Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
No, it's actually the way scientists often view areas of study. In order to compare things that may not be exactly alike they normalize those items. Since the results of that normalization are not real, they are by definition virtual. It's quite hilarious to see Alan claiming scientists must all be "absurd". But then, he appears to believe everything the dufus tells him instead of listening to mathematicians and professionals .... which puts it all in perspective.
No Arc. Now you're being absurd. What's next? Showing how the odds of video poker draws relates to curing the national debt? Wiping out HIV? Telling us where Jimmy Hoffa is?

You have introduced us a new term for video poker discussion: "logical session." I never heard it from Bob Dancer, or John Grochowski, or Wizard of Odds Shackleford, or even from Singer!! But now, you tell us it is the standard for video poker analysis!!

Well, if you keep posting it, and create your own website or blog about it, eventually Google will pick it up, Wikipedia will create a page, and you, Arc, will be known as the father of "Video Poker Logical Session Analysis." And then the rest of us will be able to say with pride -- we were there at the moment of creation.

Of course you will have to get Dancer, Grochowski, Scott, Shackleford and everyone else to rewrite their books. Perhaps South Point or Station Casinos will hire you for a series of seminars? Hmmm, let's see: I predict your "logical session" of lectures will be...... ZERO.