Of Math and Men

[Rob.Singer]

It's not up to Alan to supply such documentation. You are the individual making the assertion. If one is to believe that you have such material merely because you say so, then it's equally believable that I have the facts to sustain what I say. After all, everything on the internet is true.

You're misreading this Vic. I never asked Alan to supply my documentation. I simply explained what I did to prove out a belief to myself, Alan asked to see that proof because he sensibly can't really believe machines aren't random without some kind of proof, and I said I'd bring him to the documentation. That way there could be no 3rd party stupid claims that I just created the paperwork in the last two weeks.

You also missed where it was never my intention to do anything but present my findings to the NGC upon proving it out to myself, but I repidly discovered they wanted no part of it. To me, that is a tell-all of tell-alls. But I also found out that whenever I mentioned this effort on my site or afterwards, on forums, certain disbelievers couldnt't let it go and wanted to see.more....until it got too close to really happening, that is. Then, just as with the revenue-protecting Gaming Commission, the doors shut just as quickly as they opened.

BTW, I've said where I got my facts to sustain my "assertion"; where'd you get yours? On the Internet?