Originally Posted by redietz View Post
That was an excellent explanation of unseen card effects. I haven't played blackjack in 25 years, and I know nothing, but that was cogent and clear. I don't see what can be argued with -- unseen cards tally as unseen cards. Eminently logical and obvious.
Leave it to you to blindly agree with some self-proclaimed AP who is now arguing against the math.

Kew, imagine how any video poker ap would fare if he or she (no, not a transgender freak) claimed they played based only on the removal of "cards seen" and not based on the removal of all cards dealt. The same goes for counting cards. You people claim to go strictly by the math, yet whenever you get called on your BS then suddenly there's room for error....and in this case, PLENTY of room for error in a game where the theoretical edge is minimal under perfect circumstances.

Thus, my point about how the lot of you would have been much better off taking statistics classes on your way to college degrees instead of fighting for crazy alternative lifestyle and making believe any of you know what you're talking about. And bringing up that fool Wong hardly helps your case. He's always been about self-perception in order to grow his commercial gaming sales.

Wise up.