm.

[arcimede$]

The little worm is squirming big time. Notice how he has now resorted to trying to redefine what I stated. First our worm reposted this item that I posted when I first found the simplefied EZ form:

"Good news folks. I found another IRS form, 4506T-EZ, which assumes the requested form is the 1040 and does not appear to have any date restrictions. While you can fill out the form online, you cannot submit it directly. So, I will print off one for the dates 2011-2014. I will then send in another form for 2007-2010 and yet another for 2004-2006. That should be sufficient. Those are all the years I have claimed to have won (except for 2014)."

But skipped over where I said a little later:.

"As for what years Alan is getting, I sent in forms for 2004-2014. However, upon reading the instructions again I suspect Alan will not get them all ... "

As is obvious, I missed the restriction stated on the back of the form that says you only can get 4 years. Hence, I then posted the above item to clear it up. What does Singer claim?

"he obviously already knew only 4 would be available"

Nope, I did not know that when I sent in the form. I only figured that out the next day which is when I posted the update.

Now, what does any of this have to do with him sending in his tax forms? ZERO. It is all more BS to try and deflect away from the fact he has been completely stripped naked of his claimed persona and everyone can see he came up a lot short.

[RS__]

Funny, Rob is clearly out-numbered on this forum....yet he's been kicked off of every other gambling forum...and he's STILL trying to push his views on people. I'll him that, he doesn't give up -- the little engine that could.