No, I'm simply asking "what is the lie?" and suggesting that those calling him a liar should identify the lie,Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie
and then we can explore whether or not a lie has been told.
Responding that "everything he says is a lie" is a cop out...it's a tap out.
So what you're saying then is that everything "Old Rob" says is/was the truth?Originally Posted by coach belly
Undeniably :-)Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie
No, I'm simply asking "what is the lie?"Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie
It seems like you are trying to put words in my mouth...
I get that impression when you write "Coach belly is suggesting" and "So what you're saying then is".
Can you answer my question...what is the lie?...any lie that you know Rob Singer has told.
I think that is a valid question. Specifically, what is the lie? And, was it a false statement made with an intent to deceive?Originally Posted by coach belly
I haven't found where arci wrote things about his vp play that don't add up, and I understand it's a tough question for him because in order to do his usual explanation dance, he'd first have to figure out how to make himself feel good about it in front if everyone. I also remember stating that "it could have been a typo" & "or am I reading this wrong". For arci to come back and claim I'm lying without any substance or support is typical arci. He's not unlike a jolted lover or a woman scourned.
Redietz is on the warpath with me but he's riding a horse with a fractured leg. I said my source in LV confirmed Frank's death to me, and I think it was count room who said his told him he believed Frank was alive. Simple known facts support what I've said. The guy was off balance, broke constantly (per him, not me) a chain smoking/nail biting nervous wreck, and he told me he'd never make it past 50. Has redietz criticized COUNT for using an unnamed source?
Then there's red and his unusual fascination with a lie-detector, and his assertion that it takes law enforcement to interpret a personality in a face-to-face meeting/interrogation. Well red, you might say I spent my first ten years of work in "law enforcement". But while I certainly do know how to manipulate a polygraph, acting was not part of my training.
Would you trust mickey's views over Alan's?
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 02-06-2016 at 10:52 PM.
Regarding Frank Kneeland: I hope he's alive and well. I sent him a private message on Facebook and so far there is no response. I just sent a text to the last cell phone number I have for him.
I too hope he's still around because I saw a troubled human being when we were meeting up. He made me feel completely out of my element being around him, and we met in the Silverton where I was on a great winning streak. After much discussion about life& work experiences, the only thing we had in common was we both breathed air.
Frank just texted me.
Is he OK? Any info on what's happened?
I just read some of his posts on FB. He seems to be doing MUCH better and has a fiancee. One thing I noticed was not a single mention of casinos, gambling, or video poker....And he lives in LV. Could be that all he needed was to get away from that stuff?
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 02-06-2016 at 11:36 PM.
Rob discovers fact checking at the age of how the hell old are you, Rob? Well, better late than never.
You're displaying the hate again red. I've said many times that someone in LV told me he passed on. If you didn't agree then it was you who should have dug deeper. To me it didn't matter one way or the other so I simply reported what I heard and identified it as such. The only reason it matters so much to you tonight is because it involves me. Otherwise, you'd be writing another long, articulate, spell-checked post that says absolutely nothing.
Frank is risen. How appropriate for Ash Wednesday.
Anyone else see the irony in this statement?Originally Posted by coach belly
So what constitues a lie? Do any of these meet your standards?
Old Rob constantly says Alan is an addicted gambler. Alan says he isn't. Is one lying and one telling the truth? Both lying? Both telling the truth?
Old Rob denies ever posting under someone else's name in the forums. Anyone here remember the "jatki" incident?
Old Rob said years ago that he never plays VP over $2 any longer, but later posts jackpots he won on $25 VP machines.
Dan Druff provides proof via date and time stamps that Old Rob did not win jackpots when he says he did.
New Rob says Old Rob was a fabricated online persona. Alan himself confirms it was all an act. Doesn't that cast doubt on everything Old Rob posted?
Last edited by a2a3dseddie; 02-07-2016 at 04:43 AM.
As usual you run to the little man's side like an upset mommy to protect her little cub. Aren't you just so cute. I can see you two hugging and kissing.Originally Posted by coach belly
Look belly boy, someone makes a claim that you correct the first time. It's not like the information was hidden somewhere, it is in multiple places of several threads. They then repeat the claim. I think most folks would now claim they are now lying. It's not like your little guy hasn't lied a thousand times before.
Since I know you'll run back and likely take something out of context, I'll help you out. The conversation is on the last page of the LittleMan-itis thread.
EDIT: I just notice on that thread that the little man claimed I was lying in one of his comments and mama belly got so upset .... oh wait, he didn't say a word. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Last edited by arcimede$; 02-07-2016 at 07:13 AM.
You're lying again Eddie because you know you can't prove any of that.Originally Posted by a2a3dseddieAnyone else see the irony in this statement?
So what constitues a lie? Do any of these meet your standards?
Old Rob constantly says Alan is an addicted gambler. Alan says he isn't. Is one lying and one telling the truth? Both lying? Both telling the truth?
Old Rob denies ever posting under someone else's name in the forums. Anyone here remember the "jatki" incident?
Old Rob said years ago that he never plays VP over $2 any longer, but later posts jackpots he won on $25 VP machines.
Dan Druff provides proof via date and time stamps that Old Rob did not win jackpots when he says he did.
New Rob says Old Rob was a fabricated online persona. Alan himself confirms it was all an act. Doesn't that cast doubt on everything Old Rob posted?
My true belief is that Alan is an addicted gambler. He says he's not. If you look up gambling addicts you'd find where it's common for them to deny they are. I have personal experience with this so that's where my belief comes from. Explain why this is a lie.
"jatki" was not me, and I've never posted anywhere under any other alias without first identifying myself. Do you have or is there any electronic proof that disputes that? If so please provide what is obviously false evidence. If not then you're lying.
After winning jackpots on the $25 machines and seeing the tax consequences as a schedule A filer, I clearly explained that I would no longer be posting big jackpots that get people like you so jealous, because I would no longer be playing anything higher than $2. Please explain why you twisted that.
Those controversial dates/time stamps were because I used an old digital camera that I put a picture up of back then--the type that needed to be reset when batteries were changed. Do you have proof it was me spoofing a jackpot picture? If not then you're lying. And it's curious you didn't say anything about that controversial off-center $25 machine insignia that Alan provided proof of it's existence? We're we in cahoots on that, or did it humble you?
"Old Rob" as you put it, knows how to handle himself with online liars, it's been fun all along, and responding to that type of hater in ways that cuts to their souls is the only way to treat these trolls.
I've seen numerous other posts claiming things like I'm busted and broke, we live in a trailer, this is in fact no "we" because Cindy "left" me, I lost everything I won as a pro, we didn't have 2 RV's, and I even believe there was a post saying I've been or needed hospitalization to treat, if I remember this correctly, something like NPD?
So while you're at it Eddie, please see if you can provide proof for any of that also.
As I said before, I have exaggerated some things to some extent at times and I have been what you upstanding citizens consider way too tough on the liars and haters, but on this forum I have never lied.
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 02-07-2016 at 07:19 AM.
On no, mama belly is going to get so, so, very upset.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
He seems to have gotten you flustered with this lying thing. If you stop telling them then you'd be better equipped to see what he's actually talking about.Originally Posted by arcimede$
LOL. You've been pwned again, little man, and mama belly is looking like a complete fool. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Rob, let me ask you something directly. When you said that I didn't want to show up for the Hard Rock Corral thing because somebody would recognize who I really was, what exactly did you mean?
I can't figure out if it was a case of confusion, delusion, mis-remembering something, opining, or whether a source had told you I wasn't me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote