At the time I made the $10,000 challenge to Singer my daily average earn was $562. I would have had no problem doing it legitimately. But your line right here, coach, "can't really produce any win without an accomplice" is exactly correct. Now we are getting somewhere. That is really a profound statement. I'm surprised you are the one that came up with it but thanks for the quote. It goes right to the heart of how things work in short term advantage machine play.Originally Posted by coach belly
Yes, it would be very easy to create a false win on UX's because I would have to pay an agent to create the multipliers. He creates a loss in creating the multipliers and I create a win playing them off. This scam was actually worked in reverse at the Revel loss rebate promotion. The player showing the big loss got the rebates. However, the 2nd player picked most of the money back up by playing the multipliers off.
So what am I getting at here? How about if you had a player that created the multipliers for you without charging you anything? Or how about if you had lots of players creating the multipliers for you and not charging you anything? That is exactly what the general public, the recreational gamblers, are doing. They play these games and leave multipliers behind for you to pick off....free of charge. It's free money. In a nutshell, coach, this is how it works for all short term advantage machine plays. The ploppies play the games and many of them leave the machine in a short term positive situation for the next player. That's where I come in. I just mosey around the casino looking for these short term positives and play them off when I find them.
So you are right, coach. How prophetic of you. I can't make a dime without accomplices. However, those accomplices, the ploppies, aren't charging me for it. And they have no clue that they are my accomplices. How sweet it is.
Reply With Quote