Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Rob has never presented the science that backs up his claims. He says three mathematicians (I think they are in Europe) proved the basis for his strategy. At the same time, Rob admits that his "special plays" are at a mathematical disadvantage.

Frankly, we have gone over this a hundred times.

Why redietz persists makes me think his only goal is to continue to bash Rob.

redietz let me save you the trouble: there is no proof that we know of, or that Rob has presented. I doubt we will ever see it. Close this book because you're just wasting time.
I think closing this book would be splendid; it's a complete waste of time, other than the whole paranormal claim angle. Unfortunately, Rob keeps inserting references in this thread and that regarding his alleged history and systems. So anybody sitting down and reading Dan's forum for the first time is going to be exposed to Rob's suggestions that his is the way to win. If Rob just laid out his alleged personal history as evidence for his claims, fine. That would be like a brokerage service advertising last quarter's results. Rob, however, never adds "past results are no guarantee of similar future success." He doesn't claim to have won for a stretch in time; he claims to have solved negative video poker.

As a respected journalist, you should be on board with pointing this out at every opportunity.