Originally Posted by
Rob.Singer
Ask yourself this: Dancer has been bragging about how he's been winning from the casinos in LV for years, year after year, and he usually identifies at least some of those casinos. So would you not think that his regular haunts, ie. Palms, M, South Point, Hard Rock, Gold Coast, Stations, Dotties etc. would be banning him from playing? The mere fact that they haven't should confirm to a sensible person that he's instead been LOSING at most or all of these places.
Dancer says a lot of made-up things in his articles, and he does that because he's understandably running out of material after so many years. He's also a self-admitted unethical, rule-bending/rule-breaking vp player, who will do anything to feel like he has some kind of edge over wherever he plays. His business income is his lifeblood in that it allows him to keep playing. So when he writes that he's been blocked from the machines at Suncoast or any other place, why would you think he does that? You act like he has no reason to do such a thing. Think about what his reputation and cred mean to his income. It's been my experience that if a casino bans someone from their property or their machines, they put it and the reason for it in writing. That's the main reason I published my Bellagio banning when it happened, because all we've ever had previously (and since) is some people making unsupported claims for their own selfish purposes.
Mickey, how about I challenge you to get your pal Dancer to publish his ban letter from Suncoast? Surely he must have one. Why would he ever write about it if he didn't? I could have been lied to or I could be lying, right?
Reply With Quote