Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Coach seems to have adopted the perspective that Rob should only back up his claims if someone who made no claims does what coach says.
Your are incorrect there, Oscar Madsion.

My perspective is not that Rob should not release his tax information unless arcimede$ complies with the conditions that he agreed to...rather that he will not. There's a difference.

Will Rob release the info after arcimede$ complies? I don't know, but I'm not willing to dismiss the possibility like everybody else has,
so let's find out...OK?

Round and around we go...but it's not about what I say...it's about what arci said he would do...and he hasn't done that.

Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Rob seems to have an aversion to making anything after 2009 available for inspection. Why would that be?
My understanding is that arcimede$' "prove it, liar" challenge covers the years 2000-2009.

So, anything after 2009 is not germane...it's a smokescreen...a red herring...the Chewbacca defense.