Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
You're right. Now a reality check: even Rob said he chose to make a "special play" only 5% of the time.

My honest opinion: he rarely used a special play. And that 5% of the time that he mentioned -- I'm thinking it was 5% of the time when he could make a special play or the conventional play. So what tiny percentage of VP hands might that be?

I think his special plays were "headline grabbers" that factored very little into his real results. After all that last $50,000 win he showed us -- was it a "special play"? No. And he said he didn't even consider using a special play.
Still doesn't change the fact he was playing negative games. I had several W2Gs in 2014 in just 3 months when I didn't win a cent. This past year I had over 100 W2Gs and while I won, all it would have taken is about 10 fewer to have netted me a loss. I played just a little over the return of the game. Singer claims to have played games with a 98-99% return. Even if he would have been as lucky as I was he would have still lost.

In fact, why believe anything he shows. It is easy to walk around a high limit room and take a picture of someone who got a lucky hit. It is not evidence of squat. The only evidence that Singer could have provided is his tax returns and he refused. I wonder what kind of special play that is?