Already you see a clown like jbjb in fear of another reasonable answer that doesn't agree with his nonsense. What these fools are too dumb to realize is how their pre-emptive strikes only make them appear weak.

Alan, I don't truly know what % of the wins are/were via large hits. That's not something of any importance to me. However, mickey's statement about me having some kind of ability to hit "so many big winners in a short period of time" is both true and false.

The false part is that I'm no more likely to hit a big winner than anybody else, and to him, a quad on $5 and up machines is one of those "big winners". The true part is, although these people just can't get the structurally advantageous rationale behind why and how and when I utilize my special plays that deviate from optimal strategy, the undeniable fact is they HAVE presented a small % increase in bigger winners, ending some sessions where they normally would not have ended. And if I were a zombie AP playing on and on because I believed I had an edge on the play, these would simply be winners that would get played through as if they had zero meaning.