"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
mickey, these so-called experts would only make guesses like you people do, because they just aren't smart enuf to comprehend the advanced methodology I use to win at vp. Who needs opinions from a bunch of uneducated dropouts when it's clear redietz' group of university math professors would all side with me?
I met some of those mathematicians when we went on break during Rob's roundtable at the last G2E. Rob hadn't ever, in thousands of posts, mentioned any of their names, but I recognized them because they were wearing "I [heart] Rob Singer" shirts. We went out into the hall so I could get their take on the systems, but none of them spoke English. Damn shame. I had made arrangements to do a guest column in Gaming Today about the mathematical basis of Rob's systems. Now I'm out of luck. Hey, maybe Mr. Mendelson has a copy of the systems somewhere. He's known for his accuracy and objectivity, so I'm sure he wouldn't foist a system on the public that he hadn't carefully read or at least gotten a complete transcript of the system on tape. Maybe he could help Gaming Today out and share his info.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
And this of course has given rise to the newest of terms on VCT, "phantom mathematicians."
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
You didn't read my articles. If you had read them then you would have clearly seen the purpose behind the interviews. Again you are not looking for an objective presentation. You are looking for condemnation. Give it up. I understand what you want. I didn't give it to you. I gave an objective presentation INCLUDING ROB'S OWN ADMISSION THAT HIS SPECIALS PLAYS ARE AT A MATHEMATICAL DISADVANTAGE.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Mickeycrimm see my new post with my challenge to Redietz. You can also consider that to be a challenge to you as well.
Off topic, but did you pay your son yet? And are his kids suffering for it? Just trying to make sure they are not having to get subsidized meals at school because of your choices Alan.
While I and other members who pay taxes don’t want to support them, it’s more about the embarrassment they face from peers. We will be fine but don’t want to see the little Mendelson’s suffering because of your addiction.
And yea, I know you will send this to Dano, because blame and deflection is what addicts do. I’ll be fine no matter what. I hope you prove me wrong and Slappy can post here you paid him back 100%, quit gambling and have become a productive member of society.
Classes daily Alan, classes daily.
mickey, your silly bias makes you look so dumb. After I developed my play strategy following receiving two degrees grounded in advanced math and working in a technical fields for 25 years, I indeed did have 3 hard math guys review my approach. And as I've said many times, Franz Schaeffler (engineer from Rhode & Schwarz in Munich), another engineer friend of mine from the UAE, and a math professor friend in China all gave me their favourable opinions after they reviewed the strategy, for a healthy fee.
I know you think you know all "correct math" because you understand how to calculate gambling percentages. But people like me and the colleagues I've had throughout my career laugh at impersonators like you, and you probably can't even figure out why.
Next time wise up, and listen to sling.
Rob's math is not wrong. It's how he plays that's different. The math is not different.
Is that too hard to understand?
Also, Rob never guaranteed it would work. But ya know what? You APs seem to guarantee wins of $6 or $8 an hour with your constant play.
There you go with insults, mickeycrimm, when you have nothing worthwhile to say. I used to think insults were beneath you.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)