Originally Posted by LarryS View Post
really what good is a list of rules. Once yu have the list then you will have people complaining about the interpretation of each rule.

mickey crimm crying that rule number 3 needs to be enforced

monet challenging that rule number 3 was unfairly enforced in being too strict


alan challenging that the punishment for rule number 3 should have been more severe.

you end up with a 600 page thread like they have at wov talking about the high crimes perpetrated and the punishments or lack thereof


Sometimes I think a list of rules is more disruptive,

once you have rules like "no trolling" or no insults" like at wov..then the fun begins when someone is suspended for calling someone "a real genius" whiles someone else is allowed to call someone "idiotic". Its happened at wov many times. And then there is the definition of "troll"...where soomeone on the wrong side of an issue can more easily be viewed as "trolling". Again..its happened.over and over at wov.
You forgot to insert "larry crying about the rules being enforced."